NIST CSF
Voluntary framework for managing cybersecurity risks organization-wide
ISO 13485
International standard for medical device quality management systems
Quick Verdict
NIST CSF offers voluntary cybersecurity risk management for all organizations, while ISO 13485 mandates certifiable QMS for medical device makers. Companies adopt NIST CSF for flexible cyber resilience and ISO 13485 for regulatory compliance and market access.
NIST CSF
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0
Key Features
- Introduces Govern function for overarching cybersecurity governance
- Enables Current and Target Profiles for gap analysis
- Defines four Implementation Tiers for maturity assessment
- Structures around six core cybersecurity Functions
- Provides mappings to standards like ISO 27001
ISO 13485
ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems
Key Features
- Risk-based QMS controls for device lifecycle
- Design development verification and validation
- Supplier evaluation and outsourcing management
- Post-market surveillance and complaint handling
- Process validation and traceability requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIST CSF Details
What It Is
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 is a voluntary, risk-based guideline from the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology. It offers organizations a flexible, adaptable approach to identify, assess, and manage cybersecurity risks, applicable to any size, sector, or maturity level. Its methodology prioritizes outcomes and continuous improvement over rigid controls.
Key Components
- **Six Core FunctionsGovern (new), Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover—covering the full cybersecurity lifecycle.
- **Categories and Subcategories22 categories, 112 subcategories with informative references to standards like ISO 27001 and NIST SP 800-53.
- **Implementation TiersFour levels (Partial, Risk-Informed, Repeatable, Adaptive) for evaluating risk management processes.
- **Framework ProfilesCurrent and Target profiles enable gap analysis and prioritization. No formal certification; relies on self-attestation.
Why Organizations Use It
- Fosters common language for board-level risk discussions.
- Demonstrates due care, supports compliance, and aids insurance premiums.
- Enhances supply chain oversight and strategic governance.
- Drives risk reduction, stakeholder trust, and competitive edge.
Implementation Overview
- Create Profiles and select Tiers aligned to business needs.
- Map activities, develop policies, train staff, monitor continuously.
- Scalable for SMEs to enterprises, globally applicable. Typical steps: assess current state, prioritize gaps, iterate improvements. (178 words)
ISO 13485 Details
What It Is
ISO 13485:2016, titled Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes, is a certifiable international standard for QMS in medical devices. It ensures organizations consistently meet customer and regulatory requirements across the device lifecycle using a risk-based process approach.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–8: QMS/documentation, management responsibility, resources, product realization, measurement/improvement.
- Focus: design controls, supplier management, process validation, traceability, post-market surveillance, CAPA.
- Built on ISO 9001 with regulatory enhancements; certification via accredited bodies (Stage 1/2 audits).
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables market access (EU MDR, FDA QMSR 2026).
- Mitigates risks, ensures patient safety, reduces quality costs.
- Builds supply chain trust, competitive differentiation.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, validation, internal audits.
- Applies globally to manufacturers/suppliers of all sizes.
- 9–18 months typical; requires executive commitment, eQMS tools.
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIST CSF | ISO 13485 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity risk management lifecycle | Medical device quality management lifecycle |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide, any size | Medical devices and suppliers globally |
| Nature | Voluntary risk framework, no certification | Certifiable QMS standard for regulations |
| Testing | Self-assessment via Profiles and Tiers | Third-party certification audits required |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, loss of posture | Certification loss, regulatory enforcement |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIST CSF and ISO 13485
NIST CSF FAQ
ISO 13485 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2
Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp
SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: 10 Red Flags Auditors Flag and Model Answers for Walkthroughs
Master SOC 2 Type 2 audits with our guide: 10 red flags like incomplete logs/vendor gaps, model walkthrough answers, psychology tips. Pass first-time with <5% e
ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Extending Your ISMS to PIMS in 12 Months or Less
Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS in 12 months with our phased roadmap. Templates, checklists & infographics for RoPA, DSARs & audit-ready privacy complia
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CAA vs FedRAMP
Discover CAA vs FedRAMP: Compare Clean Air Act standards with FedRAMP cloud authorization. Key insights for executives on compliance, risks, and strategies. Read now!
NIS2 vs OSHA
Discover NIS2 vs OSHA: EU cybersecurity directive meets US workplace safety regs. Unpack scopes, penalties, reporting—master compliance for global ops now!
SOC 2 vs FSSC 22000
Compare SOC 2 vs FSSC 22000: Tech security audits meet food safety certification. Discover differences, implementation tips, and strategic benefits for compliance success. Choose wisely!