ISO 22000
International standard for food safety management systems
ISO 27701
International standard for privacy information management systems
Quick Verdict
ISO 22000 ensures food safety via FSMS and HACCP for food chain firms, while ISO 27701 establishes PIMS for privacy governance handling PII. Companies adopt them for certification, supply chain trust, regulatory alignment, and risk reduction.
ISO 22000
ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems
Key Features
- Adopts High-Level Structure for integrated management systems
- Dual PDCA cycles for organizational and operational control
- Integrates HACCP principles with prerequisite programs
- Categorizes controls as PRPs, OPRPs, and CCPs systematically
- Prescriptive interactive communication as hazard control measure
ISO 27701
ISO/IEC 27701:2025 Privacy Information Management
Key Features
- Establishes Privacy Information Management System (PIMS)
- Controller-specific controls in Annex A for DSRs and consent
- Processor-specific controls in Annex B for contracts
- Risk-based assessments and DPIAs for high-risk processing
- Mappings to GDPR and ISO 27001 for integration
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 22000 Details
What It Is
ISO 22000:2018 is an international certification standard for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It applies to any organization in the food chain, providing a framework to ensure safe food through hazard prevention. It uses a risk-based approach with two nested PDCA cycles—organizational and operational (HACCP-aligned).
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 follow High-Level Structure (HLS) for integration.
- Core elements: PRPs, hazard analysis, CCPs/OPRPs, traceability, verification.
- Built on Codex HACCP principles and management system discipline.
- Requires certification via accredited bodies with staged audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets customer/regulatory demands, enables market access.
- Reduces risks of recalls, contamination, legal issues.
- Builds trust, supports GFSI schemes like FSSC 22000.
- Drives efficiency, continual improvement, supply chain resilience.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, PRPs, hazard control plan, training, audits.
- Scalable for SMEs to large firms across food sectors globally.
- Involves leadership commitment, cross-functional teams, 6-18 months typically.
ISO 27701 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27701:2025 is the international standard defining requirements for a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS). It governs PII lifecycle for controllers and processors, emphasizing accountability, risk management, and alignment with laws like GDPR. Adopts a risk-based PDCA methodology integrated with ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–10: Management system extensions for context, leadership, planning, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- **Annex A Controls for PII controllers (consent, DSRs, DPIAs, transfers).
- **Annex BControls for PII processors (contracts, sub-processors, assistance).
- Mappings to GDPR, ISO 27002. Certification via 3-year cycle with audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets global privacy laws, reduces fines/reputational risks.
- Builds trust, aids procurement, harmonizes compliance.
- Enables efficiency via PII inventories, metrics, continual improvement.
Implementation Overview
Phased PDCA: Discover/scope, design/plan, implement/operate, validate/improve. Involves gap analysis, training, vendor management. Applies to all sizes/sectors handling PII; certification optional but recommended.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 22000 | ISO 27701 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Food safety management systems (FSMS) with HACCP | Privacy information management systems (PIMS) for PII |
| Industry | Food chain organizations worldwide, all sizes | Any PII-processing sectors globally, all sizes |
| Nature | Voluntary certifiable management system standard | Voluntary certifiable management system standard |
| Testing | Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits | Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, market access denial | Loss of certification, regulatory non-compliance risk |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 22000 and ISO 27701
ISO 22000 FAQ
ISO 27701 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates
Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt

Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance
Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights
Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 37001 vs J-SOX
ISO 37001 vs J-SOX: Compare anti-bribery management systems with Japan's ICFR standards. Uncover key differences in risk mitigation, compliance benefits & implementation for global firms. Boost governance now.
TOGAF vs ISO 50001
Compare TOGAF vs ISO 50001: EA framework for business-IT alignment meets energy management standard for efficiency gains. Uncover differences, integration tips, and choose the best for your governance needs now!
CMMC vs NIST 800-171
Discover CMMC vs NIST 800-171: DoD's tiered certification verifies NIST controls for CUI protection. Key differences, levels, assessments & strategies to secure contracts. Comply now!