Standards Comparison

    ISO 22000

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standard for food safety management systems

    VS

    ISO 17025

    Voluntary
    2017

    International standard for testing and calibration laboratory competence.

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 22000 provides food safety management for food chain organizations, while ISO 17025 ensures testing lab competence. Companies adopt ISO 22000 for supply chain trust and GFSI access; ISO 17025 for credible, internationally accepted results.

    Food Safety

    ISO 22000

    ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Adopts High-Level Structure for integrated management systems
    • Two nested PDCA cycles for strategic and operational control
    • Integrates HACCP principles with full management discipline
    • Categorizes controls as PRPs, OPRPs, and CCPs systematically
    • Emphasizes interactive communication across food chain
    Laboratory Quality

    ISO 17025

    ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for laboratory competence

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates impartiality and confidentiality safeguards
    • Requires metrological traceability to SI units
    • Demands measurement uncertainty evaluation
    • Enforces personnel competence lifecycle management
    • Integrates risk-based thinking and proficiency testing

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 22000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems — Requirements is an international certification standard for establishing, implementing, and improving Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It applies to any organization in the food chain, using a risk-based approach integrating HACCP principles with management system discipline via High-Level Structure (HLS) and dual PDCA cycles.

    Key Components

    • **Clauses 4-10Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
    • Core elements: PRPs, hazard analysis, OPRPs/CCPs, traceability, communication.
    • Built on Codex HACCP, emphasizing validated controls and verification.
    • Certifiable via accredited bodies with staged audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets regulatory/customer requirements, reduces recalls/risks.
    • Enables market access, GFSI schemes like FSSC 22000.
    • Builds trust, integrates with ISO 9001/14001.
    • Drives efficiency, continual improvement.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, PRPs/hazard plan, training, audits.
    • Scalable for SMEs to multinationals in food sectors globally.
    • Requires 3-month operation pre-certification; annual surveillance.

    ISO 17025 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 17025:2017, titled "General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories," is an international accreditation standard. It ensures laboratories deliver technically valid, impartial, and consistent results through a risk-based, performance-oriented approach integrating management and technical controls.

    Key Components

    • Eight clauses: general (impartiality/confidentiality), structural, resource, process, and management system requirements.
    • Focuses on personnel competence, facilities/equipment, metrological traceability, method validation/verification, measurement uncertainty, proficiency testing.
    • Principles: objectivity, competence, continual improvement, risk thinking.
    • Achieved via accreditation by ILAC-signatory bodies assessing scope-specific competence.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets customer/regulatory demands for credible results in safety-critical domains.
    • Enables global acceptance through ILAC mutual recognition.
    • Mitigates risks of invalid data affecting compliance, liability.
    • Boosts market access, efficiency, reputation.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, validation, internal audits, external assessment.
    • Suits labs across industries/sizes; requires witnessed testing for accreditation.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 22000
    Food safety management systems across food chain
    ISO 17025
    Competence of testing/calibration laboratories

    Industry

    ISO 22000
    Food chain: production, processing, retail, logistics
    ISO 17025
    Testing labs: food, environmental, materials, calibration

    Nature

    ISO 22000
    Voluntary FSMS certification standard
    ISO 17025
    Laboratory competence accreditation standard

    Testing

    ISO 22000
    Internal audits, hazard verification, management review
    ISO 17025
    Proficiency testing, method validation, witnessed assessments

    Penalties

    ISO 22000
    Loss of certification, market access denial
    ISO 17025
    Loss of accreditation, results rejection

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 22000 and ISO 17025

    ISO 22000 FAQ

    ISO 17025 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages