GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/ISO 27017 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Standards Comparison

    ISO 27017 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    ISO 27017

    Voluntary
    2015

    International code for cloud-specific security controls

    VS

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Mandatory
    N/A

    China's mandatory graded cybersecurity protection scheme

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 27017 provides voluntary cloud security guidance integrated into global ISMS for CSPs worldwide, while MLPS 2.0 mandates graded protections for all Chinese networks with PSB enforcement. Companies adopt ISO for trust, MLPS for legal compliance.

    Cloud Security

    ISO 27017

    ISO/IEC 27017:2015 Code of practice for cloud security

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Clarifies shared responsibilities between CSPs and CSCs
    • Introduces seven cloud-specific security controls
    • Ensures multi-tenant segregation and VM hardening
    • Mandates secure asset removal and data lifecycle management
    • Enables customer monitoring of cloud service activities
    Standard

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Five impact-based protection levels for systems
    • Mandatory classification and PSB registration Level 2+
    • Technical controls for cloud, IoT, big data
    • Governance, personnel, third-party management requirements
    • Third-party audits scoring 70/100 minimum

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 27017 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 27017:2015 is a code of practice providing cloud-specific guidance for information security controls based on ISO/IEC 27002. It extends ISO 27001 ISMS for cloud environments, addressing shared responsibilities in IaaS, PaaS, SaaS across public, private, hybrid deployments. Its risk-based approach adapts controls to unique cloud risks like multi-tenancy and virtualization.

    Key Components

    • Additional implementation guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls in cloud contexts.
    • Seven new CLD controls: shared roles, VM segregation/hardening, admin operations, customer monitoring, asset removal.
    • Built on ISO 27001; integrated into ISMS audits, no standalone certification.
    • Dual perspectives for CSPs and CSCs.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Resolves shared responsibility ambiguities, preventing security gaps.
    • Supports regulatory compliance (GDPR, CCPA) and procurement demands.
    • Enhances risk management for cloud incidents.
    • Provides competitive differentiation and customer trust.
    • Boosts reputation via auditable cloud security posture.

    Implementation Overview

    • Integrate via ISO 27001 risk assessment, control mapping, SoA updates.
    • Implement configurations, policies, training; audit as 27001 extension.
    • Applies to CSPs/CSCs of all sizes globally.
    • Joint audits (9-12 months) with 27001 reduce costs.

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

    What It Is

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's legally mandated regulatory framework for cybersecurity, operationalizing Article 21 of the 2016 Cybersecurity Law. It requires network operators to classify systems into five protection levels based on potential harm to national security, social order, and public interests, applying graded technical, governance, and physical controls.

    Key Components

    • Domains: physical security, network protection, access control, data security, monitoring, governance.
    • Standards: GB/T 22239-2019 (baseline), GB/T 25070-2019 (technical), GB/T 28448-2019 (evaluation).
    • Compliance: self-classification, third-party audits (Level 2+), PSB approval, periodic re-evaluations.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Avoids fines, license suspensions, inspections.
    • Strengthens resilience against cyber threats.
    • Essential for China market access, operations.
    • Builds regulator trust, competitive edge.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: inventory, classify, gap analysis, remediate, audit, monitor.
    • Targets all China-based network operators; intensive for multinationals.
    • Mandatory audits, filings for Level 2+ systems.

    Key Differences

    AspectISO 27017MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    ScopeCloud-specific security controls for ISMSGraded protection for all networks/systems
    IndustryAll industries, global CSPs/customersAll sectors in China, mandatory for operators
    NatureVoluntary guidance, ISO 27001 extensionMandatory regulation, enforced by PSBs
    TestingISO 27001 audits include 27017 controlsThird-party evaluations, PSB approval Level 2+
    PenaltiesLoss of certification, no legal finesFines, suspensions, operational shutdowns

    Scope

    ISO 27017
    Cloud-specific security controls for ISMS
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Graded protection for all networks/systems

    Industry

    ISO 27017
    All industries, global CSPs/customers
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    All sectors in China, mandatory for operators

    Nature

    ISO 27017
    Voluntary guidance, ISO 27001 extension
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Mandatory regulation, enforced by PSBs

    Testing

    ISO 27017
    ISO 27001 audits include 27017 controls
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Third-party evaluations, PSB approval Level 2+

    Penalties

    ISO 27017
    Loss of certification, no legal fines
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Fines, suspensions, operational shutdowns

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 27017 and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    ISO 27017 FAQ

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Beyond the Checkbox: Why Maturity Assessments are the Secret to Sustainable Compliance

    Beyond the Checkbox: Why Maturity Assessments are the Secret to Sustainable Compliance

    Discover why maturity assessments beat binary compliance checks by uncovering hidden gaps and enabling continuous improvement for sustainable success. Read now!

    The NIS2 "FTE Trap": Why 5 Analysts for 24/7 Security is Actually 8 (and Why the Board Needs to Know)

    The NIS2 "FTE Trap": Why 5 Analysts for 24/7 Security is Actually 8 (and Why the Board Needs to Know)

    Exposed: NIS2 FTE Trap math shows 5 analysts fail 24/7 coverage due to sickness, training, leave & 2026 churn. Line-by-line breakdown for compliance. Alert your

    The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations

    The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations

    Uncover the black box AI risk in security ops. Learn why human-in-the-loop auditing is crucial for 2026. Upskill analysts to ensure data privacy and robust secu

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how ISO 27017 and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) compare against other standards

    Other ISO 27017 Comparisons

    • ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 27017
    • ISO 27017 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 27017
    • EPA vs ISO 27017
    • ISO 9001 vs ISO 27017

    Other MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Comparisons

    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • ISO 31000 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • HIPAA vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 28000
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 30301
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved