ISO 37301
Certifiable international standard for compliance management systems
WELL
Certification framework for occupant health in buildings
Quick Verdict
ISO 37301 establishes certifiable compliance management systems for risk-based integrity across organizations, while WELL certifies buildings for occupant health via air, water, and wellness metrics. Companies adopt ISO 37301 for governance assurance; WELL for productivity and ESG differentiation.
ISO 37301
ISO 37301:2021 Compliance management systems – Requirements with guidance
Key Features
- Certifiable requirements standard replacing guidance-only ISO 19600
- High-Level Structure alignment for IMS integration
- Risk-based compliance obligations identification and management
- Top management commitment and culture emphasis
- Confidential whistleblowing channels with anti-retaliation protections
WELL
WELL Building Standard v2
Key Features
- 10 core concepts covering air to community health
- Mandatory preconditions and point-based optimizations
- On-site performance verification testing required
- Tiered certifications from Bronze to Platinum
- Continuous monitoring pathways for compliance
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 37301 Details
What It Is
ISO 37301:2021 – Compliance management systems – Requirements with guidance for use is a certifiable international standard specifying requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving effective Compliance Management Systems (CMS). It applies universally across organization sizes and sectors, using a risk-based approach and Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle aligned with ISO High-Level Structure (HLS).
Key Components
- Core clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Emphasizes leadership commitment, compliance culture, whistleblowing protections, risk assessment, monitoring, audits, and continual improvement.
- Built on HLS for integration; supports companion standards like ISO 37302 (effectiveness) and ISO 37303 (competence).
- Certification via accredited bodies (e.g., ANAB).
Why Organizations Use It
- Demonstrates systematic compliance to stakeholders, reduces risks/fines, enhances reputation.
- Meets investor/ESG demands; provides audit evidence.
- Drives efficiency, cultural integrity; supports UN SDGs.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, obligation register, controls, training, audits.
- Scalable for SMEs/enterprises; 3-year certification cycle.
- Global applicability; 2024 Amendment adds climate action.
WELL Details
What It Is
The WELL Building Standard (WELL v2) is a performance-based certification framework administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI). It focuses on designing, operating, and verifying buildings to advance human health and well-being through evidence-based strategies across environmental quality, operations, and policies.
Key Components
- **10 core conceptsAir, Water, Nourishment, Light, Movement, Thermal Comfort, Sound, Materials, Mind, Community (plus Innovation).
- 24 Preconditions (mandatory) and 102 Optimizations (point-based).
- Built on public health research; certification via Bronze (40 pts), Silver (50), Gold (60), Platinum (80) with concept minimums.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enhances occupant productivity, retention, ESG reporting.
- Differentiates assets with verified health outcomes.
- Mitigates risks like poor IEQ; boosts rents/values.
- Builds stakeholder trust via rigorous verification.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, scorecard, documentation, on-site testing, recertification (3 years).
- Applies to new/existing buildings, all sizes/industries.
- Requires third-party review and performance verification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 37301 | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Compliance obligations, risks, culture across operations | Building health, air/water quality, occupant well-being |
| Industry | All sectors, sizes, global applicability | Real estate, offices, healthcare, global buildings |
| Nature | Voluntary certifiable management system standard | Voluntary performance-based building certification |
| Testing | Accredited audits, 3-year certification cycles | On-site performance verification, 3-year recertification |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 37301 and WELL
ISO 37301 FAQ
WELL FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for

Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software boosts HR, IT, finance & more: automate risks, enhance efficiency, ensure data integrity, stay audit-ready. Elevate y
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
SAFe vs SAMA CSF
SAFe vs SAMA CSF: Scale agile enterprises with SAFe's frameworks or secure finance via SAMA's maturity model. Key differences, benefits & strategies for IT leaders. Dive in!
C-TPAT vs ISO 56002
Discover C-TPAT vs ISO 56002: C-TPAT secures supply chains via trusted trader benefits; ISO 56002 builds innovation systems. Compare for compliance, security & growth edge.
NIST 800-53 vs ISO 28000
Compare NIST 800-53 vs ISO 28000: Cyber controls catalog meets supply chain security system. Uncover baselines, risks, RMF integration & PDCA to choose your framework. (152)