ISO 55001
International standard for asset management systems
ISO 30301
International standard for management systems for records
Quick Verdict
ISO 55001 establishes Asset Management Systems for value realization from physical assets, while ISO 30301 creates Management Systems for Records ensuring reliable evidence. Asset-heavy organizations adopt 55001 for lifecycle optimization; all organizations use 30301 for governance, compliance, and auditability.
ISO 55001
ISO 55001:2024 Asset management systems requirements
Key Features
- Requires Strategic Asset Management Plan (SAMP) linking strategy to operations
- Follows Annex SL structure for integration with other ISO standards
- Applies PDCA cycle across Clauses 4-10 for continual improvement
- Mandates formal asset decision-making framework (2024 revision)
- Balances asset performance, risks, and costs over lifecycle
ISO 30301
ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records requirements
Key Features
- High-Level Structure alignment for MSS integration
- Normative Annex A operational records controls
- Explicit records requirements and risk assessment
- Top management accountability and policy
- Flexible conformity pathways including certification
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 55001 Details
What It Is
ISO 55001:2024 is the international certification standard specifying requirements for an Asset Management System (AMS). It enables organizations to establish, implement, maintain, and improve processes that realize value from assets across lifecycles. Applicable to asset-intensive sectors, it uses a risk-based, PDCA management system approach aligned with Annex SL.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- 72 mandatory 'shall' requirements, including SAMP, decision-making framework, risk/opportunity actions.
- Built on ISO 55000 terminology and PDCA cycle.
- Supports certification via accredited audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives lifecycle value optimization, cost/risk/performance balance.
- Meets regulatory/contractual needs, enhances resilience.
- Builds stakeholder trust, breaks silos, enables integration with ISO 9001/14001.
- Provides competitive edge in utilities, infrastructure, manufacturing.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, SAMP development, competence building, operational controls.
- Suits mid-to-large organizations globally; 12-24 months typical.
- Involves leadership commitment, data governance, audits for certification.
ISO 30301 Details
What It Is
ISO 30301:2019 (Information and documentation — Management systems for records — Requirements) is an international certifiable standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a Management System for Records (MSR). It ensures organizations create and control reliable evidence of business activities, supporting mandate, strategy, and goals. Built on the High-Level Structure (HLS) with a risk-based PDCA approach, it integrates governance and operational controls.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- **Annex A (normative)operational requirements for records processes, controls, systems.
- Principles: authenticity, reliability, integrity, usability.
- Conformity pathways: self-declaration, external confirmation, third-party certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Strengthens compliance, auditability, transparency.
- Mitigates risks (loss, alteration, retention failures).
- Boosts efficiency, decision-making, stakeholder trust.
- Integrates with ISO 9001, 27001 for unified governance.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, policy/roles design, lifecycle controls, training, audits. Scalable for any organization, sector, size; certification via accredited bodies optional.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 55001 | ISO 30301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Asset Management System requirements | Management System for Records requirements |
| Industry | Asset-intensive sectors worldwide | All organizations worldwide |
| Nature | Voluntary certification standard | Voluntary certification standard |
| Testing | Internal audits, management reviews | Internal audits, management reviews |
| Penalties | Loss of certification | Loss of certification |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 55001 and ISO 30301
ISO 55001 FAQ
ISO 30301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)
Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.
You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization
Master NIS2 implementation with our detailed guide. Learn requirements, risk assessment, supply chain security, and compliance steps for your organization. Star
CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
WELL vs CSA
Explore WELL vs CSA: WELL excels in occupant health (Air, Water, Light, Mind) with verified concepts; CSA leads safety standards. Key differences, benefits & certification guide.
EPA vs ISO 27017
Compare EPA standards (CAA, CWA, RCRA) vs ISO 27017: Unpack differences in env compliance, cloud security controls & shared risks. Boost enterprise resilience today.
REACH vs C-TPAT
Compare REACH vs C-TPAT: Master EU chemical regs & US supply chain security. Expert strategies, pitfalls & implementation for importers to ensure compliance & efficiency. (157)