What is the primary objective of **ISO 22000**?

**ISO 22000 enables organizations to provide safe products through a Food Safety Management System (FSMS) that prevents, eliminates, or reduces hazards to acceptable levels.** Published June 19, 2018, it integrates **Codex HACCP principles** with management system requirements using the **High-Level Structure (HLS)** and two nested **PDCA cycles**—one for organizational governance (Clauses 4–7, 9–10) and one for operational hazard controls (Clause 8). Intended outcomes include compliance with statutory/customer requirements, effective communication across the food chain, and a basis for certification.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 22000**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 22000, as it is a voluntary international standard.** It applies professionally to any entity directly or indirectly in the food chain, including primary producers, feed/animal food producers, processors, packaging manufacturers, transport/storage providers, retailers, food services, and related suppliers, regardless of size. Certification demonstrates FSMS assurance to customers, regulators, and markets demanding GFSI-recognized schemes like FSSC 22000.

Does **ISO 22000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 22000 requires internal audits but external audits and third-party certification are voluntary.** Clause 9.2 mandates risk-based internal audits to verify FSMS conformity and effectiveness. Certification by accredited bodies follows ISO/IEC conformity standards via stage 1 (readiness) and stage 2 (implementation) audits, with annual surveillance and triennial recertification.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 22000** be performed?

**Internal assessments for ISO 22000 must be performed at planned intervals, with risk-based frequency for high-risk processes.** Clause 9 requires monitoring, measurement, analysis, and internal audits (9.2) proportionate to risks, plus management reviews (9.3) at defined intervals addressing performance data and changes. External surveillance audits occur annually post-certification, with full recertification every three years.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 22000**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 22000 results in loss of certification, but no direct legal penalties as it is voluntary.** Certification bodies issue nonconformities—minor (correctable within 90 days), major (requiring root cause analysis), or critical (immediate suspension)—leading to failed audits, recertification delays, or scope exclusions. Operationally, weak FSMS risks recalls, regulatory fines under local laws, brand damage, and market exclusion.

Can **ISO 22000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 22000:2018 aligns with other ISO management system standards via its High-Level Structure (HLS).** Clauses 4–10 match ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and ISO 45001, enabling integrated systems, shared audits, and reduced duplication in context, leadership, planning, support, performance evaluation, and improvement.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 22000**?

**The first step is defining the FSMS scope and understanding organizational context per Clause 4.** Identify internal/external issues, interested parties' requirements, and boundaries, followed by a gap analysis against Clauses 4–10 and sector PRPs (e.g., ISO/TS 22002 series) to prioritize actions.

What is the primary objective of **C-TPAT**?

**C-TPAT's primary objective is to secure the international supply chain from terrorism and criminal threats through voluntary public-private partnerships with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).** Launched in November 2001 post-9/11, it requires partners to implement role-specific Minimum Security Criteria (MSC) across 12 domains, including risk assessment, business partner security, conveyance security, and cybersecurity. Over 11,400 partners cover >52% of U.S. import value, enabling risk-based targeting and trade facilitation like reduced examinations.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **C-TPAT**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with C-TPAT as it is a voluntary CBP program.** Eligible partners include U.S. importers, exporters, highway/rail/sea/air carriers, customs brokers, terminal operators, consolidators, 3PLs, and foreign manufacturers, provided they demonstrate MSC adherence and no significant security incidents. CBP evaluates applications individually via the C-TPAT Portal; professionals in U.S. trade often join for benefits like FAST lanes and lower risk scores.

Does **C-TPAT** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**C-TPAT does not require external audits or third-party certification.** CBP conducts risk-based validations through assigned Supply Chain Security Specialists (SCSS), including document reviews, staff interviews, and site visits limited to ~10 working days. Partners must maintain internal validations mirroring CBP processes and submit evidence-rich Security Profiles annually; Tier 2/3 status follows successful validation.

How often should an assessment for **C-TPAT** be performed?

**C-TPAT requires risk assessments at least annually, with more frequent reviews triggered by changes in operations, threats, or incidents.** CBP's Five-Step Risk Assessment—mapping flows, threat/vulnerability analysis, corrective actions—must document domestic/international risks. Security Profiles demand annual updates with new Evidence of Implementation; internal audits are quarterly, with comprehensive annual reviews to prepare for CBP revalidations every 4 years.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **C-TPAT**?

**Non-compliance with C-TPAT can result in suspension or removal of benefits, such as increased examinations and loss of FAST lane access.** Significant validation weaknesses trigger Corrective Action Plans; unremedied issues lead to benefit suspension via CBP's process. No direct fines apply as it's voluntary, but reinstated status requires verified remediation; repeated failures risk program removal.

Can **C-TPAT** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, C-TPAT maps to international frameworks through 19 Mutual Recognition Arrangements (MRAs) with foreign AEO programs.** CBP recognizes equivalent security validations from partners like EU, Canada, Mexico, Japan, and others, reducing duplicate audits. Partners verify foreign AEO status via the Portal; mappings align MSCs to ISO 28000/27001, enabling global equivalence without waiving U.S. requirements like ISF.

What is the first step to begin implementing **C-TPAT**?

**The first step to implement C-TPAT is conducting a CBP-aligned Five-Step Risk Assessment and gap analysis against role-specific MSCs.** Map end-to-end supply chains, identify threats/vulnerabilities, prioritize remediations, and secure executive sponsorship via a signed Statement of Support. Form a cross-functional team, then submit the Company Profile and Security Profile via the C-TPAT Portal for CBP review within 90 days.

ISO 22000 vs C-TPAT

Standards Comparison

ISO 22000

Voluntary

2018

International standard for food safety management systems

C-TPAT

Voluntary

2001

Voluntary U.S. program for supply chain security partnership

Quick Verdict

ISO 22000 ensures food safety via HACCP-integrated management systems for global food chains, while C-TPAT secures trade against terrorism through CBP-validated controls for importers/carriers. Organizations adopt ISO 22000 for certification/market access; C-TPAT for reduced inspections and facilitation.

Food Safety

ISO 22000

ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Adopts High-Level Structure for integrated management systems
Implements two nested PDCA cycles for governance and operations
Integrates HACCP principles with systematic hazard control
Categorizes controls as PRPs, OPRPs, and CCPs rigorously
Mandates interactive communication across food chain

Supply Chain Security

C-TPAT

Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT)

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Risk-based supply chain security partnership
Tailored Minimum Security Criteria by partner type
Reduced CBP inspections and FAST lane access
Annual security profiles and validations
Mutual recognition with foreign AEO programs

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 22000 Details

What It Is

ISO 22000:2018 is an international certification standard for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It applies to any organization in the food chain, providing a systematic framework to ensure safe products through hazard prevention, regulatory compliance, and chain-wide communication. Built on a risk-based approach with two nested PDCA cycles—organizational and operational—it integrates HACCP principles.

Key Components

Core clauses 4-10 following High-Level Structure (HLS).
PRPs, hazard analysis, OPRPs/CCPs, traceability, verification.
Leadership, planning, support, performance evaluation, improvement.
Certification via accredited bodies with staged audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets customer/regulatory demands, enables market access.
Reduces risks of recalls, contamination, brand damage.
Builds trust, supports GFSI schemes like FSSC 22000.
Drives efficiency, integration with ISO 9001/14001.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, PRPs/hazard plans, training, audits.
Scalable for SMEs to multinationals across food sectors.
6-18 months typical; requires internal audits, management reviews.

C-TPAT Details

What It Is

C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) is a voluntary public-private partnership framework administered by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Its primary purpose is to secure international supply chains against terrorism and criminal threats while facilitating legitimate trade. The approach is risk-based, emphasizing Minimum Security Criteria (MSC) tailored to partner types like importers, carriers, and brokers.

Key Components

12 core MSC domains: risk assessment, business partners, cybersecurity, physical access, personnel security, conveyance security, seals, procedural security, agricultural security, training, audits, and incident response.
Over 100 role-specific requirements.
Built on governance, evidence of implementation, and the 2021 Best Practices Framework.
Compliance via annual security profiles, validations, and tiered benefits (Tier 1-3).

Why Organizations Use It

Reduces CBP inspections, enables FAST lanes, and provides priority recovery.
No legal mandate but strategic for trade efficiency and risk mitigation.
Builds stakeholder trust, competitive edge, and mutual recognition via MRAs.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, remediation, training, partner vetting, internal audits.
Applies to importers, carriers, brokers globally; scalable by size.
CBP validations (risk-based, ~10 days); no external certification fee.

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 22000	C-TPAT
Scope	Food safety management systems across food chain	Supply chain security against terrorism threats
Industry	Food, feed, packaging, logistics globally	Importers, exporters, carriers, US-focused trade
Nature	Voluntary ISO certification standard	Voluntary CBP partnership program
Testing	Certification body audits, internal audits	CBP validations, internal self-assessments
Penalties	Loss of certification, no legal fines	Benefit suspension, no direct fines

Scope

ISO 22000

Food safety management systems across food chain

C-TPAT

Supply chain security against terrorism threats

Industry

ISO 22000

Food, feed, packaging, logistics globally

C-TPAT

Importers, exporters, carriers, US-focused trade

Nature

ISO 22000

Voluntary ISO certification standard

C-TPAT

Voluntary CBP partnership program

Testing

ISO 22000

Certification body audits, internal audits

C-TPAT

CBP validations, internal self-assessments

Penalties

ISO 22000

Loss of certification, no legal fines

C-TPAT

Benefit suspension, no direct fines

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 22000 and C-TPAT

ISO 22000 FAQ

C-TPAT FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 Private Sector Tailoring Blueprint: First 5 Steps to Overlay-Driven Compliance with Infographic

Step-by-step blueprint for private sector NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 tailoring using overlays for AI & supply chain risks. Infographic + first 5 steps for ROI-drive

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses

Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T

Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles

Transform NIST CSF 2.0 into quantifiable success: Define board-ready KPIs for Functions, build Profile dashboards, track Tier progression. Prove ROI amid cyber

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

IATF 16949 vs ISO 27017

Compare IATF 16949 vs ISO 27017: Automotive QMS (ISO 9001-based) vs cloud security (ISO 27001 extension). Uncover key clauses, differences & compliance benefits. Dive in!

ISO 55001 vs Australian Privacy Act

Discover ISO 55001 vs Australian Privacy Act: Compare asset governance with privacy rules for seamless compliance. Align standards to cut risks, boost data security & ensure regulatory wins. Dive in!

ISO 17025 vs CMMI

Discover ISO 17025 vs CMMI: Lab competence for valid results vs process maturity for IT excellence. Compare structures, benefits & pitfalls. Boost compliance now!

ISO 22000

C-TPAT

Quick Verdict

ISO 22000

Key Features

C-TPAT

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 22000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

C-TPAT Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 22000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 22000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 22000?

Does ISO 22000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 22000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 22000?

Can ISO 22000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 22000?

C-TPAT FAQ

What is the primary objective of C-TPAT?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with C-TPAT?

Does C-TPAT require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for C-TPAT be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with C-TPAT?

Can C-TPAT be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing C-TPAT?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 Private Sector Tailoring Blueprint: First 5 Steps to Overlay-Driven Compliance with Infographic

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses

Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

IATF 16949 vs ISO 27017

ISO 55001 vs Australian Privacy Act

ISO 17025 vs CMMI