MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 30301
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
China's mandatory graded cybersecurity protection regime
ISO 30301
International standard for management systems for records
Quick Verdict
MLPS 2.0 mandates graded cybersecurity for China networks via PSB enforcement, while ISO 30301 offers voluntary records governance certification globally. China operators comply with MLPS legally; others adopt ISO for auditable evidence and efficiency.
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0
Key Features
- Five-level impact-based system classification
- Mandatory registration and PSB approval for Level 2+
- Law enforcement-led enforcement by Public Security Bureaus
- Graded technical and governance controls by level
- Third-party audits scoring 75/100 minimum for certification
ISO 30301
ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records Requirements
Key Features
- High-Level Structure alignment with other MSS
- Normative Annex A records operational controls
- Explicit records requirements identification (4.1.2)
- Flexible conformity pathways including certification
- Top management accountability and risk-based planning
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details
What It Is
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's legally mandated cybersecurity framework under the 2017 Cybersecurity Law (Article 21). It requires all network operators to classify systems into five protection levels based on potential harm to national security, social order, and public interests, implementing graded technical, governance, and physical controls.
Key Components
- Core domains: physical security, network protection, data security, access control, monitoring, personnel management.
- Standards: GB/T 22239-2019 (baseline), GB/T 25070-2019 (technical), GB/T 28448-2019 (evaluation).
- Common controls for all levels plus extended for cloud, IoT, big data.
- Compliance via self-classification, third-party audits (75/100 score), PSB approval for Level 2+.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for China operations to avoid fines, suspensions, inspections.
- Enhances resilience, aligns with data laws (DSL, PIPL).
- Builds regulator trust, enables market access, reduces breach risks.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping, classification, gap analysis, remediation, audits, ongoing re-evaluations. Applies to all sizes in China; Level 3+ needs annual audits, local expertise.
ISO 30301 Details
What It Is
ISO 30301:2019 (Information and documentation — Management systems for records — Requirements) is an international, certifiable standard for establishing, implementing, and improving a Management System for Records (MSR). It ensures reliable, authoritative evidence of business activities via a risk-based, High-Level Structure (HLS) approach applicable to any organization.
Key Components
- **Clauses 4–10Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- **Clause 8 & Annex A (normative)Records lifecycle controls (creation, capture, access, retention, disposition).
- Principles: Authenticity, reliability, integrity, usability.
- Conformity models: Self-declaration, external confirmation, third-party certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets legal/regulatory records obligations.
- Mitigates risks like evidence loss or noncompliance.
- Boosts efficiency, auditability, and stakeholder trust.
- Integrates with ISO 9001, 27001 for unified governance.
- Enhances decision traceability and continuity.
Implementation Overview
Phased rollout: Gap analysis, policy/roles design, operational controls, audits. Scalable for all sizes/industries; certification via accredited bodies optional.
Key Differences
| Aspect | MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) | ISO 30301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Graded cybersecurity for networks/systems | Records management lifecycle governance |
| Industry | All network operators in mainland China | Any organization worldwide |
| Nature | Mandatory legal regime, PSB enforcement | Voluntary certifiable management standard |
| Testing | Third-party audits, PSB approval, periodic re-evals | Internal audits, optional third-party certification |
| Penalties | Fines, operations suspension, license risks | No legal penalties, certification loss only |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) and ISO 30301
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ
ISO 30301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365
Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

The SOC Maturity Roadmap: A 5-Step Blueprint for Scaling from Ad-Hoc to Optimized Operations
Unlock SOC excellence with our 5-step maturity roadmap. Compare SOC-CMM, NIST CSF, and CMMC frameworks to scale from ad-hoc to automated operations. Start your

What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?
Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Explore More Comparisons
See how MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) and ISO 30301 compare against other standards