GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/ISO 37001 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Standards Comparison

    ISO 37001 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    ISO 37001

    Voluntary
    2025

    International standard for anti-bribery management systems

    VS

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Mandatory
    2019

    China's regulation for graded cybersecurity protection of networks

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 37001 offers voluntary global anti-bribery certification for risk mitigation and trust, while MLPS 2.0 mandates China's graded cybersecurity for all networks, enforced by PSBs. Companies adopt ISO for ethics leadership; MLPS to avoid fines and operate legally.

    Anti-Bribery/Compliance

    ISO 37001

    ISO 37001 Anti-Bribery Management Systems

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based anti-bribery management system framework
    • Third-party due diligence and monitoring requirements
    • Leadership commitment with dedicated compliance function
    • PDCA cycle for continual improvement and audits
    • Financial and non-financial controls proportionality
    Cybersecurity

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0 (MLPS 2.0)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Five-level impact-based system classification
    • Mandatory PSB registration and audits for Level 2+
    • Technical controls for cloud, IoT, big data
    • Governance and personnel security requirements
    • Law enforcement oversight and periodic re-evaluations

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 37001 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 37001:2016 Anti-Bribery Management Systems is an international certifiable standard providing requirements for establishing, implementing, and improving an ABMS. It focuses on preventing, detecting, and responding to bribery risks across organizations, using a risk-based, proportionate approach aligned with the ISO Harmonized Structure and PDCA cycle.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operations, evaluation, improvement.
    • Core elements: anti-bribery policy, risk assessments, due diligence, financial/non-financial controls, training, reporting, audits.
    • Built on proportionality to bribery risks; optional third-party certification with surveillance audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mitigates legal risks (e.g., FCPA, UK Bribery Act) via evidentiary due diligence.
    • Enhances reputation, stakeholder trust, ESG alignment; reduces compliance costs up to 15%.
    • Provides competitive edge in tenders, third-party management; drives cultural integrity.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, control design, training rollout, audits.
    • Scalable for all sizes/sectors; 6-12 months typical; certification via accredited bodies.

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

    What It Is

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) is China's mandatory regulatory framework for graded cybersecurity of information systems, mandated by the 2016 Cybersecurity Law (Article 21). It classifies networks into five levels based on compromise impact to national security, social order, and public interests, applying impact-based risk assessment across technical, governance, and physical domains.

    Key Components

    • Core pillars: physical security, network protection, data security, access control, monitoring, governance.
    • Standards like GB/T 22239-2019, GB/T 25070-2019 define controls; extended for cloud, IoT, big data.
    • Built on common baselines plus level-specific requirements; compliance via PSB filing, third-party audits (70/100 score minimum for Level 2+).

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Legal obligation for China network operators; avoids fines, suspensions.
    • Enhances resilience, aligns with data laws; builds regulator trust.
    • Competitive edge in critical sectors like finance, energy.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: classify, gap analysis, remediate, audit, ongoing re-evaluation.
    • Applies to all sizes in China; Level 2+ needs licensed audits, PSB approval. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    AspectISO 37001MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    ScopeAnti-bribery management systems onlyAll network cybersecurity graded protection
    IndustryAll sectors globally, any organizationAll network operators in China specifically
    NatureVoluntary international certification standardMandatory national regulatory scheme enforced by PSBs
    TestingThird-party certification audits, PDCA cycleExpert reviews, PSB approvals, periodic re-evaluations
    PenaltiesNo legal penalties, loss of certificationFines, operational suspensions, enforcement actions

    Scope

    ISO 37001
    Anti-bribery management systems only
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    All network cybersecurity graded protection

    Industry

    ISO 37001
    All sectors globally, any organization
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    All network operators in China specifically

    Nature

    ISO 37001
    Voluntary international certification standard
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Mandatory national regulatory scheme enforced by PSBs

    Testing

    ISO 37001
    Third-party certification audits, PDCA cycle
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Expert reviews, PSB approvals, periodic re-evaluations

    Penalties

    ISO 37001
    No legal penalties, loss of certification
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Fines, operational suspensions, enforcement actions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 37001 and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    ISO 37001 FAQ

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)

    CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)

    Tactical CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 playbook for ransomware resilience. 30-60-90 day sprint with tool-agnostic tasks, ownership & evidence checklists to prove progre

    What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

    What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

    Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws

    Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists

    Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists

    Discover 10 common SOC 2 Type 2 audit pitfalls like evidence gaps, scope creep, vendor oversights. Get Fail/Pass visuals, client stories, checklists for 95% fir

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how ISO 37001 and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) compare against other standards

    Other ISO 37001 Comparisons

    • ISO 37001 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • ISO 37001 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    • CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs ISO 37001
    • NIST CSF vs ISO 37001
    • EPA vs ISO 37001

    Other MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Comparisons

    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • ISO 31000 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • HIPAA vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 28000
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 30301
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved