Standards Comparison

    NIST CSF

    Voluntary
    2024

    Voluntary framework for cybersecurity risk management

    VS

    NIS2

    Mandatory
    2022

    EU directive for cybersecurity resilience across critical sectors

    Quick Verdict

    NIST CSF offers voluntary, flexible risk management for global organizations, while NIS2 mandates strict compliance for EU critical sectors with incident reporting and fines up to 2% turnover. Companies adopt CSF for best practices, NIS2 to avoid penalties.

    Cybersecurity

    NIST CSF

    NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Adds Govern function for strategic oversight
    • Uses Profiles for current-target gap analysis
    • Features six core Functions lifecycle approach
    • Provides four Tiers for maturity assessment
    • Emphasizes supply-chain risk management category
    Cybersecurity

    NIS2

    Network and Information Systems Directive 2 (NIS2)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Expanded scope to essential and important entities via size-cap rule
    • Strict multi-stage incident reporting timelines
    • Direct senior management accountability for compliance
    • Comprehensive risk management including supply chain security
    • Harmonized EU-wide cybersecurity cooperation and enforcement

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    NIST CSF Details

    What It Is

    The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 is a voluntary, risk-based guideline from the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology. It offers organizations of any size or sector a flexible structure to identify, manage, and reduce cybersecurity risks. Emphasizing outcomes over prescriptions, it integrates cybersecurity into enterprise risk strategies.

    Key Components

    • **Framework CoreSix Functions (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover) with 22 Categories and 112 Subcategories, linked to informative references like ISO 27001 and NIST SP 800-53.
    • **Implementation TiersFour qualitative levels (Partial, Risk Informed, Repeatable, Adaptive) to evaluate processes.
    • **ProfilesCurrent and Target alignments for prioritization. No certification required; self-attestation common.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Provides common language for executives, teams, and partners.
    • Demonstrates due care, manages supply chain risks, prioritizes investments.
    • Builds resilience, supports compliance (mandatory for U.S. federal), enhances trust. Adopted globally for strategic benefits.

    Implementation Overview

    • Assess current state, create Profiles, prioritize gaps via Tiers and Core.
    • Scalable for SMEs to enterprises, all industries, worldwide.
    • Uses free NIST resources, tooling; quick starts possible, third-party audits optional. (178 words)

    NIS2 Details

    What It Is

    The NIS2 Directive, officially Directive (EU) 2022/2555, is an EU regulation establishing a high common level of cybersecurity across member states. It expands the original NIS Directive's scope to essential and important entities in sectors like energy, transport, and digital infrastructure, using a risk-based approach for resilience.

    Key Components

    • Four pillars: risk management, business continuity, incident reporting, corporate accountability
    • Incident reporting timelines: early warning (24 hours), notification (72 hours), final report (1 month)
    • Leverages standards like ISO 27001, NIST CSF
    • Compliance via national transposition (by October 2024), CSIRT oversight

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for medium/large entities (50+ employees, €10M turnover) in covered sectors to avoid fines up to 2% global turnover
    • Enhances resilience against cyber threats, ensures service continuity
    • Builds trust, supports cross-border cooperation
    • Drives strategic cyber maturity

    Implementation Overview

    • Size-cap applicability check, gap analysis
    • Deploy risk assessments, supply chain controls, training
    • EU-wide, ongoing assurance with spot checks/audits
    • No certification, but registration and reporting required

    (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    NIST CSF
    Cybersecurity risk management lifecycle (Govern, ID, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover)
    NIS2
    Risk management, incident reporting, supply chain security for critical sectors

    Industry

    NIST CSF
    All sectors worldwide, any organization size
    NIS2
    Essential/important entities in EU sectors (energy, transport, digital providers)

    Nature

    NIST CSF
    Voluntary flexible framework, no enforcement
    NIS2
    Mandatory EU regulation, enforced by national authorities

    Testing

    NIST CSF
    Self-assessment via Profiles and Tiers
    NIS2
    Continuous assurance, spot checks, real-time evidence

    Penalties

    NIST CSF
    None (reputational or certification loss)
    NIS2
    Fines up to 2% global turnover or €10M

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about NIST CSF and NIS2

    NIST CSF FAQ

    NIS2 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages