FISMA
U.S. federal law for risk-based information security
FSSC 22000
GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme for food safety management systems
Quick Verdict
FISMA mandates risk-based cybersecurity for US federal agencies and contractors via NIST RMF, ensuring compliance and resilience. FSSC 22000 certifies voluntary food safety systems globally using ISO 22000 and PRPs. Organizations adopt FISMA for legal obligations, FSSC for market access.
FISMA
Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014
Key Features
- Mandates NIST RMF 7-step risk management process
- Requires continuous monitoring and diagnostics program
- Enforces FIPS 199 system impact categorization
- Demands annual independent IG assessments
- Extends to federal contractors and supply chains
FSSC 22000
FSSC 22000 Food Safety System Certification
Key Features
- GFSI-benchmarked certification across food chain categories
- Integrates ISO 22000 with sector PRPs and additional requirements
- Mandates food defense and food fraud vulnerability assessments
- Requires validated allergen management and environmental monitoring
- Enforces food safety culture objectives and quality controls
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
FISMA Details
What It Is
Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014 is a U.S. federal law mandating risk-based frameworks for protecting federal information and systems. Modernizing the 2002 act, it emphasizes NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) for continuous security via 7 steps: Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor.
Key Components
- NIST SP 800-53 controls tailored by FIPS 199 impact levels (Low/Moderate/High)
- Continuous monitoring, incident reporting to CISA/OMB
- Agency-wide programs with oversight by CIOs, CISOs, IGs
- Metrics-aligned maturity model for evaluations
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for federal agencies/contractors handling federal data; reduces breach risks, ensures resilience. Enables contract eligibility, builds stakeholder trust, aligns with FedRAMP. Strategic for risk culture, efficiency via automation.
Implementation Overview
Phased RMF: inventory, categorize, implement controls, assess for ATO, monitor continuously. Applies to agencies, contractors; suits all sizes via tailoring. Requires IG audits, POA&Ms; 12-24 months typical.
FSSC 22000 Details
What It Is
FSSC 22000 (Food Safety System Certification 22000) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It applies across food chain categories like manufacturing, packaging, and logistics, using a risk-based PDCA approach integrated with HACCP principles.
Key Components
- Three pillarsISO 22000:2018** (management system), sector-specific PRPs (e.g., ISO/TS 22002 series), and FSSC Additional Requirements (e.g., food defense, fraud, allergens).
- Covers ISO clauses 4–10, PRP controls, and 18+ additional requirements.
- Built on ISO harmonized structure; requires third-party audits by licensed Certification Bodies.
Why Organizations Use It
- Ensures market access via GFSI recognition and buyer requirements.
- Mitigates food safety risks (recalls, contamination); supports SDGs like waste reduction.
- Builds stakeholder trust, reduces audit duplication; enhances reputation globally.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, FSMS design, training, internal audits, certification (Stage 1/2).
- Suits all sizes/industries in food chain; 6–24 months typical.
- Mandatory audits, surveillance; Version 6 emphasizes culture and quality.
Key Differences
| Aspect | FISMA | FSSC 22000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Federal info systems security, risk management | Food safety management, PRPs, HACCP |
| Industry | US federal agencies, contractors, government | Food chain: manufacturing, packaging, logistics global |
| Nature | Mandatory US federal law, NIST RMF framework | Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme |
| Testing | Continuous monitoring, IG annual assessments | CB audits: initial, surveillance, recertification |
| Penalties | Contract loss, debarment, OMB directives | Loss of certification, market access denial |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FISMA and FSSC 22000
FISMA FAQ
FSSC 22000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)
Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo
NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier
SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: Auditor Questions, Red Flags, and Evidence Prep for First-Time Pass
Ace your SOC 2 audit with predicted auditor questions, model answers, red flags, and evidence checklists from CPA best practices & SignWell's journey. Reduce st
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
AS9120B vs ISO 41001
Compare AS9120B vs ISO 41001: Aerospace QMS for distributors meets facility management standard. Uncover key differences in risks, traceability & ops controls. Optimize compliance now!
ISO 27032 vs IFS Food
Compare ISO 27032 vs IFS Food: cybersecurity guidelines vs food safety audits. Uncover compliance strategies, pitfalls, and implementation for resilient ops. Optimize now!
POPIA vs HITRUST CSF
Discover POPIA vs HITRUST CSF: Compare South Africa's GDPR-aligned privacy law with the certifiable security framework. Master compliance gaps, align controls, reduce risks. Dive in now!