What is the primary objective of **GDPR**?

**The primary objective of **GDPR** is to protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons, particularly their right to the protection of personal data, while ensuring the free movement of personal data within the EU.** Enacted as Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and enforceable since May 25, 2018, it replaces the 1995 Data Protection Directive to harmonize rules across member states, addressing digital-age challenges like big data and cross-border flows through principles in Article 5, including lawfulness, purpose limitation, data minimization, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity/confidentiality, and accountability.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **GDPR**?

**GDPR applies to any controller or processor established in the EU, or any non-EU entity offering goods/services to or monitoring behavior of EU data subjects, regardless of location.** Article 3 defines this extraterritorial scope, covering data controllers (determining processing purposes) and processors (processing on controllers' behalf). Mandatory Data Protection Officers (DPOs) are required under Article 37 for public authorities or entities conducting large-scale systematic monitoring of special categories of data.

Does **GDPR** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, GDPR does not mandate external audits or third-party certification for compliance.** Article 42 encourages voluntary certification mechanisms, seals, or marks to demonstrate compliance with its requirements, but these are optional. Organizations must instead demonstrate accountability through internal measures like Records of Processing Activities (Article 30) and Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) for high-risk processing (Article 35).

How often should an assessment for **GDPR** be performed?

**GDPR requires ongoing, risk-based assessments rather than fixed intervals, with Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) conducted prior to high-risk processing and reviewed if risks change.** Article 35 mandates DPIAs for systematic monitoring, large-scale special category data processing, or evaluations based on automated decisions. Article 32 demands continuous evaluation of security measures considering the state of the art, costs, and risks, ensuring dynamic compliance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **GDPR**?

**Non-compliance with GDPR can result in administrative fines up to €20 million or 4% of total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher, for severe infringements.** Article 83 establishes a two-tier penalty structure: up to €10 million or 2% for lesser violations (e.g., records obligations), and the higher tier for core principles like lawful processing or data subject rights breaches. Supervisory authorities also impose reprimands, orders, and processing bans, with individuals able to seek judicial remedies.

Can **GDPR** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, GDPR principles such as accountability, data minimization, and data subject rights have influenced and can be mapped to international frameworks like Brazil's LGPD, California's CCPA, and Japan's APPI.** Its global reach via extraterritoriality and adequacy decisions (Article 45) has established it as a benchmark, enabling adequacy for data transfers to countries providing equivalent protection, though mappings require case-by-case analysis of divergences like opt-out vs. opt-in consent models.

What is the first step to begin implementing **GDPR**?

**The first step to implement GDPR is to conduct a comprehensive data mapping exercise to identify all personal data processing activities, legal bases, and associated risks.** This informs Records of Processing Activities (Article 30) and determines needs for DPIAs (Article 35) or DPO appointment (Article 37), establishing the foundation for accountability under Article 5(2) and privacy by design/default (Article 25).

What is the primary objective of **SOC 2**?

**The primary objective of SOC 2 is to provide independent assurance that a service organization's controls meet the Trust Services Criteria (TSC) for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.** Developed by the AICPA, SOC 2 evaluates systems handling customer data, with Security (CC1-CC9) as the mandatory common criteria. Type 2 reports assess design and operating effectiveness over 3-12 months, delivering evidence of sustained performance via controls like IAM, encryption, and incident response.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SOC 2**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with SOC 2, as it is a voluntary AICPA framework, but service organizations like SaaS, cloud, and data processors face professional mandates from enterprise clients.** Targeted at providers storing, processing, or transmitting customer data, it is demanded in RFPs, MSAs, and vendor risk assessments by Fortune 500 firms. Startups scaling to $5K+ ACV deals and sectors like fintech/HR tech must comply to avoid deal disqualification.

Does **SOC 2** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SOC 2 requires an external audit by an independent AICPA-accredited CPA firm to issue Type 1 or Type 2 attestation reports.** Type 1 verifies control design at a point in time; Type 2 tests operating effectiveness over 3-12 months via sampling, walkthroughs, and evidence review. No formal certification exists—reports provide the assurance, with unqualified opinions signaling robust TSC alignment.

How often should an assessment for **SOC 2** be performed?

**SOC 2 Type 2 assessments should be performed annually to capture a full review period and maintain trust.** The monitoring period is typically 3-12 months (minimum 3), followed by audit fieldwork; bridge letters from management extend validity up to 3 months between reports. Continuous monitoring ensures ongoing evidence for recertification.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SOC 2**?

**Non-compliance with client-mandated SOC 2 results in deal disqualification, extended sales cycles (3-6 months), and heightened breach liability exceeding $1M per incident.** No AICPA fines apply, but absent Type 2 reports trigger exhaustive VRM scrutiny, custom contracts, reputational damage, and lost revenue—70-80% of enterprise SaaS deals require it.

Can **SOC 2** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SOC 2 maps effectively to frameworks like ISO 27001 (80% control overlap), NIST CSF, and others via AICPA spreadsheets.** Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) align with ISO Annex A, enabling shared evidence for multi-compliance without dual audits. This reduces redundancy for global SaaS pursuing hybrid programs.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SOC 2**?

**The first step to implement SOC 2 is a scoping exercise and gap analysis against the Trust Services Criteria.** Define in-scope systems, data flows, and TSC (starting with mandatory Security), then engage a CPA for readiness assessment ($5-10K). Inventory assets and map ~50-100 controls using tools like Vanta for prioritized remediation.

GDPR vs SOC 2 | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

GDPR

Mandatory

2016

EU regulation protecting personal data privacy rights

SOC 2

Voluntary

2010

AICPA framework for service organization trust controls

Quick Verdict

GDPR mandates comprehensive personal data protection for EU residents globally, with strict fines for non-compliance. SOC 2 voluntarily attests service organizations' controls via audits. Companies adopt GDPR for legal duty, SOC 2 for enterprise trust and sales acceleration.

Data Privacy

GDPR

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 General Data Protection Regulation

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Applies extraterritorially to non-EU entities targeting EU residents
Mandates accountability principle with demonstrable compliance measures
Imposes fines up to 4% of global annual turnover
Grants enhanced data subject rights including erasure
Requires 72-hour personal data breach notifications

Cybersecurity / Trust

SOC 2

System and Organization Controls 2 (SOC 2)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Mandatory Security TSC with CC1-CC9 common controls
Type 2 reports prove operating effectiveness over time
Optional criteria for availability, confidentiality, privacy
Independent CPA firm audit attestations
Overlaps 80% with ISO 27001 and GDPR

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

GDPR Details

What It Is

Regulation (EU) 2016/679, known as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), is a directly applicable EU law. It protects natural persons' personal data across the EU and extraterritorially. Primary purpose: harmonize data privacy, ensure lawful processing, and enable free data flows. Employs risk-based accountability approach with seven core principles.

Key Components

Seven principles: lawfulness, purpose limitation, minimization, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity/confidentiality, accountability.
Data subject rights: access, rectification, erasure, portability, objection.
Obligations: DPO appointment, DPIAs, breach notifications, records of processing.
Enforcement via DPAs, one-stop-shop, fines up to 4% global turnover.

Why Organizations Use It

Legal compliance mandatory for EU data processors; mitigates fines/reputational risks. Enhances trust, enables Digital Single Market participation. Provides competitive edge via privacy-by-design; influences global standards like LGPD, CCPA.

Implementation Overview

Risk assessments, policy updates, training, audits. Applies universally to controllers/processors handling EU data. No certification but ongoing DPA compliance; SMEs face high burdens, multinationals need global alignment. Typical: 18-24 months initial rollout.

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary framework by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) evaluating service organizations' controls for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. It employs a risk-based, control-focused approach via Trust Services Criteria (TSC).

Key Components

**Five TSCSecurity (mandatory, CC1-CC9 common criteria), Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy
50-100 controls per scope, built on COSO principles
Type 1 (point-in-time design) and Type 2 (operating effectiveness over 3-12 months) reports
CPA-attested compliance model with annual recertification

Why Organizations Use It

Fulfills enterprise vendor risk management demands
Accelerates sales, cuts due diligence by 80-90%
Mitigates breach risks, boosts uptime to 99.99%
Builds stakeholder trust, investor confidence
Competitive edge for SaaS/cloud providers

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping, gap analysis, control deployment/automation, monitoring, audit
Targets tech service orgs (SaaS, fintech); scales startups to enterprises
Tools like Vanta automate evidence; CPA audits required (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	GDPR	SOC 2
Scope	Personal data protection, rights, processing	Trust services: security, availability, privacy
Industry	All sectors, EU/global reach	Service orgs like SaaS, cloud providers
Nature	Mandatory EU regulation	Voluntary AICPA audit framework
Testing	DPIAs, compliance demonstrations	Type 2 audits by CPAs annually
Penalties	Up to 4% global turnover fines	No fines, loss of attestation

Scope

GDPR

Personal data protection, rights, processing

SOC 2

Trust services: security, availability, privacy

Industry

GDPR

All sectors, EU/global reach

SOC 2

Service orgs like SaaS, cloud providers

Nature

GDPR

Mandatory EU regulation

SOC 2

Voluntary AICPA audit framework

Testing

GDPR

DPIAs, compliance demonstrations

SOC 2

Type 2 audits by CPAs annually

Penalties

GDPR

Up to 4% global turnover fines

SOC 2

No fines, loss of attestation

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about GDPR and SOC 2

GDPR FAQ

SOC 2 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Audit Survival Secrets for Your First SOC 2 Type 2: What Auditors Really Check (and How to Pass)

Master your first SOC 2 Type 2 audit with proven strategies: 40-sample testing, vendor gaps, CPA walkthroughs. Get checklists, scripts & tips from SignWell to s

What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?

Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2

Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 28000 vs SAMA CSF

Compare ISO 28000 vs SAMA CSF: Decode supply chain security mgmt (ISO 28000) & Saudi financial cyber resilience frameworks. Boost compliance & risk posture—dive in now!

SQF vs ISO 27017

Compare SQF vs ISO 27017: GFSI food safety's HACCP modules vs cloud security's shared controls. Ensure compliance, reduce risks—discover which drives your success.

ENERGY STAR vs ISO 30301

Discover ENERGY STAR vs ISO 30301: EPA's trusted energy efficiency benchmark for products/buildings vs global records management system standard. Compare, comply, excel!

GDPR

SOC 2

Quick Verdict

GDPR

Key Features

SOC 2

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

GDPR Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

GDPR FAQ

What is the primary objective of GDPR?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with GDPR?

Does GDPR require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for GDPR be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with GDPR?

Can GDPR be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing GDPR?

SOC 2 FAQ

What is the primary objective of SOC 2?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SOC 2?

Does SOC 2 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SOC 2 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SOC 2?

Can SOC 2 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SOC 2?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Audit Survival Secrets for Your First SOC 2 Type 2: What Auditors Really Check (and How to Pass)

What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 28000 vs SAMA CSF

SQF vs ISO 27017

ENERGY STAR vs ISO 30301