What is the primary objective of **SAFe**?

**The primary objective of SAFe is to scale Lean-Agile practices across large enterprises to achieve Business Agility by aligning strategy, execution, and operations.** SAFe integrates 10 immutable Lean-Agile principles, such as taking an economic view and organizing around value, with seven core competencies including Lean-Agile Leadership and Continuous Learning Culture. This enables predictable value delivery through structures like Agile Release Trains (ARTs) of 50-125 people and Program Increments (PIs) of 8-12 weeks.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SAFe**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with SAFe, as it is a voluntary framework for enterprise agility.** Professionally, large enterprises with hundreds of teams in software development and IT operations adopt SAFe to address scaling challenges, with over 20,000 organizations and 1 million certified practitioners using its configurations from Essential to Full SAFe for alignment and flow.

Does **SAFe** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**SAFe does not require external audits or third-party certification.** It relies on internal practices like Inspect and Adapt workshops at the end of each PI, with certifications such as SAFe Agilist or Release Train Engineer (RTE) obtained through Scaled Agile's academy for role proficiency, ensuring self-assessed maturity via metrics like velocity and flow.

How often should an assessment for **SAFe** be performed?

**SAFe assessments should be performed at the end of each Program Increment (PI), typically every 8-12 weeks.** This occurs during Inspect and Adapt events, incorporating retrospectives, quantitative metrics review (e.g., PI objectives achievement), and ROAM risk analysis to drive continuous improvement across ARTs.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SAFe**?

**There are no legal consequences for non-compliance with SAFe, as it is not a regulatory standard.** Internal risks include siloed teams, dependency chaos, delayed time-to-market, and failed enterprise agility, potentially leading to 30-70% transformation failure rates from poor implementation, such as inadequate leadership buy-in or unaddressed value stream impediments.

Can **SAFe** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SAFe can be mapped to other international frameworks through its flexible principles and configurations.** Its Lean-Agile foundations align with practices in Scrum, Kanban, LeSS, and DevOps, with tools like Jira Align facilitating integrations for portfolio oversight and compliance embedding in regulated environments.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SAFe**?

**The first step to implement SAFe is to conduct Leading SAFe training for executives and form a Lean-Agile Center of Excellence (LACE).** This is followed by value stream identification and mapping to determine ART boundaries, per the SAFe Implementation Roadmap, enabling phased rollout from Essential SAFe.

What is the primary objective of **SAMA CSF**?

**SAMA CSF aims to create a common cybersecurity approach across regulated financial institutions, achieve appropriate maturity levels, and ensure proper risk management.** Issued in Version 1.0 (May 2017), it prescribes principles, objectives, and controls across four domains—Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, Risk Management and Compliance, Operations and Technology, and Third Party Cyber Security—to protect information assets' confidentiality, integrity, and availability. It uses a six-level maturity model, targeting at least Level 3 (structured policies, standards, procedures, and KPIs).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SAMA CSF**?

**SAMA CSF is mandatory for all SAMA-regulated entities, including banks, insurance/reinsurance companies, financing companies, credit bureaus, and financial market infrastructure providers.** All domains apply fully to banks; non-banks have tailored exceptions (e.g., excluding payment systems unless handling cards/SWIFT). Boards, senior management, CISOs (Saudi nationals with SAMA no-objection), and functions like risk, IT, and compliance must implement it.

Does **SAMA CSF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, SAMA CSF requires periodic self-assessments using SAMA-provided questionnaires, with supervisory review and internal/external audits, but no formal third-party certification.** Internal audits follow accepted standards; SAMA conducts reviews for maturity (minimum Level 3) and compliance. Evidence includes policies, risk registers, and control artifacts.

How often should an assessment for **SAMA CSF** be performed?

**SAMA CSF mandates periodic self-assessments via official questionnaires, with annual reviews of critical assets and more frequent testing like penetration tests.** Maturity levels are evaluated ongoing, with KRIs/KPIs at Level 4+; internal audits align with institutional plans, and SAMA reviews submissions for benchmarking and enforcement.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SAMA CSF**?

**Non-compliance with SAMA CSF triggers regulatory enforcement, including supervisory actions, remediation demands, heightened scrutiny, audit findings, and potential operational restrictions.** As a mandated framework, violations fall under SAMA's banking/insurance powers, risking fines, business conditions, reputational damage, and systemic interventions for critical incidents.

Can **SAMA CSF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SAMA CSF conceptually aligns with NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, BASEL, and SWIFT CSCF, enabling control mappings for integrated compliance.** Its principle-based structure and maturity model map to NIST functions (Identify-Protect-Detect-Respond-Recover) and ISO 27001 ISMS, though SAMA adds sector-specific mandates like e-banking MFA and data residency.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SAMA CSF**?

**The first step is securing Board/senior management sponsorship and conducting a gap analysis against SAMA CSF controls and maturity model (targeting Level 3 minimum).** Establish governance (Cyber Security Committee, CISO), inventory assets, perform baseline self-assessment, and produce a gap register to inform a phased roadmap.

SAFe vs SAMA CSF

Standards Comparison

SAFe

Voluntary

2023

Framework scaling Lean-Agile practices enterprise-wide

SAMA CSF

Mandatory

2017

Saudi regulatory framework for financial cybersecurity compliance

Quick Verdict

SAFe scales Agile for enterprise software delivery worldwide, while SAMA CSF mandates cybersecurity for Saudi financial institutions. Companies adopt SAFe for agility and speed-to-market; SAMA CSF ensures regulatory compliance and resilience against cyber threats.

Agile Scaling

SAFe

Scaled Agile Framework 6.0 (SAFe)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Synchronizes 50-125 people in Agile Release Trains (ARTs)
Delivers value via 8-12 week Program Increments (PIs)
Guided by 10 immutable Lean-Agile principles
Powered by 7 core competencies for Business Agility
Scalable configurations from Essential to Full SAFe

Cybersecurity

SAMA CSF

SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Six-level maturity model targeting Level 3 minimum
Four core domains with detailed subdomains
Board oversight and independent CISO requirements
Principle-based risk management and controls
Third-party cybersecurity due diligence mandates

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SAFe Details

What It Is

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) 6.0 is a comprehensive framework for scaling Lean-Agile practices across large enterprises. It enables Business Agility by aligning strategy, execution, and operations in software development and IT. Key approach integrates Agile, Lean, systems thinking, and DevOps for value stream delivery.

Key Components

**Agile Release Trains (ARTs)50-125 cross-functional teams.
**Program Increments (PIs)8-12 week cadences with PI Planning.
10 immutable Lean-Agile principles and 7 core competencies (e.g., Lean-Agile Leadership, Continuous Learning Culture).
Roles like Release Train Engineer (RTE); events like Inspect & Adapt.
Four configurations: Essential, Large Solution, Portfolio, Full. No mandatory certification, but SAFe trainings available.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives 20-50% faster time-to-market, 30-75% productivity gains, quality improvements. Voluntary adoption for enterprise-scale agility, compliance embedding (GDPR/SOC 2), risk reduction via flow metrics. Builds stakeholder trust, competitive edge in regulated IT/software sectors.

Implementation Overview

Follow phased **Implementation Roadmapleadership training, value stream mapping, ART launches. Key activities: certifications (Agilist, RTE), PI events, tool integrations (Jira, Vanta). Suited for large enterprises; 12-18 months typical.

SAMA CSF Details

What It Is

The Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority Cyber Security Framework (SAMA CSF Version 1.0, May 2017) is a mandatory regulatory framework for SAMA-regulated financial institutions in Saudi Arabia. Its primary purpose is to ensure cybersecurity resilience through governance, controls, and maturity assessment, focusing on detecting, resisting, responding to, and recovering from cyber threats. It employs a principle-based, risk-oriented, outcome-focused approach with a six-level maturity model.

Key Components

Four principal **domainsCyber Security Leadership & Governance, Risk Management & Compliance, Operations & Technology, Third-Party Cyber Security.
Numerous subdomains with principles, objectives, and control considerations (114+ subcontrols).
Built on NIST, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS alignments; minimum Level 3 maturity via self-assessments.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory compliance for banks, insurers, etc., avoiding fines and audits.
Enhances resilience, reduces incidents, enables partnerships.
Builds board-level risk management and stakeholder trust.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, deployment, monitoring.
Targets SAMA-regulated financial entities; involves governance setup, controls, audits.

Key Differences

Aspect	SAFe	SAMA CSF
Scope	Scaling Agile for enterprise software/IT delivery	Cybersecurity controls for financial operations
Industry	Software, IT operations globally, all sizes	Saudi financial sector only, regulated entities
Nature	Voluntary framework with certifications	Mandatory regulatory standard with audits
Testing	PI Planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops	Periodic self-assessments, SAMA audits
Penalties	No legal penalties, certification loss	Fines, license suspension, enforcement actions

Scope

SAFe

Scaling Agile for enterprise software/IT delivery

SAMA CSF

Cybersecurity controls for financial operations

Industry

SAFe

Software, IT operations globally, all sizes

SAMA CSF

Saudi financial sector only, regulated entities

Nature

SAFe

Voluntary framework with certifications

SAMA CSF

Mandatory regulatory standard with audits

Testing

SAFe

PI Planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops

SAMA CSF

Periodic self-assessments, SAMA audits

Penalties

SAFe

No legal penalties, certification loss

SAMA CSF

Fines, license suspension, enforcement actions

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SAFe and SAMA CSF

SAFe FAQ

SAMA CSF FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Regulatory Radar: How Data-Driven Compliance Tools Provide Strategic Foresight

Unlock strategic foresight with data-driven compliance tools. Act as your regulatory radar: real-time monitoring, automated insights, and 3x cost cuts. Anticipa

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization

Master NIS2 implementation with our detailed guide. Learn requirements, risk assessment, supply chain security, and compliance steps for your organization. Star

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

COBIT vs EMAS

COBIT vs EMAS: IT governance powerhouse vs EU environmental excellence. Uncover key differences, strengths, implementation tips & choose the optimal framework for compliance & performance now!

ISO 20000 vs 23 NYCRR 500

Compare ISO 20000 vs 23 NYCRR 500: ITSM excellence meets NYDFS cybersecurity mandates. Uncover key diffs, compliance strategies & integration for resilient financial services. Dive in now!

Six Sigma vs ISO 21001

Discover Six Sigma vs ISO 21001: Data-driven DMAIC vs learner-focused EOMS. Compare for process excellence, quality gains & education outcomes. Choose wisely today!

SAFe

SAMA CSF

Quick Verdict

SAFe

Key Features

SAMA CSF

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SAFe Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

SAMA CSF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SAFe FAQ

What is the primary objective of SAFe?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SAFe?

Does SAFe require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SAFe be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SAFe?

Can SAFe be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SAFe?

SAMA CSF FAQ

What is the primary objective of SAMA CSF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SAMA CSF?

Does SAMA CSF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SAMA CSF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SAMA CSF?

Can SAMA CSF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SAMA CSF?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Regulatory Radar: How Data-Driven Compliance Tools Provide Strategic Foresight

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

COBIT vs EMAS

ISO 20000 vs 23 NYCRR 500

Six Sigma vs ISO 21001