MAS TRM
Singapore guidelines for financial technology risk management
SAMA CSF
Saudi framework for financial sector cybersecurity maturity.
Quick Verdict
MAS TRM offers principles-based tech risk guidance for Singapore FIs, emphasizing proportionality and governance. SAMA CSF mandates maturity-tiered cybersecurity for Saudi finance, with structured controls and audits. FIs adopt them for regulatory compliance and resilience.
MAS TRM
MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines 2021
Key Features
- Board and senior management ultimate accountability for oversight
- Proportional controls based on risk profile and criticality
- Third-party risk management beyond formal outsourcing
- Defence-in-depth for cyber resilience and CIA triad
- Annual penetration testing for internet-facing systems
SAMA CSF
SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0
Key Features
- Six-level maturity model mandating Level 3 minimum
- Board-level accountability with independent CISO
- Four domains covering governance to third-party risks
- Principle-based with compensating controls and waivers
- Aligned to NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS standards
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
MAS TRM Details
What It Is
MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (January 2021) are supervisory guidelines issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore for financial institutions. They provide principles-based guidance on technology and cyber risk governance, controls, and resilience. The primary purpose is to promote sound practices ensuring confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of systems and data, with proportional implementation based on risk profile and complexity.
Key Components
- 15 main sections covering governance, risk frameworks, secure development, IT service management, resilience, access controls, cryptography, data security, cyber operations, assessments, and audit.
- Synthesised 12 core principles including board accountability, asset inventories, third-party oversight, and layered defences.
- No fixed control count; emphasises outcomes via defence-in-depth and continuous improvement.
- Compliance model relies on supervisory review, not formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Financial institutions adopt MAS TRM for regulatory alignment, as MAS considers observance in supervision. It mitigates cyber threats, enhances resilience, and supports digital transformation. Benefits include reduced incident impact, board assurance, and stakeholder trust amid rising threats.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: governance setup, asset inventory, risk assessment, control deployment, testing, third-party management.
- Applies to all MAS-supervised FIs, scaled by size/complexity.
- Requires internal audit; no mandatory external certification but evidence for supervision.
SAMA CSF Details
What It Is
SAMA Cyber Security Framework (SAMA CSF) Version 1.0 is a mandatory regulatory framework issued by the Saudi Central Bank in 2017. It establishes principle-based, risk-driven cybersecurity requirements for financial institutions, focusing on governance, risk management, operations, and third-party security to ensure resilience against cyber threats.
Key Components
- Four core domains: Leadership & Governance, Risk Management & Compliance, Operations & Technology, Third-Party Security.
- Over 100 sub-controls organized into principles, objectives, and control considerations.
- Six-level maturity model (Level 0-5), mandating at least Level 3 (structured policies, standards, procedures monitored via KPIs).
- Aligned with NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and Basel; self-assessment and SAMA audits for compliance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for SAMA-regulated entities (banks, insurers, fintechs) to avoid fines, license risks.
- Enhances cyber resilience, reduces breach impacts, supports Vision 2030 digital goals.
- Builds board-level accountability, stakeholder trust, competitive edge in Saudi finance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: gap analysis, governance setup, control deployment, continuous monitoring.
- Applies to all Saudi financial institutions; involves documentation pyramid, training, audits.
- No external certification; relies on periodic self-assessments and SAMA reviews. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | MAS TRM | SAMA CSF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Technology risk governance, cyber controls, third-party, resilience across full lifecycle | Cybersecurity leadership, risk mgmt, operations, third-party with maturity model |
| Industry | Singapore financial institutions (banks, insurers, FIs) | Saudi financial sector (banks, insurers, financing, credit bureaus) |
| Nature | Supervisory guidelines, principles-based, proportional | Mandatory framework with maturity levels, principle-based |
| Testing | Annual PT for internet systems, DR tests, vuln assessments | Periodic self-assessments, audits, pen tests for internet services |
| Penalties | Supervisory actions, fines implied via observance | Enforcement via audits, fines, license risks not specified |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about MAS TRM and SAMA CSF
MAS TRM FAQ
SAMA CSF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Implementation Guide: Mastering Form 8-K Item 1.05 Materiality Determination and 4-Business-Day Reporting Workflow
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 compliance with step-by-step materiality assessment, incident workflows & Inline XBRL tagging. Beat the 4-business-day clock. Esse

Top 5 Audit Survival Secrets for Your First SOC 2 Type 2: What Auditors Really Check (and How to Pass)
Master your first SOC 2 Type 2 audit with proven strategies: 40-sample testing, vendor gaps, CPA walkthroughs. Get checklists, scripts & tips from SignWell to s
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FISMA vs J-SOX
Compare FISMA vs J-SOX: Decode U.S. federal cybersecurity mandates against Japan's ICFR rules. Gain strategies, pitfalls, and implementation insights for compliance success.
HIPAA vs WEEE
Compare HIPAA vs WEEE: Master U.S. health data privacy rules & EU e-waste regs. Uncover compliance risks, strategies & best practices for global ops. Dive in now!
CAA vs ISO 28000
Explore CAA vs ISO 28000: U.S. air quality mandates meet global supply chain security. Master key differences for compliant, resilient operations today!