ISO 14064
International standards for GHG quantification, reporting, verification
CIS Controls
Prioritized cybersecurity framework of 18 controls
Quick Verdict
ISO 14064 provides GHG accounting and verification standards for climate reporting worldwide, while CIS Controls offer prioritized cybersecurity safeguards for all organizations. Companies adopt ISO 14064 for emissions credibility and regulatory readiness; CIS Controls for breach prevention and compliance efficiency.
ISO 14064
ISO 14064 GHG quantification, reporting, verification standards
Key Features
- Three-part modular framework for inventories, projects, verification
- Five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
- Defines Scope 1-3 boundaries and baseline scenarios
- Risk-based validation and verification processes
- Aligns with GHG Protocol for regulatory compliance
CIS Controls
CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1
Key Features
- 18 prioritized controls with 153 safeguards
- Implementation Groups IG1-IG3 for scalability
- Mappings to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS
- Asset/software inventory automation emphasis
- Free benchmarks and assessment tools
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 14064 Details
What It Is
ISO 14064 (Parts 1:2018, 2:2019, 3:2019) is an international standard family for GHG quantification, reporting, and assurance. This modular framework specifies requirements for organizational inventories, project reductions/removals, and independent verification, guided by **five principlesrelevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy.
Key Components
- **Part 1Organizational inventories with Scope 1-3 boundaries, data quality management.
- **Part 2Project baselines, additionality, monitoring for net benefits.
- **Part 3Risk-based assurance, evidence gathering, competence requirements. Principle-driven with transparent audit trails; compliance via verification statements.
Why Organizations Use It
Enables regulatory readiness (CSRD, SB-253), investor-grade disclosures, carbon market access. Mitigates greenwashing risks, drives decarbonization, builds stakeholder trust through verifiable data.
Implementation Overview
Phased: governance, boundaries, data systems, reporting, verification. Applies to all sizes/industries; 6-12 months typical, integrates with ISO 14001. Requires documentation, training, third-party assurance.
CIS Controls Details
What It Is
CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1 is a community-driven, prescriptive cybersecurity framework of prioritized best practices to reduce attack surfaces and enhance resilience. It applies to hybrid/cloud environments via actionable safeguards.
Key Components
- 18 controls covering asset management to penetration testing.
- 153 safeguards tiered into **Implementation Groups (IG1–IG3)IG1 (56 essentials), IG2/IG3 advanced.
- Built on real-world threats; maps to NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS.
- No formal certification; self-assessed via tools like Controls Navigator.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates 85% common attacks, accelerates compliance.
- Cuts breach costs, enables insurance discounts.
- Builds trust with partners/regulators.
- Delivers efficiency via automation, KPIs.
Implementation Overview
- **Phased roadmapgovernance, gap analysis, IG1 execution (9–18 months typical).
- Inventory assets, deploy MFA/EDR, automate scanning.
- Suits all sizes/industries; voluntary adoption.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 14064 | CIS Controls |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification | Cybersecurity best practices, asset protection, incident response |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide, organizations/projects | All industries globally, IT/security focused |
| Nature | Voluntary international standard family | Voluntary prioritized cybersecurity controls |
| Testing | Third-party validation/verification (ISO 14064-3) | Self-assessment, pen testing, maturity audits |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, loss of credibility | No penalties, increased breach risk |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 14064 and CIS Controls
ISO 14064 FAQ
CIS Controls FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for

Top 10 Reasons ISO 27701 is the Ultimate Privacy Boost for Your ISO 27001 ISMS in 2025
Extend ISO 27001 with ISO 27701 for ultimate privacy governance amid GDPR & AI regs. Discover top 10 advantages like integrated audits to future-proof your ISMS

ISO 27701 Standalone Certification in 2025: Debunking Myths and Navigating the New Reality
Debunk myths on ISO 27701 standalone certification post-2025. Clarify viability, accreditation bodies, ISO 27001 audit differences & procurement benefits. Guide
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
RoHS vs ISO 28000
Explore RoHS vs ISO 28000: EU EEE hazardous substance bans vs supply chain security mgmt. Master compliance, exemptions, testing & strategies for global success. Dive in!
GRI vs GDPR UK
Explore GRI vs GDPR UK: Key differences in sustainability reporting & data protection compliance. Unlock strategies for seamless ESG alignment, risk mitigation & regulatory mastery. (152)
ENERGY STAR vs GMP
Compare ENERGY STAR vs GMP: EPA's efficiency benchmarks slash energy costs 35% while GMP ensures pharma quality control. Optimize compliance, boost savings—discover key differences now!