Standards Comparison

    WCAG

    Voluntary
    2023

    Global standard for web content accessibility

    VS

    GRI

    Voluntary
    2021

    Global standards for impact-based sustainability reporting

    Quick Verdict

    WCAG ensures web accessibility for disabled users via testable criteria, while GRI mandates sustainability impact disclosures through materiality assessments. Companies adopt WCAG for legal compliance and inclusivity; GRI for stakeholder accountability and ESG transparency.

    Web Accessibility

    WCAG

    Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • POUR principles organize comprehensive accessibility requirements
    • Testable success criteria with A/AA/AAA levels
    • Technology-agnostic across all web platforms
    • Backward-compatible additive version updates
    • Normative criteria separate from informative techniques
    Sustainability Reporting

    GRI

    Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Impact-based materiality assessment process
    • Modular Universal, Sector, Topic Standards
    • Mandatory GRI Content Index for traceability
    • Value chain and supply chain disclosures
    • Interoperability with SASB and regulatory frameworks

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    WCAG Details

    What It Is

    Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) is the W3C's internationally recognized recommendation for accessible web content. This technology-agnostic framework addresses needs of people with disabilities via testable success criteria under POUR principles (Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust), covering websites, apps, and documents.

    Key Components

    • POUR principles with 13 guidelines and ~80 success criteria at A/AA/AAA levels.
    • Normative requirements (success criteria) separated from informative techniques.
    • Conformance requires full pages, complete processes, accessibility-supported tech, non-interference.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Aligns with regulations (ADA, Section 508, EN 301 549, EAA).
    • Mitigates litigation risks amid surging lawsuits.
    • Boosts UX, SEO, conversions, market reach.
    • Secures procurement, builds trust.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: governance/policy, assessment, remediation via design systems/CI tools, training, audits. Applies universally; uses VPAT/ACR for claims, continuous testing.

    GRI Details

    What It Is

    Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards are a modular framework for sustainability reporting. They provide a global common language for organizations to disclose significant economic, environmental, and social impacts. The primary scope covers impacts on economy, environment, and people via an impact-centric materiality approach, prioritizing actual and potential effects over financial materiality alone.

    Key Components

    • Universal Standards (GRI 1: Foundation, GRI 2: General Disclosures, GRI 3: Material Topics) for baseline requirements.
    • Sector Standards for high-impact industries (e.g., Oil & Gas, Mining).
    • Topic Standards (e.g., GRI 403: Occupational Health and Safety) with specific disclosures and metrics. Built on principles like accuracy, balance, verifiability; compliance via "in accordance" claims with GRI Content Index for traceability. No certification, but assurance recommended.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Aligns with regulations (e.g., EU CSRD) and investor needs (SASB interoperability).
    • Enhances risk management, benchmarking, and stakeholder trust.
    • Drives governance of impacts, supply chain due diligence, and decision-useful data.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: materiality assessment (GRI 3), data architecture, management disclosures, Content Index. Applies to all sizes/industries/geographies; involves cross-functional teams, ESG platforms, optional external assurance.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    WCAG
    Web content accessibility for disabilities
    GRI
    Sustainability impacts on economy, environment, people

    Industry

    WCAG
    All web-publishing organizations globally
    GRI
    All sectors worldwide, sector-specific standards

    Nature

    WCAG
    Voluntary W3C technical guidelines
    GRI
    Voluntary modular reporting standards

    Testing

    WCAG
    Automated/manual/AT testing, audits
    GRI
    Materiality assessment, data verification, assurance

    Penalties

    WCAG
    Litigation risk, procurement exclusion
    GRI
    Reputational damage, regulatory non-compliance

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about WCAG and GRI

    WCAG FAQ

    GRI FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages