FERPA
U.S. federal law protecting privacy of student education records
ISO 26000
International guidance standard for social responsibility
Quick Verdict
FERPA mandates U.S. student record privacy for funded schools, enforced by funding cuts. ISO 26000 offers voluntary global SR guidance for all organizations, focusing on principles and stakeholder integration for sustainable practices.
FERPA
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974
Key Features
- Grants rights to inspect, amend, and consent to disclosures
- Prohibits PII disclosure without consent or exceptions
- Defines expansive PII including linkable indirect identifiers
- Mandates 45-day access to education records
- Requires annual notifications and disclosure recordkeeping
ISO 26000
ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility
Key Features
- Seven principles underpinning socially responsible behavior
- Seven core subjects for holistic SR coverage
- Explicitly non-certifiable guidance standard
- Stakeholder engagement for issue prioritization
- Integration with existing management systems
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
FERPA Details
What It Is
FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, 20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99) is a U.S. federal regulation protecting privacy of education records and personally identifiable information (PII) for parents and eligible students (age 18+ or postsecondary). It establishes rights-based governance with consent requirements, exceptions, and operational timelines like 45-day access.
Key Components
- **Core rightsInspect/review records, amend inaccurate/misleading info, consent to PII disclosures.
- **DefinitionsBroad education records, expansive PII (direct/indirect/linkable), directory information.
- **Disclosure rulesGeneral consent prohibition + 15+ exceptions (school officials, emergencies, audits).
- **Compliance obligationsAnnual notices, disclosure logs, hearings; enforced via funding leverage, no certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for institutions receiving federal education funds; prevents fund withholding, lawsuits, reputational harm. Builds stakeholder trust, enables safe data sharing/innovation, mitigates vendor risks.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: governance setup, data inventory/classification, role-based training, RBAC/tech controls (MFA/encryption/logging), vendor DPAs/TPRM. Applies to K-12/postsecondary recipients; ongoing audits/incident response, no formal certification.
ISO 26000 Details
What It Is
ISO 26000:2010 is the International Standard providing guidance on social responsibility. It offers a voluntary framework applicable to all organizations, focusing on integrating social responsibility (SR) into governance, strategy, and operations through a holistic, principles-based approach emphasizing context, stakeholder engagement, and impact assessment.
Key Components
- **Seven core subjectsorganizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement.
- **Seven principlesaccountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for stakeholder interests, rule of law, international norms, human rights.
- Built on multi-stakeholder consensus; non-certifiable—no requirements, focuses on guidance and self-assessment.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enhances sustainability commitment, risk management, and stakeholder trust.
- Aligns with SDGs, OECD, GRI for credibility without certification burdens.
- Drives operational resilience, ESG integration, and competitive differentiation.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: materiality assessment, stakeholder engagement, policy integration, training, reporting.
- Suited for all sizes/sectors; integrates with ISO 14001/45001; no audits required, uses transparent communication.
Key Differences
| Aspect | FERPA | ISO 26000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Student education records privacy and PII | Broad social responsibility across 7 core subjects |
| Industry | U.S. education institutions receiving federal funds | All organizations globally, all sectors |
| Nature | Mandatory U.S. federal regulation with enforcement | Voluntary international guidance, non-certifiable |
| Testing | Complaint investigations, no formal certification | Self-assessment, stakeholder engagement, no audits |
| Penalties | Federal funding withholding, enforcement actions | No penalties, reputational risks only |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FERPA and ISO 26000
FERPA FAQ
ISO 26000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The SOC Maturity Roadmap: A 5-Step Blueprint for Scaling from Ad-Hoc to Optimized Operations
Unlock SOC excellence with our 5-step maturity roadmap. Compare SOC-CMM, NIST CSF, and CMMC frameworks to scale from ad-hoc to automated operations. Start your

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights
Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo

Asset-Backed Issuers and SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Applicability, Disclosures, and Compliance Roadmap
How SEC cybersecurity rules apply to asset-backed issuers (ABS): Form 10-D disclosures, ABS-EE risk management, Inline XBRL tagging, exemptions. Roadmap for tru
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
GRI vs AS9110C
Explore GRI vs AS9110C: Sustainability reporting (GRI 403 OHS) meets aerospace MRO quality mgmt. Key diffs in HES compliance, risk & certification. Align for excellence now!
GRI vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Compare GRI Standards vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Decode materiality, governance gaps, and reporting mandates for ESG impacts and cyber incidents. Expert guide to compliance mastery!
ITIL vs ISO 37301
ITIL vs ISO 37301: ITIL 4's 34 practices & SVS align IT services with business via agile ITSM; ISO 37301 certifies risk-based CMS for compliance leadership. Compare to optimize ops now!