What is the primary objective of **FedRAMP**?

**FedRAMP's primary objective is to standardize the security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring of cloud service offerings (CSOs) for U.S. federal agencies under the "assess once, use many times" model.** Administered by the FedRAMP PMO at GSA, it leverages **NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5** controls and **FIPS 199** impact levels (Low, Moderate, High) to eliminate duplicated agency reviews, accelerate secure cloud adoption, and ensure FISMA compliance.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **FedRAMP**?

**FedRAMP is mandatory for cloud service providers (CSPs) handling federal data in externally accessible cloud services, with limited exceptions for purely internal agency systems.** Federal agencies must use **FedRAMP-authorized CSOs** per OMB policy unless exceptions apply; CSPs targeting federal contracts, including those under CMMC, require authorization to access the **FedRAMP Marketplace** (484 Authorized, 73 In Process as of recent data).

Does **FedRAMP** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, FedRAMP mandates independent assessments by accredited Third-Party Assessment Organizations (3PAOs).** 3PAOs, accredited by A2LA to ISO/IEC 17020, produce the **Security Assessment Report (SAR)**, **Security Assessment Plan (SAP)**, and contribute to the **POA&M** using **NIST SP 800-53A** procedures; no standalone certification exists—authorization (ATO) follows via Agency or Program paths.

How often should an assessment for **FedRAMP** be performed?

**FedRAMP requires continuous monitoring with monthly deliverables (e.g., vulnerability scans, POA&M updates) and annual 3PAO reassessments.** Quarterly assessments may apply for high-risk areas; the **Rev 5 Continuous Monitoring Playbook** mandates ongoing telemetry, with full reassessments tied to significant changes or persistent findings to maintain **FedRAMP Authorized** Marketplace status.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **FedRAMP**?

**Non-compliance risks revocation of Authorization to Operate (ATO), delisting from the FedRAMP Marketplace, and loss of federal contracts.** Agencies may withdraw sponsorship, impose remediation, or pursue legal exposure under FISMA/DOJ civil fraud; persistent POA&M failures or monitoring lapses lead to suspension, blocking "assess once, use many times" reuse.

An **FedRAMP** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**FedRAMP baselines align directly with NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, enabling mappings to frameworks like the NIST Cybersecurity Framework via OSCAL.** While not explicitly international, its NIST foundation supports control reuse (e.g., for CMMC), but FedRAMP overlays require cloud-specific tailoring; no formal equivalency to non-U.S. standards is defined.

What is the first step to begin implementing **FedRAMP**?

**The first step is conducting FIPS 199 impact categorization to select the baseline (Low ~156 controls, Moderate ~323, High ~410, or LI-SaaS ~45 assessed).** Develop the **System Security Plan (SSP)** using FedRAMP Rev 5 templates, secure an agency sponsor (or pursue Program path), and perform a 3PAO readiness assessment to identify gaps early.

What is the primary objective of **MAS TRM**?

**MAS TRM's primary objective is to establish sound and robust technology risk governance and oversight while maintaining cyber resilience through defence-in-depth and continuous improvement of IT processes and controls to preserve confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of data and systems.** As outlined in the January 2021 Guidelines Preface (Section 1.4), the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) targets financial institutions (FIs) to manage risks from rapid digitalisation, IT complexity, and sophisticated cyber threats like fraud, data exfiltration, and disruptions in interconnected ecosystems.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **MAS TRM**?

**MAS TRM applies to all financial institutions (FIs) supervised by MAS, including banks, insurers, capital market intermediaries, payment service providers, and fintech sandbox participants, with implementation proportionate to risk and complexity (Section 2.2).** FIs must ensure board and senior management accountability (Section 3.1), including appointing a CIO/CTO/Head of IT and CISO/Head of Information Security approved by the CEO (Section 3.1.3). Observance is a key supervisory consideration, though not a legal standard of care.

Does **MAS TRM** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**MAS TRM mandates an independent internal audit function to assess controls, risk management, and governance effectiveness (Sections 3.1.7, 15), but does not require external audits or third-party certification.** FIs must ensure independent assurance, with audit evaluating TRM framework adherence; external penetration testing or managed services may support requirements like annual testing for Internet-facing systems (Section 13.2.4).

How often should an assessment for **MAS TRM** be performed?

**MAS TRM requires regular, risk-commensurate assessments, including annual penetration testing for Internet-accessible systems (Section 13.2.4), periodic vulnerability assessments (Section 13.1.1), annual DR plan reviews (Section 8.2.2), and policy/framework reviews due to evolving threats (Sections 3.2.1, 4.1.5).** Asset inventories, risk registers, and cyber exercises must be updated periodically based on criticality, changes, or incidents.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **MAS TRM**?

**Non-compliance with MAS TRM risks supervisory actions including fines, license conditions, revocations, and executive prohibitions, as MAS considers Guideline observance in supervision (Section 2.2).** Examples include S$27.45 million in AML/CFT fines across nine FIs and CMS license revocation for governance lapses; weak TRM amplifies operational disruptions, reputational damage, and customer harm.

Can **MAS TRM** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, MAS TRM aligns with frameworks like NIST CSF 2.0 for risk management cycles and ISO 27001 for ISMS controls (Section 3.2.1 encourages industry standards).** Mapping supports proportional implementation: TRM's governance (Section 3), risk framework (Section 4), and cyber assessments (Section 13) integrate with NIST's Identify-Protect-Detect-Respond-Recover-Govern and ISO Annex A domains.

What is the first step to begin implementing **MAS TRM**?

**The first step is board and senior management approval of a technology risk appetite/tolerance statement and establishment of a TRM framework with independent oversight (Sections 3.1.7–3.1.8, 4.1).** Develop an information asset inventory including third-party assets (Section 3.3), appoint CIO/CISO, and define policies/standards (Section 3.2) commensurate with FI risk profile.

FedRAMP vs MAS TRM

Standards Comparison

FedRAMP

Mandatory

2011

U.S. government program standardizing cloud security authorizations

MAS TRM

Mandatory

2021

Singapore guidelines for technology risk management in finance.

Quick Verdict

FedRAMP standardizes cloud security for US federal use via 3PAO assessments, while MAS TRM provides proportionate guidelines for Singapore FIs' technology risks. Organizations adopt FedRAMP for government contracts; MAS TRM ensures cyber resilience and regulatory compliance.

Cloud Security

FedRAMP

Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Assess once, use many times across agencies
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 baselines at three impact levels
Mandatory continuous monitoring with quarterly assessments
Independent 3PAO security assessments required
FedRAMP Marketplace for authorized CSO visibility

Technology Risk Management

MAS TRM

MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Board and senior management accountability
Proportional risk-based implementation
Third-party service risk management
Annual penetration testing for internet systems
Comprehensive cyber resilience lifecycle

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

FedRAMP Details

What It Is

FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program) is a U.S. government-wide framework standardizing security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud services used by federal agencies. Its primary purpose is enabling "assess once, use many times" to reduce duplication, based on NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls tailored to FIPS 199 impact levels (Low, Moderate, High, LI-SaaS).

Key Components

Baselines with ~156 (Low), 323 (Moderate), 410 (High) controls across 20 families.
Core artifacts: SSP, SAR, POA&M, continuous monitoring plans.
Built on NIST standards; uses 3PAO assessments and FedRAMP Marketplace.
Compliance via Agency or Program Authorizations, emphasizing automation (FedRAMP 20x).

Why Organizations Use It

CSPs pursue FedRAMP for federal contract access (e.g., $20M+ opportunities, CMMC mandates), risk reduction, and commercial differentiation. It builds stakeholder trust, unlocks government markets, and signals mature security.

Implementation Overview

Involves FIPS 199 categorization, SSP development, 3PAO assessment, remediation. Targets CSPs selling to federal agencies; 12-18 months typical, high costs ($150k-$2M+). Requires specialized teams, ongoing quarterly monitoring.

MAS TRM Details

What It Is

MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (revised January 2021) are supervisory guidance issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore for financial institutions. They provide a principles-based framework focused on governance, cybersecurity, resilience, and third-party risks to preserve CIA of systems and data. Implementation is proportional to risk profile and complexity.

Key Components

15 sections covering governance, risk frameworks, SDLC, IT service management, resilience, access controls, cryptography, cyber operations, assessments, and audit.
Synthesised into 12 core principles like board accountability, asset inventories, secure-by-design, and layered defences.
No fixed controls; emphasises defence-in-depth and continuous improvement.
Compliance via supervisory review, no formal certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets MAS supervisory expectations to avoid fines/enforcement.
Enhances resilience, reduces cyber/incident risks.
Builds stakeholder trust in digital finance.
Enables secure innovation and third-party partnerships.

Implementation Overview

**Risk-based rolloutasset inventory, control mapping, testing cycles.
Applies to all MAS-supervised FIs; scalable by size/complexity.
Involves governance setup, training, audits; 12-24 months typical.

Key Differences

Aspect	FedRAMP	MAS TRM
Scope	Cloud security assessment, authorization, monitoring	Technology risk governance, cyber resilience, operations
Industry	US federal agencies, cloud providers	Singapore financial institutions, broad FIs
Nature	Standardized authorization program, mandatory for federal	Supervisory guidelines, proportionate implementation
Testing	3PAO assessments, continuous monitoring, annual SAR	Annual PT for internet systems, vulnerability assessments
Penalties	Loss of authorization, no federal contracts	Fines, license revocation, executive prohibitions

Scope

FedRAMP

Cloud security assessment, authorization, monitoring

MAS TRM

Technology risk governance, cyber resilience, operations

Industry

FedRAMP

US federal agencies, cloud providers

MAS TRM

Singapore financial institutions, broad FIs

Nature

FedRAMP

Standardized authorization program, mandatory for federal

MAS TRM

Supervisory guidelines, proportionate implementation

Testing

FedRAMP

3PAO assessments, continuous monitoring, annual SAR

MAS TRM

Annual PT for internet systems, vulnerability assessments

Penalties

FedRAMP

Loss of authorization, no federal contracts

MAS TRM

Fines, license revocation, executive prohibitions

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about FedRAMP and MAS TRM

FedRAMP FAQ

MAS TRM FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for

Proving CIS Controls v8.1 Works: A KPI & Evidence Framework for Board Reporting, Audits, and Continuous Assurance

Prove CIS Controls v8.1 effectiveness with KPI catalog, evidence checklist & reporting cadence. Ideal for board reports, audits & cyber-insurance. Measure outco

Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance

Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 14001 vs AS9120B

Compare ISO 14001 vs AS9120B: EMS sustainability meets aerospace QMS rigor. Uncover clause alignments, Annex SL integration, and key implementation differences for optimal compliance. Dive in now!

NIS2 vs RoHS

Discover NIS2 vs RoHS: Cybersecurity mandates vs hazardous substance restrictions. Essential entities face strict reporting, fines to 2% turnover. Ensure EU compliance—compare now!

NIST 800-171 vs WELL

Compare NIST 800-171 vs WELL: Cybersecurity for CUI meets building health standards. Uncover key differences, compliance strategies & secure workspace integration. Dive in now!

FedRAMP

MAS TRM

Quick Verdict

FedRAMP

Key Features

MAS TRM

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

FedRAMP Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

MAS TRM Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

FedRAMP FAQ

What is the primary objective of FedRAMP?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with FedRAMP?

Does FedRAMP require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for FedRAMP be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with FedRAMP?

An FedRAMP be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing FedRAMP?

MAS TRM FAQ

What is the primary objective of MAS TRM?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with MAS TRM?

Does MAS TRM require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for MAS TRM be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with MAS TRM?

Can MAS TRM be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing MAS TRM?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

Proving CIS Controls v8.1 Works: A KPI & Evidence Framework for Board Reporting, Audits, and Continuous Assurance

Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 14001 vs AS9120B

NIS2 vs RoHS

NIST 800-171 vs WELL