ISO 45001
International standard for occupational health and safety management systems
PDPA
Singapore regulation for personal data protection
Quick Verdict
ISO 45001 provides voluntary OH&S management certification for global workplaces, while PDPA mandates data protection compliance for Singapore organisations. Companies adopt ISO 45001 to reduce injuries and integrate safety systems; PDPA to avoid fines and build data trust.
ISO 45001
ISO 45001:2018 Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems
Key Features
- Mandates top management accountability and worker participation
- Implements hierarchy of controls prioritizing hazard elimination
- Addresses risks and opportunities proactively in planning
- Aligns with Annex SL for integrated management systems
- Drives continual improvement through PDCA cycle
PDPA
Personal Data Protection Act 2012
Key Features
- Mandatory Data Protection Officer appointment
- 72-hour data breach notification obligation
- Consent with structured exceptions framework
- Cross-border transfer limitation controls
- Accountability via DPMP requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 45001 Details
What It Is
ISO 45001:2018 is the international standard for Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems (OHSMS). It establishes requirements to prevent work-related injury, ill health, and improve OH&S performance through a risk-based approach, PDCA cycle, and Annex SL High-Level Structure for harmonization with other ISO standards.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–10: context, leadership/worker participation, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement
- Hierarchy of controls, management of change, contractor controls, emergency preparedness
- Outcome-focused; no fixed controls count
- Optional certification by accredited bodies
Why Organizations Use It
- Proactive risk reduction lowers incidents, costs, insurance premiums
- Strengthens leadership accountability, worker engagement, culture
- Meets legal/other requirements, supply-chain demands
- Boosts reputation, resilience, talent retention, competitive edge
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, policy/objectives, resources/training, controls/operations, monitoring/audits, reviews/improvement
- Scalable across sizes/sectors; typically 6–12 months
- Global; Stage 1/2 certification audits
- Emphasizes evidence, continual improvement, IMS integration
PDPA Details
What It Is
PDPA (Personal Data Protection Act 2012) is Singapore's principles-based regulation governing collection, use, disclosure, and protection of personal data by organizations. It balances individual privacy rights with legitimate business needs, administered by the Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC). Scope covers private sector organizations handling identifiable data, with extraterritorial elements for Singapore data.
Key Components
- Nine core obligations: consent, notification, access/correction, accuracy, protection, retention limitation, transfer limitation, accountability, breach notification.
- Built on reasonableness and proportionality; mandatory DPO appointment.
- Compliance via Data Protection Management Programme (DPMP); no formal certification but PDPC audits/enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for Singapore operations to avoid fines up to SGD 1M or 10% global revenue.
- Enhances trust, enables data-driven innovation, mitigates breach risks.
- Builds competitive edge in privacy-conscious markets.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: governance/DPO setup, data mapping/DPIAs, policies/controls, training/audits. Applies to all sizes/industries in Singapore; 12-18 months typical for mid-sized firms, focusing on risk-based controls.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 45001 | PDPA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Occupational health & safety management systems | Personal data collection, use, disclosure, protection |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide, scalable to all sizes | All private sector organisations in specific countries |
| Nature | Voluntary international certification standard | Mandatory national data protection legislation |
| Testing | Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits | Self-assessments, DPIAs, breach simulations, PDPC inspections |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no direct legal fines | Fines up to S$1M or 10% global revenue, enforcement actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 45001 and PDPA
ISO 45001 FAQ
PDPA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond
Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro

Beyond the Checkbox: Why Maturity Assessments are the Secret to Sustainable Compliance
Discover why maturity assessments beat binary compliance checks by uncovering hidden gaps and enabling continuous improvement for sustainable success. Read now!

CMMC Scoping Mastery for Defense Supply Chains: Enclave Mapping, Subcontractor Flow-Down, and CUI Inventory Blueprint
Master CMMC scoping for DIB: delineate FCI/CUI boundaries, segment enclaves, manage subcontractor flow-down. Prevent 80% assessment failures with SSP templates,
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PIPL vs ISA 95
Compare PIPL vs ISA 95: China's GDPR-like privacy law meets manufacturing's enterprise-control standard. Unlock compliance strategies, risks, and integration tips for global ops. Dive in!
ISO 26000 vs FedRAMP
ISO 26000 vs FedRAMP: Voluntary SR guidance meets U.S. federal cloud security. Compare principles, controls, non-certifiable vs mandatory paths, and strategic value for compliance. Dive in!
ISO 37301 vs IATF 16949
ISO 37301 vs IATF 16949: Compare certifiable CMS & automotive QMS. Uncover HLS alignment, risk planning, leadership & core tools for seamless IMS integration. Optimize compliance now!