GLBA
US federal law for financial privacy and safeguards
AS9110C
International standard for aviation maintenance quality management systems
Quick Verdict
GLBA mandates privacy notices and security programs for financial firms protecting NPI, while AS9110C is a voluntary QMS certification for aviation MROs ensuring maintenance quality and airworthiness. Organizations adopt GLBA for legal compliance, AS9110C for market access.
GLBA
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)
Key Features
- Mandates privacy notices and opt-out for NPI sharing
- Requires comprehensive written information security program
- Designates Qualified Individual with board reporting
- Imposes 30-day breach notification to FTC
- Demands rigorous service provider oversight controls
AS9110C
AS9110C Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance
Key Features
- Risk-based thinking in planning and operations
- Configuration management and traceability controls
- Counterfeit and suspect parts prevention
- Human factors in root cause analysis
- Maintenance release and preservation requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
GLBA Details
What It Is
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) is a US federal regulation enacted in 1999. It establishes baseline protections for consumer financial privacy and data security. Primary scope covers financial institutions handling nonpublic personal information (NPI). Adopts a risk-based approach via Privacy Rule and Safeguards Rule.
Key Components
- **Privacy Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 313)notices, opt-outs for nonaffiliated sharing.
- **Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314)written security program with administrative, technical, physical safeguards.
- **Pretexting provisionsanti-social engineering protections. Built on transparency, choice, security; enforced by FTC for non-banks; no certification, compliance via audits/enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for financial entities; reduces breach risks, penalties up to $100k/violation. Enhances trust, operational resilience, vendor management. Provides competitive edge via proven safeguards.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping, risk assessment, controls (encryption, MFA), training, testing. Applies broadly to banks, fintech, tax firms; FTC oversight with breach reporting.
AS9110C Details
What It Is
AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is an international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation maintenance organizations, such as repair stations and MRO providers. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements using a risk-based thinking approach and Annex SL high-level structure across Clauses 4–10.
Key Components
- Core pillars: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, traceability, preservation.
- Follows PDCA logic; requires documented information, no exclusions without justification.
- Certification via IAQG OASIS after audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Ensures continuing airworthiness and regulatory compliance (e.g., FAA/EASA).
- Mitigates safety risks, enhances on-time delivery and customer satisfaction.
- Provides market access to OEMs/contracts; builds stakeholder trust.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months typical).
- Applies to MROs globally; requires operational maturity, internal audits, management reviews before certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | GLBA | AS9110C |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Consumer financial privacy and data security | Aerospace maintenance quality management system |
| Industry | Financial institutions (broad, non-banks included) | Aviation MRO/repair stations worldwide |
| Nature | Mandatory U.S. federal regulation with FTC enforcement | Voluntary IAQG certification standard |
| Testing | Risk assessments, pen tests, vulnerability scans | Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits |
| Penalties | Civil fines up to $100k/violation, imprisonment | Loss of certification, market exclusion |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about GLBA and AS9110C
GLBA FAQ
AS9110C FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Image this: What if GDPR would have NOT been implemented by the EU
What if the EU never implemented GDPR? Explore this hypothetical: consumer data protection in Dec 2025, key differences, pros/cons for users & companies. Read t
From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day
Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate
CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)
Tactical CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 playbook for ransomware resilience. 30-60-90 day sprint with tool-agnostic tasks, ownership & evidence checklists to prove progre
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
SOC 2 vs CIS Controls
Discover SOC 2 vs CIS Controls: Audit-driven SOC 2 ensures service org trust via TSC; CIS's 18 safeguards deliver prioritized cyber hygiene. Unlock compliance insights—compare now for your security edge!
ITIL vs C-TPAT
Discover ITIL vs C-TPAT: Compare ITIL's proven IT service management framework with C-TPAT's supply chain security standards. Unlock insights for resilient operations. Learn more now!
ISO 37301 vs C-TPAT
ISO 37301 vs C-TPAT: Certifiable compliance systems meet trusted trader security. Optimize risk, governance, certification & trade efficiency. Discover key differences now!