What is the primary objective of **LGPD**?

**The primary objective of LGPD (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, Law No. 13.709/2018) is to protect the fundamental rights of privacy and freedom of natural persons by regulating personal data processing.** Enacted August 14, 2018, it unifies fragmented norms, enforces 10 core principles (e.g., purpose limitation, necessity, accountability per Art. 6), and grants data subjects rights like access, deletion, and portability (Art. 18), balancing innovation with safeguards via ANPD oversight.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **LGPD**?

**All controllers and processors handling personal data of Brazilian residents must comply with LGPD, regardless of company size or location.** Its extraterritorial scope (Art. 3) applies to any processing in Brazil, targeting residents for goods/services, or data collected there, affecting public/private entities in sectors like e-commerce, fintech, and healthcare; no employee/revenue thresholds exempt micro/small firms.

Does **LGPD** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**LGPD does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** ANPD conducts audits (Arts. 55-56), but organizations must maintain Records of Processing Activities (RoPAs, Art. 37), perform DPIAs for high-risk processing (Art. 38), and demonstrate accountability via internal governance; voluntary certifications like ISO 27701 enhance maturity but are not required.

How often should an assessment for **LGPD** be performed?

**LGPD assessments, including RoPAs and DPIAs, must be maintained continuously with regular reviews, such as quarterly internal audits and annually for high-risk activities.** ANPD guidance (e.g., CD/ANPD No. 02/2022) supports simplified records for small entities, but ongoing monitoring of data flows, incidents, and transfers ensures alignment with 10 principles (Art. 6).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **LGPD**?

**Non-compliance with LGPD triggers graduated ANPD sanctions, including fines up to 2% of Brazilian revenue (capped at R$50 million per infraction), data processing suspension up to 6 months, and public disclosure (Art. 52).** Additional risks include civil damages claims (Art. 42), operational halts, and reputational harm, with factors like cooperation mitigating severity.

Can **LGPD** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, LGPD maps closely to other international frameworks due to shared principles like purpose limitation, minimization, and data subject rights.** Its 10 principles (Art. 6) and bases (Art. 7) align with global regimes, enabling hybrid programs, though ANPD-specific rules (e.g., SCCs per Resolution 19/2024) require tailored adaptations for transfers and enforcement.

What is the first step to begin implementing **LGPD**?

**The first step to implement LGPD is appointing a Data Protection Officer (DPO) and conducting data mapping to create a Record of Processing Activities (RoPA).** Per Art. 41, publish DPO details; inventory data flows, legal bases (Art. 7), and high-risk activities to enforce principles (Art. 6) and prioritize remediation.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 56002**?

**ISO 56002 provides guidance for organizations to establish, implement, maintain, and continually improve an innovation management system (IMS).** The standard reframes innovation as a managed capability for value realization through a **High-Level Structure (HLS)** framework (Clauses 4–10) aligned with **PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act)**, applicable to all organization types, sizes, sectors, and innovation approaches (product, service, process, model, method; incremental to radical). It emphasizes leadership commitment, portfolio governance, uncertainty management, and evidence-based evaluation without prescribing tools or methods.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 56002**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 56002, as it is a voluntary guidance standard.** It is professionally relevant for **established organizations** seeking sustained innovation capability, including executives, C-suite leaders, R&D heads, and compliance officers aiming to integrate IMS with governance. Start-ups and temporary entities may adopt elements partially; policymakers and consultants use it for capability programs.

Does **ISO 56002** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 56002 does not require external audits or third-party certification, being guidance rather than a requirements standard.** Organizations conduct internal audits (Clause 9) and management reviews for IMS effectiveness; external assurance is optional via conformity assessments against defined criteria, often preparing for ISO 56001 certification where applicable.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 56002** be performed?

**ISO 56002 requires regular performance evaluations through monitoring, measurement, internal audits, and management reviews, with frequency determined by organizational context.** Clause 9 mandates evidence-based assessments (KPIs, tools, responsibilities); practical cadences include annual audits, quarterly portfolio reviews, and ongoing KPI tracking to support continual improvement (Clause 10).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 56002**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 56002 carries no legal penalties, as it imposes no mandatory requirements.** Business risks include resource waste on "zombie projects," stalled innovation portfolios, strategic obsolescence, and lost stakeholder confidence; benefits of alignment—improved governance, ROI, and competitiveness—are forfeited.

Can **ISO 56002** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 56002 maps seamlessly to other frameworks via its High-Level Structure (HLS) and Harmonized Structure (HS) alignment.** Clauses 4–10 enable integration with management systems sharing PDCA logic, reducing duplication in leadership reviews, audits, and documentation while tailoring innovation governance to organizational strategy.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 56002**?

**The first step is building awareness and conducting a gap analysis against ISO 56002 clauses (4–10).** Educate stakeholders on IMS benefits, assess current practices (context, leadership, processes), and prioritize via diagnostics to define scope, policy, and objectives, initiating the staged PDCA-aligned roadmap.

LGPD vs ISO 56002

Standards Comparison

LGPD

Mandatory

2020

Brazil's comprehensive regulation for personal data protection

ISO 56002

Voluntary

2019

International guidance for innovation management systems

Quick Verdict

LGPD mandates data protection for Brazilian residents with fines up to 2% revenue, while ISO 56002 voluntarily guides innovation systems for value creation. Companies adopt LGPD for legal compliance; ISO 56002 for strategic innovation governance and competitive advantage.

Data Privacy

LGPD

Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (Law 13.709/2018)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Extraterritorial scope targets Brazilian residents' data processing
10 core principles include prevention and non-discrimination
Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue capped at R$50M
Mandatory DPO for controllers with public disclosure
3-business-day breach notifications to ANPD and subjects

Innovation Management

ISO 56002

ISO 56002:2019 Innovation management system — Guidance

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

PDCA cycle aligned with HLS for IMS
Leadership commitment and innovation policy
Portfolio management and uncertainty handling
Performance evaluation via KPIs and audits
Integration with other ISO management systems

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

LGPD Details

What It Is

LGPD (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, Law No. 13.709/2018) is Brazil's comprehensive data protection regulation. Enacted in 2018 and fully enforced since 2021, it protects personal data of natural persons with extraterritorial scope applying to any processing targeting Brazilian residents. It adopts a risk-based approach anchored in 10 core principles like purpose limitation, necessity, transparency, security, prevention, non-discrimination, and accountability.

Key Components

10 principles governing all processing activities
**Data subject rightsaccess, correction, deletion, portability, anonymization, objection to automated decisions
10 legal bases for processing (e.g., consent, legitimate interests, credit protection)
Security and DPIAs for high-risk activities; breach notifications within 3 business days
ANPD enforcement with graduated sanctions; no formal certification but mandatory records and DPO

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for entities processing Brazilian data, avoiding fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue (R$50M cap), operational suspensions, and reputational harm. Benefits include trust-building, market access in Brazil's digital economy, risk reduction for breaches/cyber threats, and synergies with GDPR for multinationals.

Implementation Overview

Phased risk-based methodology: governance/DPO appointment, data mapping/RoPA, policies/contracts/SCCs, technical controls/training, monitoring/audits. Applies to all sizes/industries/geographies handling Brazilian data; ANPD audits enforce compliance.

ISO 56002 Details

What It Is

ISO 56002:2019, titled Innovation management — Innovation management system — Guidance, is an international standard providing a framework for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an Innovation Management System (IMS). It uses a PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle and High-Level Structure (HLS) aligned with other ISO management standards, applicable to all organization types, sizes, and sectors.

Key Components

Seven core clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
Eight principles: value realization, future-focused leadership, strategic direction, culture, portfolio thinking, uncertainty management, learning, stakeholder engagement.
Guidance-based, non-prescriptive; no fixed controls, emphasizes tailoring.
Conformity via self-assessment or third-party audits, not formal certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives strategic innovation capability and value creation.
Improves governance, reduces 'innovation theater' and resource waste.
Enhances competitiveness, risk management, partnerships.
Builds stakeholder confidence; voluntary but boosts reputation.

Implementation Overview

Phased: awareness, gap analysis, design, pilot, scale, sustain.
Involves leadership policy, processes, KPIs, audits.
Suited for established organizations; scalable for SMEs.
No mandatory certification; optional external assurance.

Key Differences

Aspect	LGPD	ISO 56002
Scope	Personal data protection and processing	Innovation management systems guidance
Industry	All sectors processing Brazilian data	All sectors pursuing innovation activities
Nature	Mandatory national regulation with ANPD enforcement	Voluntary international guidance standard
Testing	DPIAs for high-risk, ANPD audits	Internal audits, management reviews, maturity assessments
Penalties	Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue (R$50M cap)	No legal penalties, potential certification loss

Scope

LGPD

Personal data protection and processing

ISO 56002

Innovation management systems guidance

Industry

LGPD

All sectors processing Brazilian data

ISO 56002

All sectors pursuing innovation activities

Nature

LGPD

Mandatory national regulation with ANPD enforcement

ISO 56002

Voluntary international guidance standard

Testing

LGPD

DPIAs for high-risk, ANPD audits

ISO 56002

Internal audits, management reviews, maturity assessments

Penalties

LGPD

Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue (R$50M cap)

ISO 56002

No legal penalties, potential certification loss

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about LGPD and ISO 56002

LGPD FAQ

ISO 56002 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 Private Sector Tailoring Blueprint: First 5 Steps to Overlay-Driven Compliance with Infographic

Step-by-step blueprint for private sector NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 tailoring using overlays for AI & supply chain risks. Infographic + first 5 steps for ROI-drive

NIST 800-53 Private Sector ROI Uncovered: 2025 Podcast Deep Dive into Control Family Impact on $10M+ Breach Aversions

Uncover NIST 800-53 ROI in healthcare & finance: RA, SI, IR controls break even after 1-2 incidents ($100K-$10M savings). Podcast deep dive with CISO metrics fo

TISAX Tabletop Exercises for ADAS Suppliers: Simulating Prototype IP Leaks and Ransomware in Hybrid Supply Chains (2025 Edition with Hero Scenario Visual)

Master TISAX 'Very High' tabletop exercises for ADAS suppliers with 2024 breach simulations like CAD leaks and ransomware. Get scripts, AAR templates, hybrid ti

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

GDPR vs NIST 800-171

Compare GDPR vs NIST 800-171: EU privacy law's rights & fines meet US CUI controls. Key differences, compliance strategies for global ops. Secure data now!

NIS2 vs EU AI Act

Discover NIS2 vs EU AI Act: NIS2 expands cyber scope, mandates 24/72hr reports & 2% fines; AI Act bans high-risk AI, phases GPAI rules. Compare & comply now!

RoHS vs LEED

Compare RoHS vs LEED: RoHS curbs 10 toxins in electronics for EU compliance; LEED rates green buildings via credits. Key diffs, tips & strategies for sustainability. Explore now!

LGPD

ISO 56002

Quick Verdict

LGPD

Key Features

ISO 56002

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

LGPD Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 56002 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

LGPD FAQ

What is the primary objective of LGPD?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with LGPD?

Does LGPD require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for LGPD be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with LGPD?

Can LGPD be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing LGPD?

ISO 56002 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 56002?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 56002?

Does ISO 56002 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 56002 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 56002?

Can ISO 56002 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 56002?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 Private Sector Tailoring Blueprint: First 5 Steps to Overlay-Driven Compliance with Infographic

NIST 800-53 Private Sector ROI Uncovered: 2025 Podcast Deep Dive into Control Family Impact on $10M+ Breach Aversions

TISAX Tabletop Exercises for ADAS Suppliers: Simulating Prototype IP Leaks and Ransomware in Hybrid Supply Chains (2025 Edition with Hero Scenario Visual)

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

GDPR vs NIST 800-171

NIS2 vs EU AI Act

RoHS vs LEED