HIPAA
US regulation protecting health information privacy and security
GDPR UK
UK regulation for personal data protection and privacy.
Quick Verdict
HIPAA governs US healthcare PHI privacy and security via rules like Privacy and Security Rules, while GDPR UK mandates broad personal data protection across sectors with principles and rights. US providers adopt HIPAA for compliance; UK firms use GDPR UK to avoid massive fines and build trust.
HIPAA
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
Key Features
- 1. Risk-based safeguards for ePHI confidentiality, integrity, availability
- 2. Minimum necessary principle limiting PHI uses and disclosures
- 3. Presumption-of-breach model with four-factor risk assessment
- 4. Direct liability for business associates and subcontractors
- 5. Individual rights to access, amend, and account for PHI
GDPR UK
UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR)
Key Features
- Seven core data processing principles
- Enforceable individual data subject rights
- Accountability requiring demonstrable compliance
- 72-hour ICO breach notification requirement
- Mandatory DPIAs for high-risk processing
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
HIPAA Details
What It Is
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) is a US federal regulation establishing national standards for protecting protected health information (PHI). It includes the Privacy Rule, Security Rule, and Breach Notification Rule, employing a flexible, risk-based approach to enable healthcare operations while safeguarding privacy.
Key Components
- Privacy Rule (45 CFR Part 164 Subparts A/E): Permitted/authorized PHI uses/disclosures, minimum necessary, patient rights.
- Security Rule (Subparts A/C): Administrative, physical, technical safeguards for ePHI; risk analysis required.
- Breach Notification Rule (Subparts A/D): Presumption-of-breach notifications within 60 days.
- Business associate governance, enforcement via OCR. No certification; compliance audited.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for covered entities (providers, plans, clearinghouses) and business associates.
- Mitigates breach risks, penalties (up to $2M+ annually), reputational harm.
- Builds patient trust, enables secure data flows, supports competitive partnerships.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis/risk assessment, safeguard deployment (policies, training, MFA, encryption), continuous monitoring/audits. Scalable for all healthcare sizes nationwide; ongoing program with 6-year documentation.
GDPR UK Details
What It Is
UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) is the UK's post-Brexit adaptation of EU GDPR, a binding regulation with the Data Protection Act 2018. It governs personal data processing by controllers and processors established in or targeting the UK. Employs a risk-based, accountability-driven approach emphasizing demonstrable compliance.
Key Components
- **Seven principleslawfulness/fairness/transparency, purpose limitation, data minimisation, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity/confidentiality, accountability.
- Data subject rights (access, rectification, erasure, portability, objection).
- Obligations: lawful bases, RoPA, DPIAs, security, breach notification, processor contracts.
- ICO enforcement; fines to £17.5M or 4% global turnover.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory legal compliance for UK data handlers.
- Mitigates fines/reputation risks.
- Builds stakeholder trust, enables secure data use.
- Supports innovation via privacy-by-design.
Implementation Overview
Phased: governance setup, RoPA/data mapping, policies/contracts, training, DPIAs, audits. Applies universally to organizations handling UK personal data; ICO audits, no certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | HIPAA | GDPR UK |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | PHI privacy, security, breach notification for ePHI | All personal data processing principles, rights, transfers |
| Industry | US healthcare entities, business associates | All sectors processing UK personal data |
| Nature | US federal regulations with OCR enforcement | UK regulation with ICO enforcement, fines |
| Testing | Risk analysis, periodic evaluations, audits | DPIAs for high-risk, ongoing monitoring |
| Penalties | Civil penalties up to $2M per year, settlements | Fines up to £17.5M or 4% global turnover |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about HIPAA and GDPR UK
HIPAA FAQ
GDPR UK FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 materiality determinations with our step-by-step framework, checklists, case law factors, and real-world examples. Avoid enforceme
Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)
Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISA 95 vs ISO 13485
Compare ISA 95 vs ISO 13485: ISA-95 integrates ERP-MES via Purdue levels & activity models; ISO 13485 enforces risk-based QMS for med devices. Optimize compliance—read now!
WEEE vs ISO 28000
Discover WEEE vs ISO 28000: EU directive mandates e-waste collection (65-85% targets) & EPR, while ISO 28000 builds resilient supply chain security. Compare compliance now!
K-PIPA vs Basel III
Explore K-PIPA vs Basel III: Contrast Korea's consent-driven privacy law with banking capital/liquidity rules. Unlock compliance strategies, risks & best practices for resilient ops now.