GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/PCI DSS vs BRC
    Standards Comparison

    PCI DSS vs BRC

    PCI DSS

    Mandatory
    2022

    Global standard for securing payment cardholder data

    VS

    BRC

    Voluntary
    2022

    Global standard for food safety in manufacturing

    Quick Verdict

    PCI DSS secures cardholder data for payment processors via strict controls and audits, while BRC ensures food safety through HACCP and site standards for manufacturers. Companies adopt PCI DSS for contractual compliance; BRC for retailer access and GFSI benchmarking.

    Payment Security

    PCI DSS

    Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • 12 core data security requirements
    • Protection of cardholder data (CHD)
    • Continuous vulnerability management
    • Strict access control measures
    • Regular network monitoring and testing
    Food Safety

    BRC

    BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Codex HACCP-based food safety plan
    • Senior management commitment and culture
    • Fundamental non-negotiable requirements
    • Site standards and risk zoning
    • Environmental monitoring and food defense

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    PCI DSS Details

    What It Is

    PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) is a contractual security framework managed by the PCI Security Standards Council. It mandates protection of cardholder data (CHD) and sensitive authentication data (SAD) for merchants and service providers handling payment cards. Its control-based approach organizes 12 requirements into 6 objectives, emphasizing scope minimization and ongoing compliance.

    Key Components

    • 12 core requirements covering network security, data protection, vulnerability management, access controls, monitoring, and policies.
    • Over 300 sub-requirements with testing procedures.
    • v4.0 introduces customized approaches, MFA emphasis, and now-mandatory advanced controls.
    • Validation via SAQs, ROCs, QSAs, and ASVs based on transaction volume levels.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Contractual obligation from card brands to avoid fines, processing bans.
    • Reduces breach risks and costs ($37/record average).
    • Builds customer trust, enables market access.
    • Enhances overall cybersecurity hygiene.

    Implementation Overview

    • Assess-Repair-Report cycle with scoping, gap analysis, remediation.
    • Applies globally to all card-handling entities.
    • Costs $5K-$200K+; requires audits for high-volume entities. (178 words)

    BRC Details

    What It Is

    BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety is a GFSI-benchmarked certification framework for food manufacturers. It ensures product safety, legality, authenticity, and quality through a structured management system combining senior management commitment, Codex HACCP-based plans, and GMP/GHP prerequisites.

    Key Components

    Nine core clauses cover governance (Clause 1), HACCP (Clause 2), FSQMS (Clause 3), site standards (Clause 4), product/process controls (Clauses 5-6), personnel (Clause 7), risk zones (Clause 8), and traded products (Clause 9). Fundamental requirements are non-negotiable, with grading (AA/A/B/C/D) based on non-conformities. Built on risk assessments and annual audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Provides market access to retailers, reduces duplicate audits, demonstrates due diligence, and mitigates recall risks from allergens/pathogens. Enhances resilience, aligns with FSMA, and builds stakeholder trust.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: gap analysis, documentation, training, internal audits, certification audit. Suited for manufacturers globally; requires 6-12 months, CAPEX for site upgrades, and ongoing surveillance.

    Key Differences

    AspectPCI DSSBRC
    ScopeProtects cardholder data storage, processing, transmissionFood safety management, HACCP, site standards, personnel
    IndustryPayment card handling merchants, service providers globallyFood manufacturers, packaging, storage worldwide
    NatureContractual security standard, voluntary certificationGFSI-benchmarked food safety certification standard
    TestingQuarterly ASV scans, annual QSA ROC/SAQ, pentestsAnnual on-site audits, internal audits, unannounced options
    PenaltiesFines, card processing bans via contractsCertification withdrawal, delisting by retailers

    Scope

    PCI DSS
    Protects cardholder data storage, processing, transmission
    BRC
    Food safety management, HACCP, site standards, personnel

    Industry

    PCI DSS
    Payment card handling merchants, service providers globally
    BRC
    Food manufacturers, packaging, storage worldwide

    Nature

    PCI DSS
    Contractual security standard, voluntary certification
    BRC
    GFSI-benchmarked food safety certification standard

    Testing

    PCI DSS
    Quarterly ASV scans, annual QSA ROC/SAQ, pentests
    BRC
    Annual on-site audits, internal audits, unannounced options

    Penalties

    PCI DSS
    Fines, card processing bans via contracts
    BRC
    Certification withdrawal, delisting by retailers

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about PCI DSS and BRC

    PCI DSS FAQ

    BRC FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

    How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

    Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo

    Top 5 Reasons Automation Tools Like Vanta Slash SOC 2 Type 2 Timelines from Months to Weeks

    Top 5 Reasons Automation Tools Like Vanta Slash SOC 2 Type 2 Timelines from Months to Weeks

    Automation tools like Vanta cut SOC 2 Type 2 prep from 6 months to 6 weeks, saving 70% costs. See SignWell examples, AWS/Okta/GitHub integrations. CISOs: Get fi

    Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles

    Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles

    Transform NIST CSF 2.0 into quantifiable success: Define board-ready KPIs for Functions, build Profile dashboards, track Tier progression. Prove ROI amid cyber

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how PCI DSS and BRC compare against other standards

    Other PCI DSS Comparisons

    • PCI DSS vs CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    • PCI DSS vs ISO 27018
    • PCI DSS vs MAS TRM
    • PCI DSS vs NIST CSF
    • NIS2 vs PCI DSS

    Other BRC Comparisons

    • EPA vs BRC
    • WCAG vs BRC
    • ENERGY STAR vs BRC
    • ISO 50001 vs BRC
    • BREEAM vs BRC
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved