GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 30301
    Standards Comparison

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 30301

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Mandatory
    N/A

    China's mandatory graded cybersecurity protection regime

    VS

    ISO 30301

    Voluntary
    2019

    International standard for management systems for records

    Quick Verdict

    MLPS 2.0 mandates graded cybersecurity for China networks via PSB enforcement, while ISO 30301 offers voluntary records governance certification globally. China operators comply with MLPS legally; others adopt ISO for auditable evidence and efficiency.

    Standard

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Five-level impact-based system classification
    • Mandatory registration and PSB approval for Level 2+
    • Law enforcement-led enforcement by Public Security Bureaus
    • Graded technical and governance controls by level
    • Third-party audits scoring 70/100 minimum for certification
    Records Management

    ISO 30301

    ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records Requirements

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • High-Level Structure alignment with other MSS
    • Normative Annex A records operational controls
    • Explicit records requirements identification (4.1.2)
    • Flexible conformity pathways including certification
    • Top management accountability and risk-based planning

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

    What It Is

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's legally mandated cybersecurity framework under the 2017 Cybersecurity Law (Article 21). It requires all network operators to classify systems into five protection levels based on potential harm to national security, social order, and public interests, implementing graded technical, governance, and physical controls.

    Key Components

    • Core domains: physical security, network protection, data security, access control, monitoring, personnel management.
    • Standards: GB/T 22239-2019 (baseline), GB/T 25070-2019 (technical), GB/T 28448-2019 (evaluation).
    • Common controls for all levels plus extended for cloud, IoT, big data.
    • Compliance via self-classification, third-party audits (70/100 score), PSB approval for Level 2+.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for China operations to avoid fines, suspensions, inspections.
    • Enhances resilience, aligns with data laws (DSL, PIPL).
    • Builds regulator trust, enables market access, reduces breach risks.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: scoping, classification, gap analysis, remediation, audits, ongoing re-evaluations. Applies to all sizes in China; Level 3+ needs annual audits, local expertise.

    ISO 30301 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 30301:2019 (Information and documentation — Management systems for records — Requirements) is an international, certifiable standard for establishing, implementing, and improving a Management System for Records (MSR). It ensures reliable, authoritative evidence of business activities via a risk-based, High-Level Structure (HLS) approach applicable to any organization.

    Key Components

    • **Clauses 4–10Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
    • **Clause 8 & Annex A (normative)Records lifecycle controls (creation, capture, access, retention, disposition).
    • Principles: Authenticity, reliability, integrity, usability.
    • Conformity models: Self-declaration, external confirmation, third-party certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets legal/regulatory records obligations.
    • Mitigates risks like evidence loss or noncompliance.
    • Boosts efficiency, auditability, and stakeholder trust.
    • Integrates with ISO 9001, 27001 for unified governance.
    • Enhances decision traceability and continuity.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased rollout: Gap analysis, policy/roles design, operational controls, audits. Scalable for all sizes/industries; certification via accredited bodies optional.

    Key Differences

    AspectMLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)ISO 30301
    ScopeGraded cybersecurity for networks/systemsRecords management lifecycle governance
    IndustryAll network operators in mainland ChinaAny organization worldwide
    NatureMandatory legal regime, PSB enforcementVoluntary certifiable management standard
    TestingThird-party audits, PSB approval, periodic re-evalsInternal audits, optional third-party certification
    PenaltiesFines, operations suspension, license risksNo legal penalties, certification loss only

    Scope

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Graded cybersecurity for networks/systems
    ISO 30301
    Records management lifecycle governance

    Industry

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    All network operators in mainland China
    ISO 30301
    Any organization worldwide

    Nature

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Mandatory legal regime, PSB enforcement
    ISO 30301
    Voluntary certifiable management standard

    Testing

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Third-party audits, PSB approval, periodic re-evals
    ISO 30301
    Internal audits, optional third-party certification

    Penalties

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Fines, operations suspension, license risks
    ISO 30301
    No legal penalties, certification loss only

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) and ISO 30301

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ

    ISO 30301 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

    The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

    Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

    Why applying the NIST CSF Standard is a Life-Saver!

    Why applying the NIST CSF Standard is a Life-Saver!

    Discover why NIST CSF 2.0 is a life-saver for organizations. This flexible framework's 6 functions—Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover—boost res

    CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)

    CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)

    Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) and ISO 30301 compare against other standards

    Other MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Comparisons

    • TISAX vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • DORA vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • PCI DSS vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 27018

    Other ISO 30301 Comparisons

    • PMBOK vs ISO 30301
    • ISO 41001 vs ISO 30301
    • ISO 56002 vs ISO 30301
    • C-TPAT vs ISO 30301
    • ISO 17025 vs ISO 30301
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved