What is the primary objective of **ISO 14064**?

**ISO 14064 provides requirements and guidance for quantifying, reporting, and verifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and removals.** The standard family—**ISO 14064-1:2018** for organizational inventories, **ISO 14064-2:2019** for project-level reductions/removals, and **ISO 14064-3:2019** for validation/verification—ensures inventories adhere to five principles: **relevance**, **completeness**, **consistency**, **transparency**, and **accuracy**. It enables credible GHG statements for regulatory reporting, investor disclosure, and carbon markets.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 14064**?

**No organization is legally mandated to comply with ISO 14064, as it is a voluntary international standard.** It is professionally required for entities preparing credible GHG inventories, including companies in energy-intensive sectors, project developers (e.g., renewable energy, CCS), governments, NGOs, and verification bodies. Stakeholders such as investors, regulators (e.g., under CSRD or SB-253), and supply chains demand ISO 14064-aligned reporting for comparability and assurance.

Does **ISO 14064** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 14064 does not require external audit or third-party certification.** Parts 1 and 2 specify self-managed quantification and reporting, with **ISO 14064-3** providing optional guidance for validation (forward-looking) or verification (historical) by independent bodies competent under **ISO 14065:2020**. In practice, third-party assurance elevates credibility for markets, finance, and programs like CDP.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 14064** be performed?

**ISO 14064 requires annual GHG inventory assessments for organizational reporting under Part 1.** Reporting periods must be specified (typically calendar or fiscal year), with **consistency** ensuring stable methods and base-year adjustments for structural changes (e.g., acquisitions). Project assessments (Part 2) follow defined monitoring plans, often continuous or periodic, while verification (Part 3) aligns with reporting cycles.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 14064**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 14064 carries no direct penalties, as it is voluntary.** Indirect consequences include rejected GHG claims in carbon markets, failed stakeholder assurance (e.g., investors, regulators), reputational damage from greenwashing accusations, and exclusion from emissions trading or green finance. Poor inventories risk material misstatements during **ISO 14064-3** verification, eroding trust.

Can **ISO 14064** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 14064 maps closely to the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard, sharing identical principles of relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy.** **ISO 14064-1** aligns with organizational Scopes 1-3; **Part 2** supports project baselines/additionality; **Part 3** enables compatible verification. This interoperability supports multi-framework reporting without duplication.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 14064**?

**The first step is defining organizational and operational boundaries per ISO 14064-1.** Select consolidation approach (**equity share** or **control**—financial/operational), identify emission sources/sinks (Scopes 1-3), and document relevance to ensure completeness. This governance decision sets the foundation for data collection, base-year selection, and auditability.

What is the primary objective of **CSA**?

**The primary objective of CSA (Computer Software Assurance) is to provide a risk-based framework for assuring the safety, effectiveness, and compliance of software used in GxP-regulated environments like pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturing.** Introduced by FDA draft guidance in 2022, CSA replaces traditional validation with scalable activities based on software risk (low, medium, high), emphasizing unscripted testing for high-risk functions and scripted testing where predictability is critical. It aligns with 21 CFR Part 11 and Part 820, focusing on data integrity, lifecycle governance, and NIST CSF elements to prevent data breaches and ensure product quality.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **CSA**?

**Pharma, biotech, and medical device manufacturers handling GxP software are professionally required to implement CSA under FDA oversight.** Applies to any entity using regulated software (e.g., LIMS, MES, EBR) impacting patient safety or product quality; no specific employee/revenue thresholds, but FDA inspections target critical systems. Vendors providing SaaS to regulated firms must support CSA-compatible controls via SLAs.

Does **CSA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, CSA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification; it relies on internal risk-based assurance activities documented for FDA inspections.** Organizations perform self-assessments, IQ/OQ/PQ validation, and continuous monitoring; external audits may occur via FDA Form 483 reviews or voluntary third-party GxP verification.

How often should an assessment for **CSA** be performed?

**CSA assessments must be performed at key lifecycle points: initial qualification, post-change, and periodically based on risk (e.g., annually for high-risk software).** FDA guidance specifies re-assessment triggers like patches, upgrades, or incidents; continuous monitoring via SIEM/DSPM tools ensures ongoing compliance without fixed intervals.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **CSA**?

**Non-compliance with CSA risks FDA warning letters, Form 483 observations, fines up to $1M per violation, product seizures, and batch rejections.** Severe cases lead to import alerts, consent decrees, or operational shutdowns; data integrity failures trigger recalls and litigation.

Can **CSA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, CSA maps directly to EU Annex 11, Japan MHLW, and Canada DPDP for computerized systems.** Core alignments include risk-based validation (Annex 11 Clause 4), audit trails (Annex 11 Clause 17), and lifecycle controls; supports global harmonization without separate implementations.

What is the first step to begin implementing **CSA**?

**The first step is conducting a risk-based gap analysis of all regulated software assets against FDA CSA guidance.** Inventory systems (in-house/SaaS), classify by risk tier, map current validation to CSA activities, and produce a prioritized remediation roadmap with executive charter.

ISO 14064 vs CSA

Standards Comparison

ISO 14064

Voluntary

2018

International standards for GHG quantification, reporting, verification

CSA

Voluntary

1919

Canadian consensus standards for occupational health and safety

Quick Verdict

ISO 14064 provides GHG measurement, reporting, and assurance standards for global organizations, while CSA offers OHS management and hazard standards primarily for Canadian workplaces. Companies adopt ISO 14064 for climate credibility and CSA for safety compliance and due diligence.

Greenhouse Gas Accounting

ISO 14064

ISO 14064-1:2018, 14064-2:2019, 14064-3:2019

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
Modular three-part structure for inventories, projects, verification
Organizational boundaries with equity/operational control options
Scopes 1-3 emissions quantification and uncertainty assessment
Risk-based validation/verification with reasonable/limited assurance

Product Safety

CSA

CSA Z1000 Occupational health and safety management

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Consensus-based development with SCC accreditation
PDCA cycle for OHS management systems (Z1000)
Hazard identification and risk assessment (Z1002)
Hierarchy of controls for risk prioritization
Worker participation and continual improvement

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 14064 Details

What It Is

ISO 14064 is an international standard family (ISO 14064-1:2018 for organizational inventories, ISO 14064-2:2019 for projects, ISO 14064-3:2019 for validation/verification) providing specifications and guidance for quantifying, reporting, and assuring greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions/removals. It uses a principle-based approach emphasizing relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy, aligned with GHG Protocol.

Key Components

**Three interdependent partsorganizational GHG inventories (Part 1), project reductions/removals (Part 2), and independent assurance (Part 3).
Core principles guide boundary-setting, data quality, uncertainty management.
Scopes 1-3 classification, baseline scenarios, risk-based evidence gathering.
Voluntary third-party verification with limited/reasonable assurance levels.

Why Organizations Use It

Supports regulatory compliance (e.g., CSRD, SB-253), investor disclosure, carbon markets. Enhances credibility, enables decarbonization tracking, mitigates greenwashing risks, unlocks green finance.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: governance/gap analysis, boundary design, data systems, verification. Applies to all sizes/industries; 6-12 months typical. Involves cross-functional teams, software tools, optional certification via accredited verifiers.

CSA Details

What It Is

CSA standards, developed by CSA Group, are a family of accredited consensus-based National Standards of Canada focused on occupational health and safety (OHS) management, hazard identification, and risk control. Key examples include CSA Z1000 for OHSMS and CSA Z1002 for hazard/risk processes, employing a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) methodology.

Key Components

**PDCA structurepolicy/leadership, planning, implementation/operation, checking, management review.
Hazard categories (biological, chemical, ergonomic, physical, psychosocial, safety).
Hierarchy of controls, worker participation, incident investigation.
No fixed control count; certification via SCC-accredited bodies.

Why Organizations Use It

Demonstrates due diligence, satisfies legal duties when referenced in regulations.
Reduces risks, improves compliance monitoring.
Builds stakeholder trust, supports market access/procurement.
Enables continual improvement and operational efficiency.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, policy development, training, audits, integration.
Applies to all industries/organizations; Canada-centric but globally aligned.
Optional third-party certification with periodic surveillance.

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 14064	CSA
Scope	GHG quantification, reporting, verification (Parts 1-3)	OHS management systems, hazard ID, risk assessment (Z1000/Z1002)
Industry	All sectors worldwide (orgs, projects, governments)	Worker safety across industries, Canada-focused standards
Nature	Voluntary international standards family	Consensus standards, often mandatory via regulation reference
Testing	Third-party validation/verification (ISO 14064-3)	Audits, certification by accredited bodies (SCC-accredited)
Penalties	Loss of credibility, no direct legal penalties	Fines, enforcement when incorporated by reference

Scope

ISO 14064

GHG quantification, reporting, verification (Parts 1-3)

CSA

OHS management systems, hazard ID, risk assessment (Z1000/Z1002)

Industry

ISO 14064

All sectors worldwide (orgs, projects, governments)

CSA

Worker safety across industries, Canada-focused standards

Nature

ISO 14064

Voluntary international standards family

CSA

Consensus standards, often mandatory via regulation reference

Testing

ISO 14064

Third-party validation/verification (ISO 14064-3)

CSA

Audits, certification by accredited bodies (SCC-accredited)

Penalties

ISO 14064

Loss of credibility, no direct legal penalties

CSA

Fines, enforcement when incorporated by reference

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 14064 and CSA

ISO 14064 FAQ

CSA FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Why applying the NIST CSF Standard is a Life-Saver!

Discover why NIST CSF 2.0 is a life-saver for organizations. This flexible framework's 6 functions—Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover—boost res

Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists

Discover 10 common SOC 2 Type 2 audit pitfalls like evidence gaps, scope creep, vendor oversights. Get Fail/Pass visuals, client stories, checklists for 95% fir

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27001 vs PMBOK

Explore ISO 27001 vs PMBOK: ISO 27001 masters info sec risk mgmt; PMBOK excels in project delivery. Align for compliant, resilient ops. Discover synergies now!

SAFe vs IFS Food

Compare SAFe vs IFS Food: Scale enterprise agile with SAFe or master food safety compliance via IFS? Discover key differences, benefits & tips to choose wisely. (152 characters)

COPPA vs GRI

Explore COPPA vs GRI: Child privacy law meets sustainability standards. Key diffs, FTC fines ($170M YouTube), OHS metrics, compliance tips for apps & reports. Act now!

ISO 14064

CSA

Quick Verdict

ISO 14064

Key Features

CSA

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 14064 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

CSA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 14064 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 14064?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 14064?

Does ISO 14064 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 14064 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 14064?

Can ISO 14064 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 14064?

CSA FAQ

What is the primary objective of CSA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with CSA?

Does CSA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for CSA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with CSA?

Can CSA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing CSA?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Why applying the NIST CSF Standard is a Life-Saver!

Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27001 vs PMBOK

SAFe vs IFS Food

COPPA vs GRI