What is the primary objective of **ISO 14064**?

**ISO 14064 provides requirements and guidance for quantifying, reporting, and verifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and removals.** The standard family—**ISO 14064-1:2018** for organizational inventories, **ISO 14064-2:2019** for project-level reductions/removals, and **ISO 14064-3:2019** for validation/verification—ensures GHG statements are credible through five principles: **relevance**, **completeness**, **consistency**, **transparency**, and **accuracy**. It supports organizational boundaries (e.g., equity share or operational control), Scope 1-3 classification, baseline scenarios, and risk-based assurance.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 14064**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with ISO 14064, as it is a voluntary international standard.** It is professionally adopted by companies, governments, NGOs, project developers, and verification bodies needing credible GHG data for regulatory readiness (e.g., emissions trading), investor disclosures, supply-chain demands, and carbon markets. Users include those compiling enterprise inventories (**Part 1**), quantifying project benefits (**Part 2**), or performing assurance (**Part 3**).

Does **ISO 14064** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 14064 does not require external audit or third-party certification.** Parts 1 and 2 provide optional verification under **ISO 14064-3:2019**, which specifies validation (forward-looking) or verification (historical) at limited or reasonable assurance levels. Independent assurance by competent bodies (aligned with **ISO 14065:2020**) enhances credibility but is market-driven, not mandatory.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 14064** be performed?

**ISO 14064 assessments should be performed annually for organizational inventories to ensure consistency and comparability.** **Part 1** mandates reporting over a defined period (typically calendar year), with base-year recalculations for significant structural changes (e.g., acquisitions). Project monitoring (**Part 2**) follows defined plans, while verification (**Part 3**) aligns with reporting cycles or stakeholder needs.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 14064**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 14064 carries no direct penalties, as it is voluntary.** Indirect consequences include rejected GHG claims in markets, failed stakeholder assurances, regulatory scrutiny in disclosure regimes, reputational damage from greenwashing, and exclusion from carbon finance or procurement. Poor inventories risk material misstatements during **Part 3** verification.

Can **ISO 14064** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 14064 maps closely to the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard, sharing identical principles of relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy.** **Part 1** aligns with Scope 1-3 categories; **Part 2** supports project baselines/additionality; **Part 3** enables verification compatible with programs like CDP. It integrates with **ISO 14001** EMS via PDCA cycles.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 14064**?

**The first step is defining organizational and operational boundaries per ISO 14064-1.** Select consolidation approach (e.g., **operational control** or **equity share**), identify emission sources/sinks, classify Scopes 1-3, and document relevance to ensure completeness within chosen limits.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 19600**?

**ISO 19600 provides guidelines for establishing, developing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving an effective Compliance Management System (CMS).** Published in 2014 as a Type B guidance standard, it follows a risk-based, PDCA structure across 10 clauses (context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement), emphasizing principles of good governance, proportionality, transparency, and sustainability for all organization sizes and sectors.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 19600**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 19600, as it is a voluntary Type B guidance standard without mandatory requirements.** It applies universally to any entity facing statutory, regulatory, contractual, or internal obligations, including financial services, manufacturing, healthcare, technology, public sector, SMEs, and startups, to benchmark and enhance CMS maturity.

Does **ISO 19600** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, ISO 19600 does not require external audits or third-party certification, being a non-certifiable guidance document.** Organizations conduct internal audits per Clause 9.2 (aligned with ISO 19011), self-assessments, and management reviews (Clause 9.3) to evaluate CMS effectiveness.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 19600** be performed?

**ISO 19600 assessments should be performed at planned intervals via monitoring (Clause 9.1), audits (Clause 9.2), and management reviews (Clause 9.3), with reassessments triggered by changes in context, obligations, or risks (Clauses 4.1-4.6).** Quarterly reviews and annual audits are typical best practices for dynamic CMS maintenance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 19600**?

**There are no direct consequences for non-compliance with ISO 19600 itself, as it imposes no legal obligations.** Indirect risks include heightened exposure to regulatory fines, operational disruptions, reputational damage, and governance failures from lacking a structured CMS, as evidenced by cases like fines for inadequate anti-bribery controls.

Can **ISO 19600** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 19600's Annex SL high-level structure enables seamless mapping to other management system frameworks.** Its 10 clauses align with integrated systems for quality, risk, environmental, and health/safety management, facilitating a unified approach while preserving compliance independence.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 19600**?

**The first step is securing leadership commitment and establishing governance via a Compliance Steering Committee (Phase 0, Clause 5).** This includes top-management endorsement, defining CMS scope (Clause 4.3), and contextual analysis of internal/external issues and obligations (Clauses 4.1-4.2).

ISO 14064 vs ISO 19600

Standards Comparison

ISO 14064

Voluntary

2018

International standards for GHG quantification, reporting, verification

ISO 19600

Voluntary

2014

Guidelines for compliance management systems

Quick Verdict

ISO 14064 provides GHG quantification, reporting, and verification standards for organizations tracking emissions, while ISO 19600 offered compliance management guidelines for systematic obligation handling. Companies adopt ISO 14064 for credible climate disclosures and ISO 19600 for governance frameworks.

Greenhouse Gas Accounting

ISO 14064

ISO 14064 GHG quantification and verification standards

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Three-part modular structure for inventories, projects, verification
Five principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
Defines organizational/operational boundaries and Scopes 1-3
Risk-based assurance with validation/verification guidance
Aligns with GHG Protocol for global comparability

Compliance Management

ISO 19600

ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Risk-based CMS guidelines for all organizations
Principles of good governance and proportionality
PDCA cycle mirroring Annex SL structure
Scalable integration with existing management systems
Benchmark for ISO 37301 certifiable transition

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 14064 Details

What It Is

ISO 14064 is an international standard family (Parts 1:2018, 2:2019, 3:2019) for greenhouse gas (GHG) quantification, reporting, and assurance. It provides a modular framework for organizations to develop credible GHG inventories, project reductions, and third-party verified statements. Primary scope covers organizational-level emissions/removals (Part 1), project-level accounting (Part 2), and validation/verification (Part 3), using a principle-based approach emphasizing transparency and accuracy.

Key Components

**Three interdependent partsOrganizational inventories, project quantification, assurance processes.
**Five core principlesRelevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy.
Scopes 1-3 classification with boundary options (equity/operational control).
No formal certification; relies on independent verification under Part 3.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives regulatory compliance (e.g., CSRD, SB-253), investor trust, and decarbonization strategy. Mitigates greenwashing risks, enables carbon markets, and reveals efficiency opportunities. Enhances comparability for stakeholders.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: governance, boundary setting, data systems, verification. Suited for all sizes/industries; 6-12 months typical. Requires cross-functional teams, software, and ISO 14065-accredited verifiers.

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

ISO 19600:2014 is an International Organization for Standardization (ISO) guideline standard titled Compliance management systems — Guidelines. It provides non-certifiable Type B guidance for establishing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a Compliance Management System (CMS). The risk-based approach applies universally across organizations, emphasizing proportionality to size, sector, and complexity, structured around Annex SL with 10 clauses.

Key Components

Core principles: good governance, proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
Pillars: context analysis, leadership commitment, planning (obligations/risks), support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement via PDCA cycle.
No fixed controls; focuses on flexible processes like risk registers, policies, training, audits.
Non-certifiable; used for benchmarking and internal alignment.

Why Organizations Use It

Mitigates legal, regulatory, reputational risks; reduces penalties and disruptions.
Drives efficiency (10-20% cost savings), market access, cultural integrity.
Enhances stakeholder trust, competitive edge in RFPs; preps for ISO 37301 transition.

Implementation Overview

**Phased roadmapleadership buy-in, gap analysis, design/documentation, rollout, continuous improvement.
Scalable for SMEs to MNCs, all industries/geographies.
No formal certification; self-audits and management reviews suffice. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 14064	ISO 19600
Scope	GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification	Compliance management systems guidelines
Industry	All organizations, global GHG reporting	All sectors, universal compliance governance
Nature	Voluntary standards family, third-party verification	Guidelines (withdrawn), non-certifiable
Testing	Independent validation/verification (ISO 14064-3)	Internal audits, management reviews
Penalties	No direct penalties, credibility/market risks	No penalties, regulatory exposure remains

Scope

ISO 14064

GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification

ISO 19600

Compliance management systems guidelines

Industry

ISO 14064

All organizations, global GHG reporting

ISO 19600

All sectors, universal compliance governance

Nature

ISO 14064

Voluntary standards family, third-party verification

ISO 19600

Guidelines (withdrawn), non-certifiable

Testing

ISO 14064

Independent validation/verification (ISO 14064-3)

ISO 19600

Internal audits, management reviews

Penalties

ISO 14064

No direct penalties, credibility/market risks

ISO 19600

No penalties, regulatory exposure remains

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 14064 and ISO 19600

ISO 14064 FAQ

ISO 19600 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The DORA 'Hot Seat' Blueprint: Preparing Leadership and the Management Body for Regulatory Interviews

Prepare your Board & Management Body for DORA audits. Master the human element: demonstrate active oversight & accountability in regulatory interviews. Get the

HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Mastery: Infograph of Evidence Tagging Workflows and Top 5 Maturity Tier Acceleration Takeaways

Master MyCSF platform with infographics on evidence tagging for 1,400+ HITRUST controls across 19 domains. Cut documentation by 30%, boost Measured/Managed tier

Asset-Backed Issuers and SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Applicability, Disclosures, and Compliance Roadmap

How SEC cybersecurity rules apply to asset-backed issuers (ABS): Form 10-D disclosures, ABS-EE risk management, Inline XBRL tagging, exemptions. Roadmap for tru

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

UL Certification vs AS9100

Compare UL Certification vs AS9100: NRTL safety marks & lifecycle audits vs aerospace QMS for risk, config mgmt & product safety. Unlock compliance edge now!

GDPR vs ISO 20000

Discover GDPR vs ISO 20000: EU privacy law vs IT service management standard. Uncover key differences, compliance synergies, and strategies for secure, efficient operations. Compare now!

ISO 13485 vs EN 1090

Compare ISO 13485 vs EN 1090: Medical QMS vs steel/aluminium standards. Key differences in scope, risk controls & certification. Boost compliance now!

ISO 14064

ISO 19600

Quick Verdict

ISO 14064

Key Features

ISO 19600

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 14064 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 14064 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 14064?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 14064?

Does ISO 14064 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 14064 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 14064?

Can ISO 14064 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 14064?

ISO 19600 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 19600?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 19600?

Does ISO 19600 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 19600 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 19600?

Can ISO 19600 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 19600?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The DORA 'Hot Seat' Blueprint: Preparing Leadership and the Management Body for Regulatory Interviews

HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Mastery: Infograph of Evidence Tagging Workflows and Top 5 Maturity Tier Acceleration Takeaways

Asset-Backed Issuers and SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Applicability, Disclosures, and Compliance Roadmap

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

UL Certification vs AS9100

GDPR vs ISO 20000

ISO 13485 vs EN 1090