What is the primary objective of **HITRUST CSF**?

**The primary objective of HITRUST CSF is to provide a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework that harmonizes requirements from over 60 authoritative sources into a single assess-once-report-many assurance program.** It consolidates controls across 19 assessment domains and a hierarchical taxonomy of 14 categories, 49 objectives, and approximately 156 specifications, enabling risk-based tailoring via organizational, system, and regulatory factors. The framework uses a five-level maturity model (Policy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed) to ensure operational effectiveness, supported by the MyCSF platform for scoping, evidence management, and validated certification.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **HITRUST CSF**?

**No organization is legally mandated to comply with HITRUST CSF, as it is a voluntary, industry-agnostic framework.** Professionally, it is required by contract for healthcare business associates, covered entities, payers, providers, and vendors handling ePHI/PHI, where customers demand certified assurance to reduce third-party risk. Adoption extends to financial services, cloud providers, and any entity processing sensitive data, driven by stakeholder expectations for standardized reports via RDS, rather than statutory mandates.

Does **HITRUST CSF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**HITRUST CSF requires external audits by Authorized External Assessors for validated assessments and certification.** Self-assessments via MyCSF provide readiness insights but lack third-party validation. Certification (e1: 44 controls, 1-year; i1: 182 requirements, 1-year; r2: tailored, 2-year with interim) demands evidence-based testing (documentation, interviews, technical scans), assessor submission, and HITRUST centralized QA review, producing standardized reports for relying parties.

How often should an assessment for **HITRUST CSF** be performed?

**HITRUST CSF validated assessments must be performed according to certification validity: e1 and i1 annually, r2 every two years with a mandatory interim assessment at one year.** Readiness self-assessments can occur anytime via MyCSF for gap analysis. Recertification requires ongoing evidence of control operation, maturity scoring at 3+ (72–79 range in legacy model), and adaptation to CSF updates, ensuring continuous compliance amid evolving threats.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **HITRUST CSF**?

**Non-compliance with HITRUST CSF results in no direct legal penalties, as it is voluntary, but leads to lost contracts, exclusion from healthcare ecosystems, and heightened third-party risk exposure.** Organizations forfeit "assess once, report many" efficiency, face duplicative audits, elevated cyber insurance premiums, and reputational damage. Certified environments report 99.4% breach-free rates over two years, underscoring indirect risks of uncertified postures in regulated supply chains.

Can **HITRUST CSF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, HITRUST CSF includes built-in mappings to over 60 frameworks, enabling requirement-level rollups for HIPAA, NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001/27002, SOC 2, PCI DSS, GDPR, and others via MyCSF Insights Reports.** This supports "assess once, report many" without manual translation, with cross-references traceable from 19 domains to specific standards, reducing audit fatigue while maintaining centralized assurance.

What is the first step to begin implementing **HITRUST CSF**?

**The first step to implement HITRUST CSF is to access MyCSF for scoping via structured questionnaires on organizational, system, and regulatory risk factors.** This generates a tailored control set, inheritance opportunities (e.g., 60–85% from cloud providers), and readiness assessment baseline, informing remediation priorities across 19 domains before engaging assessors.

What is the primary objective of **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C's primary objective is to define quality management system requirements for aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) organizations to ensure consistent conformity to customer and regulatory requirements.** It builds on ISO 9001:2015 using the High Level Structure, embedding aerospace-specific controls for configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, risk-based thinking, and continuing airworthiness. Certification demonstrates operational effectiveness through PDCA cycles, enabling OASIS listing and supply-chain access.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C applies to MRO organizations performing maintenance on commercial, private, or military aircraft, including repair stations and OEM MRO divisions.** It targets entities needing to align QMS with EASA/FAA Part-145 regulations and customer contracts; certification is often mandated by OEMs, airlines, and primes for supplier qualification, regardless of size.

Does **AS9110C** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9110C requires third-party certification by an accredited registrar following Stage 1 (documentation review) and Stage 2 (on-site effectiveness audit).** Internal audits and management review with 3+ months of operational data are prerequisites; surveillance audits occur annually, recertification every 3 years.

How often should an assessment for **AS9110C** be performed?

**Internal audits for AS9110C must be performed at planned intervals based on process risk, with critical maintenance processes audited more frequently.** Management reviews occur regularly, tied to business cycles; full QMS exercise (audits and reviews) is required before certification, with ongoing surveillance audits annually post-certification.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9110C**?

**Non-compliance with AS9110C risks regulatory sanctions like FAA/EASA Part-145 certificate suspension, fines up to $100k per day, contract termination, and litigation from airworthiness failures.** It leads to market exclusion from OEM/airline bids, OASIS delisting, reputational damage, and operational costs from rework or AOG events.

Can **AS9110C** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9110C maps directly to ISO 9001:2015 via shared High Level Structure and PDCA, facilitating integrated QMS.** IAQG correlation matrices align it with regulatory frameworks like EASA/FAA Part-145, enabling single-system compliance without exclusions where applicable.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9110C**?

**The first step for AS9110C implementation is a disciplined gap analysis using clause-mapping checklists against existing processes and regulatory mappings.** Secure executive sponsorship, define QMS scope via a signed SOW, and produce a prioritized gap register to initiate phased rollout.

HITRUST CSF vs AS9110C

Standards Comparison

HITRUST CSF

Voluntary

2022

Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards

AS9110C

Mandatory

2016

Aerospace QMS standard for aircraft maintenance organizations.

Quick Verdict

HITRUST CSF delivers certifiable security assurance for healthcare via risk-tailored controls and maturity scoring, while AS9110C ensures quality management for aviation MRO with airworthiness and traceability focus. Organizations adopt them for compliance, market access, and operational resilience.

Information Security

HITRUST CSF

HITRUST Common Security Framework

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Harmonizes 60+ frameworks into certifiable assessment
Risk-based tailoring via structured factors
Five-level maturity model for controls
Tiered certifications e1/i1/r2 pathways
MyCSF platform with inheritance support

Quality Management

AS9110C

AS9110C: QMS Requirements for Aviation Maintenance Organizations

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Risk-based thinking embedded in planning and operations
Counterfeit parts prevention and detection controls
Configuration management and traceability requirements
Human factors integration in competence and audits
Maintenance release and airworthiness process controls

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

HITRUST CSF Details

What It Is

HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework consolidating requirements from 60+ standards like HIPAA, NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and GDPR. Primarily for healthcare but industry-agnostic, it uses risk-based tailoring and maturity scoring.

Key Components

19 assessment domains (e.g., Access Control, Risk Management)
Hierarchical structure: 14 categories, 49 objectives, ~156 specifications
Five-level maturity model: Policy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed
Tiered certifications: e1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored)
MyCSF platform for scoping, evidence, remediation

Why Organizations Use It

Unified compliance: assess once, report many
Third-party assurance reduces questionnaires/audits
99.4% breach-free rate in certified environments
Market differentiation, lower insurance premiums
Risk management via inheritance from cloud providers

Implementation Overview

Multi-phase: scoping, readiness, remediation, validated assessment by authorized assessors, HITRUST QA. Suited for regulated industries, any size; requires policies, evidence, 90-day operation. 6-18 months typical.

AS9110C Details

What It Is

AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is an international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) organizations. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 using the High-Level Structure (HLS) and PDCA cycle, embedding risk-based thinking (RBT) and aerospace-specific controls for safety-critical maintenance processes.

Key Components

Core clauses 4-10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, maintenance release, supplier controls.
Built on ISO 9001 with ~20 MRO-specific requirements.
Certification via accredited registrars with Stage 1/2 audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignment (FAA/EASA Part-145).
Mitigates safety risks, reduces rework/AOG events.
Enhances market access, operational efficiency, stakeholder trust.
Drives continual improvement via KPIs and audits.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, pilot, rollout, audits.
6-12 months typical for mid-size MROs.
Applies globally to MROs; requires internal audits, management reviews before certification.

Key Differences

Aspect	HITRUST CSF	AS9110C
Scope	Security/privacy controls, 19 domains, maturity scoring	Aerospace MRO QMS, maintenance processes, airworthiness
Industry	Healthcare/regulated sectors, industry-agnostic	Aviation maintenance/repair/overhaul organizations
Nature	Certifiable security framework, voluntary assurance	Quality management standard, voluntary certification
Testing	Validated assessments by external assessors, MyCSF platform	Internal audits, management reviews, certification body audits
Penalties	Loss of certification, market exclusion	Loss of certification, regulatory/contractual risks

Scope

HITRUST CSF

Security/privacy controls, 19 domains, maturity scoring

AS9110C

Aerospace MRO QMS, maintenance processes, airworthiness

Industry

HITRUST CSF

Healthcare/regulated sectors, industry-agnostic

AS9110C

Aviation maintenance/repair/overhaul organizations

Nature

HITRUST CSF

Certifiable security framework, voluntary assurance

AS9110C

Quality management standard, voluntary certification

Testing

HITRUST CSF

Validated assessments by external assessors, MyCSF platform

AS9110C

Internal audits, management reviews, certification body audits

Penalties

HITRUST CSF

Loss of certification, market exclusion

AS9110C

Loss of certification, regulatory/contractual risks

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about HITRUST CSF and AS9110C

HITRUST CSF FAQ

AS9110C FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Measuring CIS Controls v8.1 in the Real World: KPIs, Dashboards, and Automated Evidence for Continuous Assurance

Master CIS Controls v8.1 measurement with essential KPIs, executive-ready dashboards, and automated evidence collection for continuous assurance. Make complianc

Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption

Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity

Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

UAE PDPL vs TOGAF

Unlock UAE PDPL vs TOGAF: Align data privacy laws with enterprise architecture for seamless compliance. Key gaps, strategies & DPIA tips to thrive. Dive in now!

FSSC 22000 vs ISO 27018

FSSC 22000 vs ISO 27018: GFSI food safety scheme vs cloud PII privacy code. Compare scopes, requirements, benefits for top compliance. Discover now!

DORA vs ISO 55001

Discover DORA vs ISO 55001: Financial ICT resilience regulation meets asset management excellence. Compare scopes, PDCA alignment, leadership mandates—boost compliance & value today!

HITRUST CSF

AS9110C

Quick Verdict

HITRUST CSF

Key Features

AS9110C

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

HITRUST CSF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

AS9110C Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

HITRUST CSF FAQ

What is the primary objective of HITRUST CSF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with HITRUST CSF?

Does HITRUST CSF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for HITRUST CSF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with HITRUST CSF?

Can HITRUST CSF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing HITRUST CSF?

AS9110C FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9110C?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9110C?

Does AS9110C require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9110C be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9110C?

Can AS9110C be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9110C?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Measuring CIS Controls v8.1 in the Real World: KPIs, Dashboards, and Automated Evidence for Continuous Assurance

Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

UAE PDPL vs TOGAF

FSSC 22000 vs ISO 27018

DORA vs ISO 55001