GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/K-PIPA vs EN 1090
    Standards Comparison

    K-PIPA vs EN 1090

    K-PIPA

    Mandatory
    2011

    South Korea's stringent regulation for personal data protection

    VS

    EN 1090

    Mandatory
    2009

    EU standard for execution of steel and aluminium structures

    Quick Verdict

    K-PIPA enforces strict data privacy for Korean operations via consent and CPOs, while EN 1090 mandates CE marking for EU structural steel/aluminium through FPC and welding controls. Companies adopt K-PIPA for compliance in Korea, EN 1090 for market access.

    Data Privacy

    K-PIPA

    Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates independent Chief Privacy Officers for all handlers
    • Requires granular explicit consent for sensitive data transfers
    • Enforces 72-hour breach notifications to subjects and regulators
    • Applies extraterritorially to foreign entities targeting Koreans
    • Imposes fines up to 3% of annual global revenue
    Structural Metalwork

    EN 1090

    EN 1090 Execution of steel and aluminium structures

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based Execution Classes (EXC1-EXC4)
    • Factory Production Control (FPC) certification
    • CE marking and Declaration of Performance
    • Welding coordination per ISO 3834
    • Material traceability and NDT inspection

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    K-PIPA Details

    What It Is

    K-PIPA (Personal Information Protection Act) is South Korea's comprehensive data privacy regulation, enacted in 2011 with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It governs collection, use, storage, transfer, and destruction of personal, sensitive, and unique identification information by domestic and foreign entities processing Korean residents' data. Adopting a consent-centric, risk-based approach, it emphasizes transparency, purpose limitation, and data minimization.

    Key Components

    • Core principles: explicit consent, security safeguards, data subject rights (access, erasure, portability).
    • Mandatory CPOs for accountability, technical controls (encryption, access logs) per 2024 Guidelines.
    • Breach notifications within 72 hours; cross-border transfer restrictions.
    • Enforcement by PIPC with fines up to 3% revenue; no certification but compliance audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Legal mandate for data handlers; mitigates fines (e.g., Google's $50M penalty), builds trust in privacy-sensitive market. Enables EU adequacy data flows, supports AI/innovation via pseudonymization, enhances reputation and market access.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, CPO appointment, policy development, technical controls, training, audits. Applies to all sizes/industries targeting Koreans; ongoing via PIPC guidelines, no formal certification required.

    EN 1090 Details

    What It Is

    EN 1090 is a harmonized European standard family for the execution and conformity assessment of structural steel and aluminium components. It implements the EU Construction Products Regulation (CPR), enabling CE marking. The primary scope covers fabrication, assembly, and assessment of load-bearing components for construction works. It uses a risk-based approach via Execution Classes (EXC1–EXC4), scaling requirements by consequence, service, and production categories.

    Key Components

    • **EN 1090-1Conformity assessment, Factory Production Control (FPC), and Declaration of Performance (DoP).
    • **EN 1090-2/-3Technical rules for steel/aluminium execution (welding, tolerances, corrosion protection, inspection).
    • Core pillars: material traceability, welding coordination (ISO 3834 alignment), NDT, and tolerances.
    • AVCP systems with Notified Body certification and surveillance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for EU market access via CE marking.
    • Reduces liability, ensures safety, and minimizes rework.
    • Builds trust with stakeholders; enables high-risk projects.
    • Competitive edge through certified quality and traceability.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, FPC design, personnel training, NB certification. Applies to fabricators in construction; 6-12 months typical. Requires audits, welding qualifications, and ongoing surveillance. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    AspectK-PIPAEN 1090
    ScopePersonal data protection and privacyStructural steel/aluminium fabrication conformity
    IndustryAll sectors handling Korean dataConstruction, steel/aluminium manufacturing
    NatureMandatory national privacy lawHarmonized execution standard for CE marking
    TestingSecurity audits, breach simulationsFPC certification, welding NDT, NB audits
    Penalties3% revenue fines, imprisonmentMarket exclusion, certificate suspension

    Scope

    K-PIPA
    Personal data protection and privacy
    EN 1090
    Structural steel/aluminium fabrication conformity

    Industry

    K-PIPA
    All sectors handling Korean data
    EN 1090
    Construction, steel/aluminium manufacturing

    Nature

    K-PIPA
    Mandatory national privacy law
    EN 1090
    Harmonized execution standard for CE marking

    Testing

    K-PIPA
    Security audits, breach simulations
    EN 1090
    FPC certification, welding NDT, NB audits

    Penalties

    K-PIPA
    3% revenue fines, imprisonment
    EN 1090
    Market exclusion, certificate suspension

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about K-PIPA and EN 1090

    K-PIPA FAQ

    EN 1090 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: 10 Red Flags Auditors Flag and Model Answers for Walkthroughs

    SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: 10 Red Flags Auditors Flag and Model Answers for Walkthroughs

    Master SOC 2 Type 2 audits with our guide: 10 red flags like incomplete logs/vendor gaps, model walkthrough answers, psychology tips. Pass first-time with <5% e

    The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability

    The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability

    Transform your SOC into a service provider using maturity assessments to standardize workflows, guarantee SLOs, and ensure predictability amid turnover and risi

    What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

    What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

    Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how K-PIPA and EN 1090 compare against other standards

    Other K-PIPA Comparisons

    • NIST CSF vs K-PIPA
    • K-PIPA vs IEC 62443
    • ITIL vs K-PIPA
    • GDPR vs K-PIPA
    • SAFe vs K-PIPA

    Other EN 1090 Comparisons

    • EN 1090 vs NERC CIP
    • EN 1090 vs GRI
    • EPA vs EN 1090
    • SQF vs EN 1090
    • ISO 14001 vs EN 1090
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved