What is the primary objective of **LGPD**?

**The primary objective of LGPD is to protect the fundamental rights of privacy and freedom of natural persons by establishing rules for personal data processing.** Enacted as Law No. 13.709/2018 on August 14, 2018, it unifies fragmented regulations, enforces 10 core principles (e.g., purpose limitation, necessity, accountability under Art. 6), and grants data subjects rights like access, deletion, and portability (Art. 18), while mandating controllers and processors to ensure security and transparency.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **LGPD**?

**All controllers and processors handling personal data of Brazilian residents must comply with LGPD, regardless of company size or location.** Its extraterritorial scope (Art. 3) applies to any processing in Brazil, targeting Brazilian residents, or collecting data there, including global firms in e-commerce, fintech, and cloud services; no employee/revenue thresholds exempt entities, with DPOs mandatory for controllers (Art. 41, exemptions limited to small/low-risk per ANPD regs).

Does **LGPD** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**LGPD does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** The ANPD conducts audits (Art. 55), but organizations must maintain Records of Processing Activities (Art. 37, simplified for small entities per CD/ANPD 02/2022), perform DPIAs for high-risk processing (Art. 38), and demonstrate compliance via internal governance, security measures, and incident logs retained for 5 years.

How often should an assessment for **LGPD** be performed?

**LGPD assessments, including DPIAs and Records of Processing Activities reviews, should be performed continuously, with formal updates at least annually or upon significant changes.** ANPD guidance requires ongoing monitoring of high-risk activities (e.g., legitimate interests balancing tests), quarterly internal audits for key KPIs like DSRs, and ad-hoc reassessments for new processing, transfers, or incidents per Resolution CD/ANPD No. 15/2024.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **LGPD**?

**Non-compliance with LGPD incurs graduated sanctions by ANPD, including fines up to 2% of Brazilian revenue (capped at R$50 million per infraction), data processing suspension up to 6 months, and publicity of violations.** Additional penalties encompass warnings, daily fines, data blocking/deletion, and operational prohibitions (Art. 52-53), factoring gravity, cooperation, and reoccurrence, plus civil claims for damages (Art. 42).

Can **LGPD** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, LGPD can be mapped to other international frameworks due to shared principles like purpose limitation, minimization, and data subject rights.** Its 10 principles (Art. 6), 10 legal bases (Art. 7), and extraterritorial scope align closely with global regimes, enabling hybrid programs; ANPD-approved SCCs (Resolution CD/ANPD No. 19/2024) facilitate transfers without adequacy decisions.

What is the first step to begin implementing **LGPD**?

**The first step to implement LGPD is appointing a Data Protection Officer (DPO) and conducting a comprehensive data mapping to create a Record of Processing Activities (RoPA).** Per Art. 41 and implementation frameworks, secure executive sponsorship, inventory data flows/purposes/bases (Art. 37), identify sensitive data/high-risk processing, and prioritize gap analysis for principles, rights, and transfers.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 20000**?

**The primary objective of ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 is to specify requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving a service management system (SMS).** This SMS ensures organizations deliver services that consistently meet agreed requirements across the full service lifecycle—planning, design, transition, delivery, and improvement—using the **Annex SL high-level structure** (Clauses 4–10) and **Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA)** cycle. Core elements include operational processes in Clause 8 (service portfolio, relationship/agreement, supply/demand, design/build/transition, resolution/fulfilment, service assurance) with mandatory practices like incident management, change management, configuration management, and service continuity.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 20000**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 20000, as it is a voluntary international standard.** Professionally, it applies to any service provider—regardless of size or industry—delivering IT-enabled, cloud, managed, or business process services, including enterprises, MSPs, and internal IT departments seeking certification for market differentiation, customer trust, or contractual demands. BSI notes its use for IT services, facilities, and business services, with a 50% year-over-year global certificate increase per ISO surveys.

Does **ISO 20000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 20000 requires third-party certification through accredited bodies for formal conformity claims.** This involves a **Stage 1 audit** (readiness review of scope, policy, and planning) and **Stage 2 audit** (evidence of implementation and effectiveness), followed by annual surveillance audits and triennial recertification. Internal audits (Clause 9) are mandatory for ongoing evaluation, but external certification by bodies like BSI or Schellman provides verifiable assurance of SMS Clauses 4–10 compliance.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 20000** be performed?

**ISO 20000 requires internal audits at planned intervals and management reviews at defined cadences to evaluate SMS performance.** Clause 9 mandates ongoing monitoring, measurement, analysis, and internal audits; surveillance audits occur annually post-certification, with full recertification every three years. PDCA drives continual reassessment, triggered by changes in context (Clause 4), risks (Clause 6), or nonconformities (Clause 10).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 20000**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 20000 results in certification denial, suspension, or withdrawal by accredited bodies.** Operationally, it risks service failures, SLA breaches, supplier issues, and lost market trust (e.g., BSI reports 69% cite trust gains from compliance). No direct legal penalties exist, but it amplifies contractual, reputational, and regulatory exposures in service-dependent sectors.

Can **ISO 20000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 20000-1:2018 maps seamlessly to frameworks via its Annex SL structure.** Clause alignments enable integration with management systems, with BSI noting compatibility for unified governance. Operational mappings support methods like ITIL (e.g., incident/problem to Clause 8.5), DevOps, Agile, Lean, SIAM, and VeriSM while proving auditable outcomes.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 20000**?

**The first step to implement ISO 20000 is determining the context of the organization and defining SMS scope (Clause 4).** Identify internal/external issues, interested parties, and boundaries via gap analysis against Clauses 4–10, producing a precise scope statement (e.g., services, customers, locations) and service management plan (Clause 6) with risk-based objectives.

LGPD vs ISO 20000

Standards Comparison

LGPD

Mandatory

2020

Brazil's comprehensive personal data protection regulation

ISO 20000

Voluntary

2018

International standard for service management systems

Quick Verdict

LGPD mandates data protection for Brazilian residents with fines up to 2% revenue, while ISO 20000 is voluntary certification for service management excellence. Companies adopt LGPD for legal compliance, ISO 20000 for operational reliability and market trust.

Data Privacy

LGPD

Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (Law No. 13.709/2018)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Extraterritorial scope targeting Brazilian residents' data processing
Ten core principles including prevention and non-discrimination
Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue capped at R$50M
Mandatory DPO appointment for controllers with disclosure
3-business-day breach notifications to ANPD and subjects

IT Service Management

ISO 20000

ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 Service management system requirements

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Annex SL structure for integrated management systems
End-to-end service lifecycle processes in Clause 8
PDCA-driven continual improvement requirements
Certifiable SMS with leadership accountability
Multi-supplier and risk-based service assurance

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

LGPD Details

What It Is

Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD), Law No. 13.709/2018, is Brazil's landmark comprehensive data protection regulation. Enacted in 2018 with full enforcement since 2021, it safeguards personal data of natural persons via extraterritorial scope, applying to processing in Brazil, targeting residents, or collected there. Adopts a risk-based approach with accountability, mirroring GDPR but tailored to Brazilian rights.

Key Components

**10 core principlespurpose limitation, necessity, transparency, security, prevention, non-discrimination, accountability.
**Data subject rightsaccess, correction, deletion, portability, anonymization, objection to automated decisions.
**10 legal basesconsent, contracts, legitimate interests, sensitive data restrictions.
**Governance toolsmandatory DPO for controllers, Records of Processing Activities (RoPAs), DPIAs for high-risk, ANPD enforcement with graduated sanctions.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for entities processing Brazilian data to avoid fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue (R$50M cap), suspensions, reputational harm. Drives trust, market access in $2T digital economy, innovation via anonymization exemptions, GDPR synergies for multinationals.

Implementation Overview

**Phased risk-based methodologygovernance/DPO appointment, data mapping/RoPAs, policies/contracts/SCCs, technical controls/training/DSRs, breach response, monitoring/audits. Applies universally across sizes/industries/geographies; ANPD audits, no formal certification.

ISO 20000 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 is the international certifiable standard for establishing, implementing, and improving a service management system (SMS). It focuses on managing the full service lifecycle—planning, design, transition, delivery, and improvement—to ensure consistent service quality. Built on Annex SL high-level structure and PDCA cycle, it aligns with other ISO standards like ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 27001.

Key Components

Clauses 4–10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement.
Clause 8 details operational domains: service portfolio, relationships, supply/demand, design/transition, resolution/fulfilment, assurance.
Core processes include incident/problem management, change/release, configuration/asset, availability/continuity, security.
Certifiable via accredited bodies with Stage 1/2 audits, surveillance, recertification.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives reliability, risk reduction, customer trust (e.g., 69% report inspired trust).
Enables market differentiation, integration with ITIL/DevOps.
Supports compliance, governance in IT/cloud/services.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, design, deploy, audit, certify (12-18 months typical).
Applies to all sizes/industries; requires leadership, training, tools.
Evidence-based audits ensure ongoing PDCA improvement.

Key Differences

Aspect	LGPD	ISO 20000
Scope	Personal data protection and processing	Service management systems (SMS) lifecycle
Industry	All sectors processing Brazilian data	Service providers, IT, all industries
Nature	Mandatory national data protection law	Voluntary certifiable management standard
Testing	DPIAs for high-risk, ANPD audits	Internal audits, Stage 1/2 certification audits
Penalties	Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue (R$50M)	Loss of certification, no legal fines

Scope

LGPD

Personal data protection and processing

ISO 20000

Service management systems (SMS) lifecycle

Industry

LGPD

All sectors processing Brazilian data

ISO 20000

Service providers, IT, all industries

Nature

LGPD

Mandatory national data protection law

ISO 20000

Voluntary certifiable management standard

Testing

LGPD

DPIAs for high-risk, ANPD audits

ISO 20000

Internal audits, Stage 1/2 certification audits

Penalties

LGPD

Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue (R$50M)

ISO 20000

Loss of certification, no legal fines

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about LGPD and ISO 20000

LGPD FAQ

ISO 20000 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability

Transform your SOC into a service provider using maturity assessments to standardize workflows, guarantee SLOs, and ensure predictability amid turnover and risi

CMMC Level 2 Implementation Guide for Small DIB Contractors: First 5 Steps to C3PAO Certification with Infographic

Actionable CMMC Level 2 guide for small DIB contractors: 5-step roadmap to C3PAO certification with infographic on timelines, costs & POA&Ms. Achieve DoD compli

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs J-SOX

Compare CSL vs J-SOX: China's data localization & CII security vs Japan's ICFR rigor. Master compliance risks, strategies & pitfalls for MNC success now!

ISO 27001 vs J-SOX

ISO 27001 vs J-SOX: Compare global ISMS standard with Japan's ICFR rules. Uncover key differences, compliance strategies & risk benefits—expert guide inside!

WCAG vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Discover WCAG vs MLPS 2.0: Global accessibility standards meet China's cybersecurity scheme. Master compliance strategies for web, data & risk mgmt. Dive in now!

LGPD

ISO 20000

Quick Verdict

LGPD

Key Features

ISO 20000

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

LGPD Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 20000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

LGPD FAQ

What is the primary objective of LGPD?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with LGPD?

Does LGPD require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for LGPD be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with LGPD?

Can LGPD be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing LGPD?

ISO 20000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 20000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 20000?

Does ISO 20000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 20000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 20000?

Can ISO 20000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 20000?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability

CMMC Level 2 Implementation Guide for Small DIB Contractors: First 5 Steps to C3PAO Certification with Infographic

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs J-SOX

ISO 27001 vs J-SOX

WCAG vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)