Standards Comparison

    MAS TRM

    Mandatory
    2021

    Singapore guidelines for financial technology risk management

    VS

    SAMA CSF

    Mandatory
    2017

    Saudi framework for financial sector cybersecurity maturity.

    Quick Verdict

    MAS TRM offers principles-based tech risk guidance for Singapore FIs, emphasizing proportionality and governance. SAMA CSF mandates maturity-tiered cybersecurity for Saudi finance, with structured controls and audits. FIs adopt them for regulatory compliance and resilience.

    Technology Risk Management

    MAS TRM

    MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines 2021

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board and senior management ultimate accountability for oversight
    • Proportional controls based on risk profile and criticality
    • Third-party risk management beyond formal outsourcing
    • Defence-in-depth for cyber resilience and CIA triad
    • Annual penetration testing for internet-facing systems
    Cybersecurity

    SAMA CSF

    SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Six-level maturity model mandating Level 3 minimum
    • Board-level accountability with independent CISO
    • Four domains covering governance to third-party risks
    • Principle-based with compensating controls and waivers
    • Aligned to NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS standards

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    MAS TRM Details

    What It Is

    MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (January 2021) are supervisory guidelines issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore for financial institutions. They provide principles-based guidance on technology and cyber risk governance, controls, and resilience. The primary purpose is to promote sound practices ensuring confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of systems and data, with proportional implementation based on risk profile and complexity.

    Key Components

    • 15 main sections covering governance, risk frameworks, secure development, IT service management, resilience, access controls, cryptography, data security, cyber operations, assessments, and audit.
    • Synthesised 12 core principles including board accountability, asset inventories, third-party oversight, and layered defences.
    • No fixed control count; emphasises outcomes via defence-in-depth and continuous improvement.
    • Compliance model relies on supervisory review, not formal certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Financial institutions adopt MAS TRM for regulatory alignment, as MAS considers observance in supervision. It mitigates cyber threats, enhances resilience, and supports digital transformation. Benefits include reduced incident impact, board assurance, and stakeholder trust amid rising threats.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased approach: governance setup, asset inventory, risk assessment, control deployment, testing, third-party management.
    • Applies to all MAS-supervised FIs, scaled by size/complexity.
    • Requires internal audit; no mandatory external certification but evidence for supervision.

    SAMA CSF Details

    What It Is

    SAMA Cyber Security Framework (SAMA CSF) Version 1.0 is a mandatory regulatory framework issued by the Saudi Central Bank in 2017. It establishes principle-based, risk-driven cybersecurity requirements for financial institutions, focusing on governance, risk management, operations, and third-party security to ensure resilience against cyber threats.

    Key Components

    • Four core domains: Leadership & Governance, Risk Management & Compliance, Operations & Technology, Third-Party Security.
    • Over 100 sub-controls organized into principles, objectives, and control considerations.
    • Six-level maturity model (Level 0-5), mandating at least Level 3 (structured policies, standards, procedures monitored via KPIs).
    • Aligned with NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and Basel; self-assessment and SAMA audits for compliance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for SAMA-regulated entities (banks, insurers, fintechs) to avoid fines, license risks.
    • Enhances cyber resilience, reduces breach impacts, supports Vision 2030 digital goals.
    • Builds board-level accountability, stakeholder trust, competitive edge in Saudi finance.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased roadmap: gap analysis, governance setup, control deployment, continuous monitoring.
    • Applies to all Saudi financial institutions; involves documentation pyramid, training, audits.
    • No external certification; relies on periodic self-assessments and SAMA reviews. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    MAS TRM
    Technology risk governance, cyber controls, third-party, resilience across full lifecycle
    SAMA CSF
    Cybersecurity leadership, risk mgmt, operations, third-party with maturity model

    Industry

    MAS TRM
    Singapore financial institutions (banks, insurers, FIs)
    SAMA CSF
    Saudi financial sector (banks, insurers, financing, credit bureaus)

    Nature

    MAS TRM
    Supervisory guidelines, principles-based, proportional
    SAMA CSF
    Mandatory framework with maturity levels, principle-based

    Testing

    MAS TRM
    Annual PT for internet systems, DR tests, vuln assessments
    SAMA CSF
    Periodic self-assessments, audits, pen tests for internet services

    Penalties

    MAS TRM
    Supervisory actions, fines implied via observance
    SAMA CSF
    Enforcement via audits, fines, license risks not specified

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about MAS TRM and SAMA CSF

    MAS TRM FAQ

    SAMA CSF FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages