GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/ISO 27017 vs AS9110C
    Standards Comparison

    ISO 27017 vs AS9110C

    ISO 27017

    Voluntary
    2015

    International code for cloud security controls guidance

    VS

    AS9110C

    Mandatory
    2016

    Aerospace QMS standard for aircraft MRO organizations.

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 27017 provides cloud-specific security guidance extending ISO 27001 for CSPs and customers worldwide, while AS9110C mandates comprehensive QMS for aerospace MROs ensuring airworthiness and regulatory compliance. Organizations adopt them for specialized risk management and market credibility.

    Cloud Security

    ISO 27017

    ISO/IEC 27017:2015 Code of practice for cloud security

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Introduces 7 cloud-specific CLD controls
    • Clarifies shared responsibilities for CSPs and CSCs
    • Provides guidance on 37 ISO 27002 cloud controls
    • Addresses multi-tenancy and VM segregation
    • Enables customer monitoring of cloud activities
    Quality Management

    AS9110C

    AS9110C Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based thinking embedded in planning and operations
    • Configuration management for traceability and changes
    • Counterfeit parts prevention and detection controls
    • Human factors in competence and root cause analysis
    • Maintenance release and project management requirements

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 27017 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 27017:2015 is a code of practice extending ISO/IEC 27002 with cloud-specific information security controls. It provides implementation guidance for 37 existing controls and adds 7 new CLD controls, focusing on cloud environments like IaaS, PaaS, SaaS across public, private, hybrid deployments. Its risk-based approach integrates into ISO 27001 ISMS.

    Key Components

    • Mirrors ISO 27002 structure (clauses 5-18)
    • **7 CLD controlsshared responsibilities, VM segregation/hardening, admin ops, monitoring, asset removal
    • Built on ISO 27001 for certification
    • Dual guidance for CSPs and CSCs

    Why Organizations Use It

    Enhances cloud risk management, clarifies shared responsibilities, supports GDPR/CCPA alignment. Builds trust with customers/regulators, differentiates CSPs in procurement, reduces incidents via multi-tenancy controls.

    Implementation Overview

    Integrate into existing ISO 27001 ISMS via risk assessment, control mapping, tooling for monitoring/segregation. Applies to CSPs/CSCs of all sizes; audited as ISO 27001 extension (9-12 months joint). Requires cloud maturity, documentation updates.

    AS9110C Details

    What It Is

    AS9110C is the international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) organizations. It extends ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements, focusing on safety-critical processes using a risk-based thinking (RBT) and PDCA approach.

    Key Components

    • Core clauses (4-10) covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
    • Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, maintenance release, supplier controls.
    • Built on ISO High Level Structure (HLS); requires documented information, not rigid procedures.
    • Certification via accredited registrars with internal audits and management reviews.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignments (FAA/EASA Part-145).
    • Mitigates safety risks, ensures airworthiness traceability.
    • Drives efficiency, on-time delivery, market access via OASIS listing.
    • Builds stakeholder trust in MRO competence.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, pilots, audits, certification.
    • Applies to MROs of all sizes globally; 6-12 months typical.
    • Involves leadership commitment, eQMS tools, IAQG auditor training.

    Key Differences

    AspectISO 27017AS9110C
    ScopeCloud-specific information security controlsAerospace MRO quality management system
    IndustryCloud services providers and customers globallyAviation maintenance, repair, overhaul organizations
    NatureGuidance code of practice, ISO 27001 extensionCertifiable QMS standard based on ISO 9001
    TestingAssessed within ISO 27001 audits, no standalone certFull certification audits, surveillance, recertification
    PenaltiesLoss of ISO 27001 certification, market disadvantageRegulatory sanctions, contract loss, safety risks

    Scope

    ISO 27017
    Cloud-specific information security controls
    AS9110C
    Aerospace MRO quality management system

    Industry

    ISO 27017
    Cloud services providers and customers globally
    AS9110C
    Aviation maintenance, repair, overhaul organizations

    Nature

    ISO 27017
    Guidance code of practice, ISO 27001 extension
    AS9110C
    Certifiable QMS standard based on ISO 9001

    Testing

    ISO 27017
    Assessed within ISO 27001 audits, no standalone cert
    AS9110C
    Full certification audits, surveillance, recertification

    Penalties

    ISO 27017
    Loss of ISO 27001 certification, market disadvantage
    AS9110C
    Regulatory sanctions, contract loss, safety risks

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 27017 and AS9110C

    ISO 27017 FAQ

    AS9110C FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts

    Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts

    Advanced compliance tools use AI, analytics & real-time monitoring to predict regulatory shifts, cut non-compliance costs 3x, and ensure audit readiness. Stay p

    CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)

    CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)

    Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.

    The DORA 'Hot Seat' Blueprint: Preparing Leadership and the Management Body for Regulatory Interviews

    The DORA 'Hot Seat' Blueprint: Preparing Leadership and the Management Body for Regulatory Interviews

    Prepare your Board & Management Body for DORA audits. Master the human element: demonstrate active oversight & accountability in regulatory interviews. Get the

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how ISO 27017 and AS9110C compare against other standards

    Other ISO 27017 Comparisons

    • ISO 55001 vs ISO 27017
    • CAA vs ISO 27017
    • REACH vs ISO 27017
    • BREEAM vs ISO 27017
    • WELL vs ISO 27017

    Other AS9110C Comparisons

    • CAA vs AS9110C
    • EPA vs AS9110C
    • PIPL vs AS9110C
    • GMP vs AS9110C
    • REACH vs AS9110C
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved