ISO 14064 vs AS9120B
ISO 14064
International standards for GHG quantification, reporting, verification
AS9120B
International standard for aerospace distributors' quality management.
Quick Verdict
ISO 14064 provides GHG accounting and assurance for all organizations worldwide, while AS9120B ensures quality management for aerospace distributors. Companies adopt ISO 14064 for credible emissions reporting and AS9120B for supply chain approval and risk mitigation.
ISO 14064
ISO 14064 Greenhouse gases quantification, reporting, verification standards
Key Features
- Three-part modular structure for inventories, projects, verification
- Five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
- Standardizes Scope 1-3 emissions categorization and boundaries
- Risk-based validation and verification processes (Part 3)
- Aligns with GHG Protocol for global regulatory compliance
AS9120B
AS9120B Quality Management Systems for Distributors
Key Features
- Traceability and chain-of-custody controls for split lots
- Counterfeit and suspected unapproved parts prevention
- Enhanced external provider evaluation and flowdown
- Configuration management via sales order records
- Risk-based operational planning and verification
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 14064 Details
What It Is
ISO 14064 (Parts 1:2018, 2:2019, 3:2019) is an international standard family for quantifying, reporting, and assuring greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions/removals. It offers a principle-based, modular framework for organizations and projects, focusing on credible, auditable inventories via structured boundaries and methodologies.
Key Components
- **Part 1Organizational GHG inventories (Scopes 1-3)
- **Part 2Project reductions/removals with baselines/additionality
- **Part 3Validation/verification with risk assessment
- Five principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
- Third-party assurance model, no formal certification
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables regulatory compliance (CSRD, SB-253, ETS)
- Builds investor trust, unlocks green finance
- Identifies efficiency hotspots, manages Scope 3 risks
- Enhances comparability, combats greenwashing
Implementation Overview
- Phased: governance, boundaries, data collection, verification
- Suits all sizes, GHG-intensive sectors globally
- 6-12 months typical; integrates with ISO 14001
AS9120B Details
What It Is
AS9120B is the IAQG quality management system standard for aerospace distributors, built on ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause structure. It establishes requirements for organizations procuring, storing, splitting, and reselling parts without alteration, using a risk-based approach to address distribution risks like traceability loss and counterfeits.
Key Components
- Over 100 aerospace-specific requirements beyond ISO 9001.
- Core areas: context analysis, leadership, planning, support, operations (traceability, preservation, counterfeit prevention), performance evaluation, improvement.
- Built on PDCA cycle; requires documented information, not a full manual.
- Certification via accredited bodies, leading to IAQG OASIS listing.
Why Organizations Use It
- Commercial necessity for OEM/Tier 1 supply chains.
- Mitigates risks of nonconformities, enhances chain-of-custody trust.
- Drives efficiency, market access (over 2,400 global certifications), competitive edge.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months).
- Applies to aviation/space/defense distributors globally.
- Involves cross-functional teams, internal audits, management reviews for certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 14064 | AS9120B |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification | Aerospace parts distribution quality management |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide, any organization | Aerospace distribution, aviation/space/defense |
| Nature | Voluntary international standard family | Voluntary certification standard for distributors |
| Testing | Third-party validation/verification optional | Certification audits, internal audits required |
| Penalties | Loss of credibility, no legal penalties | Loss of certification, market exclusion |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 14064 and AS9120B
ISO 14064 FAQ
AS9120B FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Overlays Unlock AI Risk Management for Private Sector Enterprises in 2025
Top 5 reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 AI overlays unlock risk management for private enterprises. Tailorable controls combat model poisoning & data leakage. CISO i

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365
Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

DORA Third-Party Risk Management: A Consultant’s Guide to Mapping Critical ICT Service Providers in 2026
Navigate DORA's complex third-party risk pillar. Step-by-step consultant guide to identify critical ICT providers, remediate Article 30 contracts, and build the
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Explore More Comparisons
See how ISO 14064 and AS9120B compare against other standards