ISO 45001
International standard for occupational health and safety management systems
ISO 17025
International standard for testing and calibration laboratory competence.
Quick Verdict
ISO 45001 provides OH&S management systems for all organizations to prevent workplace injuries, while ISO 17025 ensures laboratory competence for valid testing results. Companies adopt 45001 for safety culture and 17025 for market-trusted measurements and accreditation.
ISO 45001
ISO 45001:2018 Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems
Key Features
- Leadership accountability with worker participation requirements
- Risk-based approach to hazards and opportunities
- Hierarchy of controls prioritizing hazard elimination
- Annex SL structure for integrated management systems
- PDCA cycle driving continual improvement
ISO 17025
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for laboratory competence
Key Features
- Risk-based impartiality and confidentiality requirements
- Personnel competence lifecycle management and records
- Metrological traceability and measurement uncertainty evaluation
- Method selection, validation, and verification processes
- Proficiency testing for ongoing result validity
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 45001 Details
What It Is
ISO 45001:2018 is the international standard for Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems (OHSMS). It provides a framework to prevent work-related injuries and ill health, improve OH&S performance, using a risk-based approach aligned with Annex SL (High-Level Structure) for integration with other ISO standards like ISO 9001 and 14001.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement.
- Emphasizes hierarchy of controls, worker participation, and PDCA cycle.
- No fixed number of controls; scalable requirements.
- Optional third-party certification via audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Reduces incidents, legal risks, and costs (e.g., 22.6% accident frequency drop).
- Enhances resilience, insurance savings, talent retention.
- Builds stakeholder trust, supply-chain competitiveness.
- Voluntary but strategic for high-risk sectors.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, policy/objectives, controls, audits (6-12 months typical).
- Applicable to all sizes/sectors; focuses on leadership, worker engagement.
- Involves training, documented information, internal audits, management reviews.
ISO 17025 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 17025:2017, titled "General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories," is an international accreditation standard. It demonstrates labs' competence, impartiality, and consistent operation for technically valid results. Adopts a risk-based, performance-oriented approach with eight structural elements.
Key Components
- **GeneralImpartiality, confidentiality.
- **StructuralOrganization, leadership.
- **ResourcesPersonnel competence, facilities, equipment, traceability.
- **ProcessesMethods, sampling, uncertainty, reporting.
- **Management systemOption A/B, audits, reviews. Core on metrological traceability, method validation; ILAC-recognized accreditation.
Why Organizations Use It
- Ensures global result acceptance, regulatory compliance.
- Mitigates invalid data risks in safety-critical decisions.
- Builds trust, enables market access, competitive edge.
- Improves efficiency via systematic controls.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: Gap analysis, documentation, training, validation, internal audits.
- Suits all lab sizes/industries worldwide.
- Requires accreditation body assessments, witnessed testing. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 45001 | ISO 17025 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Occupational health & safety management systems | Testing & calibration laboratory competence |
| Industry | All sectors, high-risk industries emphasized | Testing labs across industries, manufacturing focus |
| Nature | Voluntary management system certification | Laboratory accreditation for technical competence |
| Testing | Internal audits, management reviews, performance monitoring | Proficiency testing, witnessed technical assessments |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Loss of accreditation, rejected test results |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 45001 and ISO 17025
ISO 45001 FAQ
ISO 17025 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Practical Implementation Blueprint for Regulation S-K Item 106: Cybersecurity Governance and Risk Management Disclosures in 10-Ks
Step-by-step guide for Item 106 cybersecurity disclosures in 10-Ks: risk management, board oversight, Inline XBRL templates (Dec 2024 compliance). Templates for
One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA
Achieve DORA compliance in 6 months with our detailed plan. Learn implementation sequence, starting steps, pitfalls to avoid, and accelerators for success. Toug
CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)
Tactical CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 playbook for ransomware resilience. 30-60-90 day sprint with tool-agnostic tasks, ownership & evidence checklists to prove progre
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
GDPR vs EU AI Act
Compare GDPR vs EU AI Act: Privacy gold standard meets AI risk rules. Uncover key differences, overlaps in data governance, fines & compliance strategies. Navigate EU regs now!
K-PIPA vs ISO 26000
Compare K-PIPA vs ISO 26000: Korea's strict privacy law meets global SR guidance. Uncover consent rules, CPO mandates, breaches & integration for compliance mastery. Dive in!
ISO 13485 vs ISO 30301
Compare ISO 13485 vs ISO 30301: Medical QMS rigor meets records governance. Uncover risks, compliance diffs & strategies for devices. Boost your edge now!