FSSC 22000 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
FSSC 22000
GFSI-benchmarked certification for food safety management systems
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
China's mandatory graded cybersecurity protection scheme
Quick Verdict
FSSC 22000 delivers GFSI-recognized food safety certification globally for supply chain trust; MLPS 2.0 mandates graded cybersecurity in China to protect national interests. Companies adopt FSSC for market access, MLPS to avoid legal penalties.
FSSC 22000
Food Safety System Certification 22000 (FSSC 22000)
Key Features
- Three-pillar structure: ISO 22000 + PRPs + Additional Requirements
- GFSI-benchmarked for global food chain acceptance
- Mandatory food defense and fraud vulnerability assessments
- Validated allergen controls with environmental monitoring
- Food safety culture and quality objectives required
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0
Key Features
- Five-level impact-based system classification
- Mandatory PSB registration and audits for Level 2+
- Technical controls for cloud, IoT, ICS
- Governance and personnel security requirements
- Ongoing re-evaluations and enforcement by police
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
FSSC 22000 Details
What It Is
FSSC 22000 (Food Safety System Certification 22000) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It applies across food chain categories like manufacturing, packaging, and logistics. The primary purpose is ensuring safe food via integrated hazard control. It uses a PDCA-based, risk-focused approach from ISO 22000:2018.
Key Components
- Three pillars: ISO 22000:2018 clauses 4-10, sector-specific PRPs (e.g., ISO/TS 22002 series), FSSC Additional Requirements (e.g., food defense, fraud, allergens).
- Overlaps ISO clauses, PRP controls, 18+ additional requirements.
- Built on HACCP principles within management system framework.
- Certification via licensed bodies per ISO 22003-1:2022.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets retailer mandates, enables global trade.
- Reduces recalls, enhances supply chain trust.
- Manages risks like adulteration, contamination.
- Builds reputation via public register.
- Aligns with SDGs for sustainability.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, FSMS design, training, audits.
- Involves hazard analysis, PRP verification, culture programs.
- Suits all sizes in food sectors worldwide.
- Requires initial/recertification audits, surveillance.
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details
What It Is
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's legally mandated cybersecurity framework under the 2017 Cybersecurity Law (Article 21). It requires network operators to classify systems into five protection levels based on potential harm to national security, social order, and public interests, implementing graded technical, organizational, and governance controls.
Key Components
- Core domains: physical security, network protection, data security, access control, monitoring, and governance.
- Standards like GB/T 22239-2019, GB/T 25070-2019 define baselines; extended for cloud, IoT, ICS.
- Five levels with escalating requirements; Levels 2+ need third-party audits (70/100 score) and PSB approval.
- Compliance model: self-classification, expert review, registration, periodic re-evaluations.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for all China-based networks; non-compliance risks fines, suspensions.
- Enhances resilience, supports market access, aligns with data laws (DSL, PIPL).
- Builds regulator trust, reduces breach risks; strategic for multinationals.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scoping, classification, gap analysis, remediation, audits, ongoing monitoring.
- Applies to all sizes/industries in China; complex for foreign firms.
- Involves PSB filings, annual audits for Level 3+ (180 words).
Key Differences
| Aspect | FSSC 22000 | MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Food safety management systems, PRPs, additional requirements | Graded cybersecurity for all networks and systems |
| Industry | Global food chain categories (manufacturing, packaging, etc.) | All sectors in China (networks, cloud, IoT, ICS) |
| Nature | GFSI-benchmarked voluntary certification scheme | Mandatory legal regime enforced by PSBs |
| Testing | CB audits (ISO 22003), surveillance/recertification cycles | Third-party assessments (Level 2+), PSB inspections |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, market access restrictions | Fines, operational suspension, license revocation |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FSSC 22000 and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
FSSC 22000 FAQ
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists
Discover 10 common SOC 2 Type 2 audit pitfalls like evidence gaps, scope creep, vendor oversights. Get Fail/Pass visuals, client stories, checklists for 95% fir
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 Private Sector Tailoring Blueprint: First 5 Steps to Overlay-Driven Compliance with Infographic
Step-by-step blueprint for private sector NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 tailoring using overlays for AI & supply chain risks. Infographic + first 5 steps for ROI-drive
CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Explore More Comparisons
See how FSSC 22000 and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) compare against other standards