Standards Comparison

    ISO 37301

    Voluntary
    2021

    Certifiable international standard for compliance management systems

    VS

    ISO 31000

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standard for risk management guidelines

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 37301 provides certifiable CMS requirements for compliance obligations across all organizations, while ISO 31000 offers non-certifiable guidelines for enterprise risk management. Companies adopt 37301 for audited assurance and 31000 for flexible, integrated risk practices.

    Compliance Management

    ISO 37301

    ISO 37301:2021 Compliance management systems – Requirements

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Certifiable requirements replacing guidance-only ISO 19600
    • High-Level Structure enables IMS integration
    • Risk-based approach to obligations and controls
    • Leadership commitment builds compliance culture
    • Mandatory whistleblowing protections and investigations
    Risk Management

    ISO 31000

    ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Eight principles guiding effective risk management
    • Framework emphasizing leadership and integration
    • Iterative six-step risk management process
    • Non-certifiable guidelines for all organizations
    • Focus on human cultural factors and continual improvement

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 37301 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 37301:2021 is a certifiable international standard titled Compliance management systems – Requirements with guidance for use. It specifies requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an effective CMS, applicable to all organization sizes and sectors. It uses a risk-based, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) methodology aligned with the ISO High-Level Structure (HLS).

    Key Components

    • **Leadership and commitmentTop management accountability, compliance policy, culture.
    • **PlanningRisk assessment, objectives, compliance obligations.
    • **SupportResources, competence (per ISO 37303), awareness, whistleblowing.
    • **OperationControls, third-party management, investigations.
    • **Performance evaluationMonitoring, audits, management reviews (per ISO 37302).
    • **ImprovementCorrective actions, continual enhancement. Follows HLS with certifiable requirements via accredited bodies.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives regulatory compliance, risk reduction, ethical culture amid ESG pressures. Provides third-party certification for stakeholder trust, investor confidence, reputational protection. Enables IMS integration, supports UN SDGs, mitigates fines/litigation.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: context analysis, obligation register, controls, training, audits. Scalable for SMEs/enterprises; 3-year certification cycle. Involves leadership buy-in, platforms for registers/KPIs; prepares via gap analysis, ANAB-accredited auditors. (178 words)

    ISO 31000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines is an international standard providing non-certifiable guidance for enterprise-wide risk management. Its primary purpose is to help organizations manage uncertainty affecting objectives through principles, framework, and process. The risk-based approach defines risk as "the effect of uncertainty on objectives," encompassing both threats and opportunities.

    Key Components

    • **Three pillars8 principles (e.g., integrated, customized, dynamic), framework (leadership, integration, design, implementation, evaluation, improvement), and 6-step process (communication, scope/context/criteria, assessment, treatment, monitoring/review, recording/reporting).
    • No fixed controls; flexible, principles-based.
    • Built on PDCA cycle; not certifiable.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enhances decision-making, resilience, value creation/protection.
    • Supports governance, strategy; builds stakeholder trust.
    • Applicable to any size/sector; aligns with regulations like ISO 27001.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: leadership alignment, gap analysis, pilot, rollout, monitoring.
    • Involves policy, training, tools (e.g., GRC platforms).
    • Universal applicability; internal audits for assurance, no external certification.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 37301
    Compliance obligations, risks, CMS requirements
    ISO 31000
    All risks affecting objectives, enterprise-wide

    Industry

    ISO 37301
    All sectors, sizes, global applicability
    ISO 31000
    All sectors, sizes, global applicability

    Nature

    ISO 37301
    Certifiable requirements standard
    ISO 31000
    Non-certifiable guidelines only

    Testing

    ISO 37301
    Accredited certification audits, surveillance
    ISO 31000
    Internal audits, management reviews, no certification

    Penalties

    ISO 37301
    Loss of certification, no legal penalties
    ISO 31000
    No penalties, voluntary adoption

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 37301 and ISO 31000

    ISO 37301 FAQ

    ISO 31000 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages