ISO 27032
International guidelines for Internet cybersecurity and collaboration
WELL
Certification standard for occupant health in buildings
Quick Verdict
ISO 27032 provides cybersecurity guidelines for internet risks and stakeholder collaboration, while WELL certifies buildings for occupant health via air, light, and wellness metrics. Companies adopt ISO 27032 for digital resilience; WELL for productivity, retention, and ESG advantages.
ISO 27032
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security
Key Features
- Multi-stakeholder collaboration for cyberspace security
- Guidelines bridging info, network, internet security
- Annex A mapping to ISO 27002 controls
- Risk assessment for Internet-facing threats
- Non-certifiable complement to ISO 27001 ISMS
WELL
WELL Building Standard v2
Key Features
- 10 concepts covering air, water, light to community
- Mandatory preconditions and point-based optimizations
- On-site performance verification testing required
- Certification tiers from Bronze to Platinum
- Continuous monitoring for ongoing compliance
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 27032 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27032:2023, titled Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security, is an international guidance standard (non-certifiable) focused on enhancing cybersecurity in interconnected digital ecosystems. It connects information security, network security, Internet security, and CIIP, using a risk-based, collaborative approach emphasizing multi-stakeholder roles.
Key Components
- Thematic domains like risk assessment, incident management, stakeholder collaboration.
- Annex A maps Internet threats to ISO/IEC 27002 controls.
- Built on PDCA cycle; no fixed controls, but layered preventive/detective/response practices.
- Compliance via integration into ISO 27001 ISMS.
Why Organizations Use It
Reduces ecosystem risks, shortens incident dwell time, boosts resilience. Aligns with NIS2/GDPR for regulatory due diligence; enhances trust, market access, insurance benefits. Strategic edge in cloud/supply chains.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping, gap analysis, controls deployment, monitoring. Targets all sizes with online presence; suits critical sectors. No certification, but audits via existing frameworks; 6-12 months typical.
WELL Details
What It Is
The WELL Building Standard (WELL v2) is a performance-based certification framework administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI). It focuses on designing, operating, and verifying buildings to advance human health and well-being through evidence-based strategies. Its concept-based approach emphasizes measurable indoor environmental quality and occupant outcomes via preconditions and optimizations.
Key Components
- **10 core conceptsAir, Water, Nourishment, Light, Movement, Thermal Comfort, Sound, Materials, Mind, Community (plus Innovation).
- 24 Preconditions (mandatory pass/fail) and 102 Optimizations (point-earning).
- Built on public health research; certification via Bronze (40 points) to Platinum (80 points) with concept minimums.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives productivity, retention, higher rents (up to 7.7%), ESG reporting.
- Mitigates health risks, enhances reputation.
- Complements LEED for holistic sustainability.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, scorecard, documentation, on-site verification, recertification (3 years).
- Applies to new/existing buildings, all sizes/industries; requires third-party testing.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 27032 | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Internet security, cyberspace risks, stakeholder collaboration | Building health, indoor environmental quality, occupant well-being |
| Industry | All sectors with online presence, critical infrastructure globally | Real estate, offices, healthcare, education, hospitality worldwide |
| Nature | Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable, complements ISO 27001 | Voluntary performance certification with third-party verification |
| Testing | Gap analysis, risk assessments, no mandatory external testing | On-site performance verification, air/water/light testing required |
| Penalties | No direct penalties, increased breach risks and reputational damage | No legal penalties, loss of certification and market differentiation |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 27032 and WELL
ISO 27032 FAQ
WELL FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance
PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates
Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt
The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations
Uncover the black box AI risk in security ops. Learn why human-in-the-loop auditing is crucial for 2026. Upskill analysts to ensure data privacy and robust secu
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
LGPD vs ISO 27032
Compare LGPD vs ISO 27032: Brazil's GDPR-like privacy law vs global internet cybersecurity guidelines. Key differences in scope, principles & compliance. Align strategies now!
FISMA vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Compare FISMA vs U.S. SEC cybersecurity rules: Key compliance diffs, risk mgmt, reporting for feds vs public cos. Boost resilience—read now! (140 chars)
AEO vs SQF
Compare AEO vs SQF: Customs facilitation powerhouse vs GFSI food safety gold standard. Discover compliance gaps, ROI benefits & strategies to boost secure supply chains now.