What is the primary objective of **HITRUST CSF**?

**The primary objective of HITRUST CSF is to provide a certifiable, threat-adaptive control library that harmonizes requirements from over 60 authoritative sources into a single assurance program enabling "assess once, report many."** It consolidates controls across 19 assessment domains and a hierarchical taxonomy of 14 categories, 49 objectives, and approximately 156 specifications, using risk-based tailoring via organizational, system, and regulatory factors. The framework employs a five-level maturity model (Policy 15pts, Process 20pts, Implemented 40pts, Measured 10pts, Managed 15pts) to ensure operational effectiveness, supported by the MyCSF platform for scoping, evidence management, and validated certification.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **HITRUST CSF**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with HITRUST CSF, as it is a voluntary, industry-agnostic framework; however, it is professionally mandated by contracts in healthcare ecosystems for covered entities, business associates, payers, providers, and vendors handling ePHI/PHI.** Adoption is driven by customer requirements from insurers, providers, and regulated sectors like financial services, where certified assurance reduces third-party risk management friction via standardized reports shared through RDS.

Does **HITRUST CSF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, HITRUST CSF requires validated assessments by Authorized External Assessors for certification, culminating in HITRUST centralized quality assurance review.** Pathways include e1 (44 controls, 1-year), i1 (182 requirements, 1-year), and r2 (tailored, 2-year with interim), involving evidence-based testing (documentation, interviews, technical scans) submitted via MyCSF; self-assessments provide readiness but not certifiable assurance.

How often should an assessment for **HITRUST CSF** be performed?

**HITRUST CSF validated assessments must be performed according to certification validity: e1 and i1 annually, r2 every two years with a mandatory interim assessment at one year.** Ongoing maintenance via MyCSF supports continuous monitoring, evidence refresh, and adaptation to quarterly threat-adaptive CSF updates.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **HITRUST CSF**?

**Non-compliance with HITRUST CSF results in no direct legal penalties, as it is voluntary, but leads to lost contracts, exclusion from healthcare ecosystems, higher cyber insurance premiums, and increased third-party audit costs.** Certified organizations report 99.4% breach-free rates over two years, making non-adoption a competitive and risk management disadvantage.

An **HITRUST CSF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, HITRUST CSF includes built-in mappings to over 60 frameworks including HIPAA, NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001/27002, PCI DSS, GDPR, SOC 2, and FedRAMP, enabling MyCSF-generated scorecards for "assess once, report many" compliance.** Cross-references roll up maturity scores to external standards without separate audits.

What is the first step to begin implementing **HITRUST CSF**?

**The first step to implement HITRUST CSF is to access MyCSF for scoping via structured questionnaires on organizational, system, and regulatory risk factors to generate a tailored control set.** This defines inheritance opportunities, assessment type (e1/i1/r2), and remediation roadmap.

What is the primary objective of **GLBA**?

**The primary objective of GLBA is to require financial institutions to explain their information-sharing practices and safeguard customers’ nonpublic personal information (NPI).** Enacted in 1999, GLBA’s Title V mandates transparency via the **Privacy Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 313)**—requiring initial and annual notices plus opt-out rights for nonaffiliated third-party sharing—and security via the **Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314)**, demanding a written information security program with administrative, technical, and physical safeguards.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **GLBA**?

**GLBA applies to any “financial institution” under FTC jurisdiction that is significantly engaged in financial activities and handles NPI.** This broad, activity-based scope includes non-banks like mortgage lenders, payday lenders, debt collectors, tax preparation firms, check cashers, and auto dealers arranging financing; exemptions apply for entities with fewer than 5,000 customers from certain written requirements.

Does **GLBA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, GLBA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** The **Safeguards Rule** requires internal processes like periodic risk assessments, vulnerability scans, and annual penetration testing of critical systems, plus designation of a **Qualified Individual** for program oversight and annual board reporting; evidence of these (e.g., test results, remediation records) satisfies regulators.

How often should an assessment for **GLBA** be performed?

**GLBA assessments must be performed periodically—at least annually—and upon material changes in operations, technology, or threats.** The revised **Safeguards Rule** mandates written risk assessments inventorying NPI, evaluating threats, and reassessing service providers; combine with semi-annual vulnerability scans and annual penetration testing for compliance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **GLBA**?

**Non-compliance with GLBA exposes institutions to civil penalties up to $100,000 per violation, $10,000 per violation for individuals, and up to 5 years imprisonment for willful acts.** FTC enforcement (e.g., Equifax, PayPal) includes multimillion-dollar settlements, injunctive relief, remediation, and reputational harm; post-May 13, 2024, breaches affecting 500+ consumers require FTC notification within 30 days.

Can **GLBA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, GLBA elements map directly to frameworks like NIST CSF and ISO 27001.** The **Safeguards Rule**’s nine program elements—risk assessment, access controls, encryption, MFA, incident response, vendor oversight—align with NIST SP 800-53 controls and ISO 27001 Annex A, enabling integrated compliance without independent standards mention.

What is the first step to begin implementing **GLBA**?

**The first step is to designate a Qualified Individual to develop and oversee the information security program.** Per the updated **Safeguards Rule** (effective June 9, 2023), this person (internal or supervised external) conducts scoping, NPI inventory, initial risk assessment, and annual board reporting, establishing governance foundation.

HITRUST CSF vs GLBA

Standards Comparison

HITRUST CSF

Voluntary

2022

Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards

GLBA

Mandatory

1999

U.S. law for financial privacy notices and safeguards

Quick Verdict

HITRUST CSF offers voluntary, certifiable security assurance harmonizing 60+ standards for healthcare and regulated sectors, while GLBA mandates privacy notices and safeguards for U.S. financial institutions handling NPI. Organizations adopt HITRUST for market trust; GLBA to avoid penalties.

Information Security

HITRUST CSF

HITRUST Common Security Framework

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Financial Privacy

GLBA

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Privacy notices and opt-out rights for NPI sharing
Written information security program with safeguards
Qualified Individual designation and board reporting
30-day FTC breach notification for 500+ consumers
Mandatory service provider oversight and risk assessment

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

HITRUST CSF Details

What It Is

HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework harmonizing 60+ standards like HIPAA, NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and GDPR. Its primary purpose is providing unified, risk-tailored security and privacy assurance across regulated industries. Key approach: risk-based scoping and five-level maturity model.

Key Components

Hierarchical structure: 19 assessment domains, 14 categories, 49 objectives, ~156 specifications.
Maturity levels: Policy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed.
Derived from ISO 27001 taxonomy with prescriptive requirements.
Tiered certifications: e1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored, 2-year).

Why Organizations Use It

Consolidates compliance for "assess once, report many" efficiency.
Delivers credible third-party assurance via validated reports.
Reduces TPRM costs; 99.4% certified environments breach-free.
Market differentiator in healthcare, finance; lowers insurance premiums.

Implementation Overview

Phased via MyCSF platform: scoping, gap analysis, remediation, validated assessment.
Involves policies, evidence automation, assessor fieldwork.
Suited for healthcare/regulated sectors, scalable by size/risk.
Requires Authorized External Assessors for certification.

GLBA Details

What It Is

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted in 1999. It establishes baseline protections for consumer financial privacy and data security. Primarily targeting financial institutions, GLBA adopts a risk-based approach through its Privacy Rule and Safeguards Rule, enforced by the FTC for non-banks.

Key Components

**Privacy Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 313)Mandates initial/annual notices and opt-out rights for nonaffiliated third-party sharing of nonpublic personal information (NPI).
**Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314)Requires a written information security program with administrative, technical, and physical safeguards; includes ~9 core elements like risk assessment and Qualified Individual oversight.
**Pretexting protectionsProhibits obtaining NPI under false pretenses. No formal certification; compliance via self-implementation and regulatory audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for broad financial entities (banks, lenders, tax firms, auto dealers).
Mitigates enforcement risks (fines up to $100K/violation), enhances cybersecurity, builds customer trust, and supports vendor oversight amid rising breaches.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: scoping, risk assessment, policy development, technical controls (encryption, MFA), training, testing, and board reporting. Applies to U.S. financial activities; scalable by size, with FTC exams for enforcement.

Key Differences

Aspect	HITRUST CSF	GLBA
Scope	Comprehensive security/privacy controls across 19 domains	Privacy notices, opt-outs, and info security program for NPI
Industry	Healthcare primary, all regulated industries, global	Financial institutions (broad, incl. non-banks), U.S.-focused
Nature	Voluntary certifiable framework with centralized assurance	Mandatory U.S. federal regulation with FTC enforcement
Testing	Maturity scoring, validated assessments by external assessors	Risk assessments, pen tests, vulnerability scans periodically
Penalties	Loss of certification, no legal fines	Civil penalties up to $100K/violation, criminal exposure

Scope

HITRUST CSF

Comprehensive security/privacy controls across 19 domains

GLBA

Privacy notices, opt-outs, and info security program for NPI

Industry

HITRUST CSF

Healthcare primary, all regulated industries, global

GLBA

Financial institutions (broad, incl. non-banks), U.S.-focused

Nature

HITRUST CSF

Voluntary certifiable framework with centralized assurance

GLBA

Mandatory U.S. federal regulation with FTC enforcement

Testing

HITRUST CSF

Maturity scoring, validated assessments by external assessors

GLBA

Risk assessments, pen tests, vulnerability scans periodically

Penalties

HITRUST CSF

Loss of certification, no legal fines

GLBA

Civil penalties up to $100K/violation, criminal exposure

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about HITRUST CSF and GLBA

HITRUST CSF FAQ

GLBA FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization

Master NIS2 implementation with our detailed guide. Learn requirements, risk assessment, supply chain security, and compliance steps for your organization. Star

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

FISMA vs MAS TRM

Discover FISMA vs MAS TRM: Compare U.S. federal cybersecurity law with Singapore's financial tech risk guidelines. Key differences, compliance strategies & implementation for global resilience. Dive in now!

ENERGY STAR vs TISAX

Explore ENERGY STAR vs TISAX: EPA's energy efficiency benchmark meets automotive cybersecurity gold standard. Compare requirements, benefits & strategies for compliance, savings & security. Dive in!

K-PIPA vs AS9120B

Discover K-PIPA vs AS9120B: Korea's strict privacy law meets aerospace distributor QMS. Key differences, compliance strategies, risks & tips for global ops. Master both now!

HITRUST CSF

GLBA

Quick Verdict

HITRUST CSF

GLBA

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

HITRUST CSF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

GLBA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

HITRUST CSF FAQ

What is the primary objective of HITRUST CSF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with HITRUST CSF?

Does HITRUST CSF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for HITRUST CSF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with HITRUST CSF?

An HITRUST CSF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing HITRUST CSF?

GLBA FAQ

What is the primary objective of GLBA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with GLBA?

Does GLBA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for GLBA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with GLBA?

Can GLBA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing GLBA?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

FISMA vs MAS TRM

ENERGY STAR vs TISAX

K-PIPA vs AS9120B