NIS2
EU directive strengthening cybersecurity for essential entities
ISO 14064
International standard for GHG quantification, reporting, and verification.
Quick Verdict
NIS2 mandates cybersecurity resilience for EU critical sectors via risk management and rapid incident reporting, while ISO 14064 provides voluntary GHG accounting standards for global organizations. Companies adopt NIS2 for regulatory compliance to avoid fines; ISO 14064 for credible emissions reporting and stakeholder trust.
NIS2
Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2)
Key Features
- Expands scope via size-cap rule to medium/large entities
- Mandates strict multi-stage incident reporting timelines
- Enforces direct senior management accountability
- Imposes fines up to 2% global annual turnover
- Requires continuous risk and supply chain management
ISO 14064
ISO 14064: Greenhouse gases quantification and reporting
Key Features
- Three-part modular structure for inventories, projects, verification
- Five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
- Scopes 1-3 emissions boundaries and quantification methods
- Risk-based independent validation and verification processes
- Alignment with GHG Protocol for global interoperability
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIS2 Details
What It Is
NIS2, officially Directive (EU) 2022/2555, is an EU regulation expanding the original NIS Directive. It targets essential and important entities in broadened sectors like energy, transport, and digital services. Primary purpose: achieve a high common level of cybersecurity resilience. Employs a risk-based, all-hazards approach with continuous assurance.
Key Components
- Four pillars: risk management, corporate accountability, incident reporting, business continuity.
- Strict reporting: 24-hour early warning, 72-hour notification, one-month final report.
- Expanded scope via size-cap rule (50+ employees or €10M turnover).
- Leverages standards like ISO 27001; enforced by national CSIRTs via spot checks, no formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory compliance avoids fines up to 2% global turnover.
- Enhances cyber resilience, protects critical infrastructure.
- Builds stakeholder trust, ensures business continuity.
- Provides competitive edge in EU markets amid rising threats.
Implementation Overview
- Gap analysis, risk assessments, governance setup.
- Develop reporting, supply chain security, training programs.
- Applies to medium/large EU entities in covered sectors.
- Ongoing: live audits, transposition by October 2024. (178 words)
ISO 14064 Details
What It Is
ISO 14064 is an international standard family (ISO 14064-1:2018, -2:2019, -3:2019) providing specifications and guidance for quantifying, reporting, and verifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and removals. It adopts a principle-based approach with five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy, applicable at organizational and project levels.
Key Components
- **Three partsPart 1 (organizational inventories), Part 2 (project reductions/removals), Part 3 (validation/verification).
- Scopes 1-3 emissions classification, boundary setting (equity/operational control).
- Built on GHG Protocol alignment; no fixed controls but structured workflows for data, quantification, assurance.
- Voluntary compliance with optional third-party verification under ISO 14065.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables regulatory compliance (e.g., CSRD, SB-253), investor trust, and carbon market access.
- Drives risk mitigation, operational efficiencies, and Scope 3 hotspot identification.
- Builds stakeholder credibility via assured, comparable GHG statements.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: governance, boundary design, data systems, verification (6-12 months typical).
- Suits all sizes/industries; complex for Scope 3-heavy firms. Requires audit trails, training; verification enhances credibility. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIS2 | ISO 14064 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity risk management, incident reporting for critical infrastructure | GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification for organizations/projects |
| Industry | Essential/important entities in EU sectors like energy, transport, digital | All sectors worldwide, heavy industry, energy, corporates |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation with national transposition | Voluntary international standard family for GHG accounting |
| Testing | Incident reporting, spot checks by national authorities | Third-party validation/verification under ISO 14064-3 |
| Penalties | Fines up to 2% global turnover or €10M | No legal penalties, loss of verification credibility |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIS2 and ISO 14064
NIS2 FAQ
ISO 14064 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers
Calculate realistic CMMC costs for Levels 1-3: self-assessments, C3PAO fees, tooling, remediation & ROI. Interactive tool for small DIB suppliers. Get benchmark
CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365
Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence
ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan
Debunk ISO 27701 2025 standalone certification myths vs ISO 27001. Get a 90-day PIMS launch roadmap, checklists & audit prep to certify faster amid global priva
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 45001 vs COBIT
Discover ISO 45001 vs COBIT: Compare OH&S leadership & risk controls with IT governance mastery. Integrate for seamless IMS, compliance & performance. Unlock insights now!
DORA vs ISO 20000
Decode DORA vs ISO 20000: EU finance ICT resilience mandate meets global ITSM cert standard. Key diffs in risk mgmt, testing, 3rd-party oversight. Align now!
TOGAF vs HITRUST CSF
Compare TOGAF vs HITRUST CSF: EA framework for strategy-IT alignment meets certifiable security controls. Boost compliance, reuse, and ROI. Discover the best fit now!