GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/ISO 22301 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Standards Comparison

    ISO 22301 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    ISO 22301

    Voluntary
    2019

    International standard for business continuity management systems

    VS

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Mandatory
    N/A

    China's mandatory framework for graded network protection

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 22301 provides global voluntary BCMS certification for resilience across industries, while MLPS 2.0 mandates graded cybersecurity for China networks with PSB enforcement. Companies adopt ISO for trust and recovery; MLPS for legal compliance.

    Business Continuity

    ISO 22301

    ISO 22301:2019 Business Continuity Management Systems Requirements

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    0-6 months

    Key Features

    • PDCA cycle for continual BCMS improvement
    • Business Impact Analysis and risk assessment core
    • Annex SL alignment for ISO standards integration
    • Leadership commitment with policy and roles
    • Mandatory operational testing and exercises
    Standard

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Five-level impact-based system classification
    • Mandatory PSB registration for Level 2+ systems
    • Scaling technical controls for cloud and IoT
    • Third-party audits with 70/100 passing score
    • Ongoing re-evaluations and law enforcement oversight

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 22301 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 22301:2019 is an international certification standard for Business Continuity Management Systems (BCMS). It provides requirements to protect against, reduce likelihood of, and recover from disruptions, using a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach across 10 clauses.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning (including BIA and risk assessment), support, operations, evaluation, and improvement.
    • No prescriptive controls; flexible, high-level structure via Annex SL.
    • Built on PDCA for continual enhancement.
    • Three-year certification with annual surveillance audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enhances resilience, minimizes downtime and losses.
    • Meets regulations like NIS Directive; integrates with ISO 27001.
    • Builds stakeholder trust, reduces insurance costs, competitive edges.
    • Addresses cyber, natural disasters, supply chain risks.

    Implementation Overview

    • Gap analysis, BIA, training, testing, audits.
    • 60 days to 6 months typical; suits all sizes/sectors.
    • Two-stage certification process.

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

    What It Is

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's legally enforceable cybersecurity regulation under the 2016 Cybersecurity Law. It mandates classification of information systems into five protection levels based on potential harm to national security, social order, and public interests, requiring commensurate technical and organizational controls.

    Key Components

    • Core domains: physical security, network protection, data security, operations monitoring, governance.
    • Standards like GB/T 22239-2019, GB/T 25070-2019 define controls scaling by level.
    • Common baselines plus extensions for cloud, IoT, ICS, big data.
    • Compliance via classification, third-party audits (70/100 score), PSB approval.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for all China network operators; non-compliance risks fines, suspensions.
    • Enhances resilience, aligns with data laws (DSL, PIPL).
    • Builds regulator trust, supports market access.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: scoping, impact classification, gap remediation, external audits, ongoing re-evaluations.
    • Targets enterprises in China; intensive for Level 3+ systems across industries.

    Key Differences

    AspectISO 22301MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    ScopeBusiness continuity management systemsGraded cybersecurity for networks and systems
    IndustryAll sectors worldwide, all sizesAll network operators in China
    NatureVoluntary international certification standardMandatory legal regime enforced by PSBs
    TestingInternal audits, exercises, 3-year certificationThird-party audits, PSB approval, annual re-evals
    PenaltiesLoss of certification, no legal finesFines, operational suspension, inspections

    Scope

    ISO 22301
    Business continuity management systems
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Graded cybersecurity for networks and systems

    Industry

    ISO 22301
    All sectors worldwide, all sizes
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    All network operators in China

    Nature

    ISO 22301
    Voluntary international certification standard
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Mandatory legal regime enforced by PSBs

    Testing

    ISO 22301
    Internal audits, exercises, 3-year certification
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Third-party audits, PSB approval, annual re-evals

    Penalties

    ISO 22301
    Loss of certification, no legal fines
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Fines, operational suspension, inspections

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 22301 and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    ISO 22301 FAQ

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Cyber Essentials on a Shoestring: Filling the Microsoft 365 Security Gaps with Free and Low-Cost Tools

    Cyber Essentials on a Shoestring: Filling the Microsoft 365 Security Gaps with Free and Low-Cost Tools

    Close Cyber Essentials 2026 gaps in basic Microsoft 365 plans using free and low-cost tools. Achieve MFA, patching, and audit readiness without enterprise spend

    CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

    CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

    Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

    The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)

    The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)

    Fail CIS Controls v8.1 audits due to missing evidence? Get the blueprint: exact artifacts auditors want, repository structure, and automation from security tool

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how ISO 22301 and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) compare against other standards

    Other ISO 22301 Comparisons

    • ISO 22301 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 22301
    • ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 22301
    • U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules vs ISO 22301
    • RoHS vs ISO 22301

    Other MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Comparisons

    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • ISO 31000 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • HIPAA vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 28000
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 30301
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved