Standards Comparison

    FERPA

    Mandatory
    1974

    U.S. regulation protecting privacy of student education records

    VS

    HITRUST CSF

    Voluntary
    2022

    Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards

    Quick Verdict

    FERPA mandates student record privacy for U.S. schools via access rights and disclosure limits, enforced by funding cuts. HITRUST CSF offers voluntary certification of harmonized security controls for healthcare and regulated firms, enabling trusted assurance and multi-framework compliance.

    Student Privacy

    FERPA

    Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Establishes rights to access, amend, and consent for education records
    • Mandates prior written consent for PII disclosures with exceptions
    • Defines expansive PII including direct and linkable indirect identifiers
    • Requires annual notifications and detailed disclosure recordkeeping
    • Applies to federally funded educational agencies institution-wide
    Information Security

    HITRUST CSF

    HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF)

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Harmonizes 60+ frameworks into single assessment
    • Risk-based tailoring with defined factors
    • Five-level maturity scoring model
    • Tiered certifications (e1, i1, r2)
    • MyCSF platform for scoping and evidence

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    FERPA Details

    What It Is

    FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974), codified at 20 U.S.C. § 1232g with regulations at 34 CFR Part 99, is a U.S. federal regulation. It safeguards privacy of personally identifiable information (PII) in education records for institutions receiving federal education funds. FERPA employs a rights-based approach with consent requirements, exceptions, and operational controls.

    Key Components

    • **Rights triadinspect/review within 45 days, amend inaccurate/misleading records, consent to disclosures.
    • Broad definitions of education records and PII (direct/indirect/linkable identifiers).
    • Disclosure rules: consent default plus enumerated exceptions (school officials, emergencies, audits).
    • Obligations: annual notices, disclosure logs, access methods. Enforced via complaints, no certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Maintains federal funding eligibility amid enforcement risks.
    • Mitigates complaints, investigations, reputational harm.
    • Builds trust with students, parents, stakeholders.
    • Enables compliant data use for education, edtech, research.
    • Drives efficient governance and risk management.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased program: governance, data inventory/classification, policies/training, RBAC/logging, vendor DPAs. Applies to K-12/postsecondary funded entities. Ongoing monitoring/audits; DOE oversight via Family Policy Compliance Office.

    HITRUST CSF Details

    What It Is

    HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework that consolidates requirements from 60+ authoritative sources like HIPAA, NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and GDPR. Its risk-based approach tailors controls via organizational, system, and regulatory factors.

    Key Components

    • 19 assessment domains (e.g., Access Control, Incident Management, Risk Management)
    • Hierarchical structure: 14 categories, 49 objectives, ~156 specifications
    • **Five-level maturity modelPolicy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed
    • **Tiered certificationse1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored, 2-year)

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Demonstrates unified compliance and third-party assurance
    • Reduces audit fatigue via assess once, report many
    • Enhances risk management and operational maturity
    • Builds stakeholder trust in healthcare and regulated sectors

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: scoping in MyCSF platform, gap analysis, remediation, validated assessment by authorized assessors. Suited for healthcare, finance; requires policies, evidence, certification via HITRUST QA. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    FERPA
    Student education records and PII privacy
    HITRUST CSF
    Comprehensive security and privacy controls

    Industry

    FERPA
    U.S. education institutions only
    HITRUST CSF
    Healthcare, finance, regulated sectors globally

    Nature

    FERPA
    Mandatory U.S. federal regulation
    HITRUST CSF
    Voluntary certifiable framework

    Testing

    FERPA
    No formal certification; internal compliance
    HITRUST CSF
    Validated assessments by external assessors

    Penalties

    FERPA
    Federal funding suspension
    HITRUST CSF
    Loss of certification, no legal penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about FERPA and HITRUST CSF

    FERPA FAQ

    HITRUST CSF FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages