What is the primary objective of **POPIA**?

**POPIA’s primary objective is to safeguard personal information against unlawful processing while establishing minimum conditions for lawful processing, providing data subjects with rights and remedies, and ensuring compliance through the Information Regulator.** Enacted as the Protection of Personal Information Act, 2013 (Act 4 of 2013), it promotes constitutional privacy rights, balances information flows, and regulates processing of data relating to living natural persons and existing juristic persons via eight conditions in Chapter 3 (Sections 8–25).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **POPIA**?

**All Responsible Parties processing personal information in or using means in South Africa must comply with POPIA, including public, private, and non-profit entities, with no revenue or employee thresholds.** Responsible Parties determine processing purpose and means; Operators process on their behalf under contract (Sections 20–21). This applies extraterritorially to foreign entities processing South African data, covering natural and juristic persons’ information like names, IP addresses, biometrics, and health data (Section 1 definitions; exclusions in Sections 6–7).

Does **POPIA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**POPIA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** Compliance relies on self-demonstrated accountability (Condition 1, Section 8), with Responsible Parties ensuring conditions via internal measures like Personal Information Impact Assessments, security verification (Section 19(2)), and Information Officer oversight. The Information Regulator may investigate (Section 39) but requires no formal certification.

How often should an assessment for **POPIA** be performed?

**POPIA requires continuous security risk assessments under Section 19(2), with regular verification and updates to safeguards, but no fixed frequency for overall compliance assessments.** Responsible Parties must identify foreseeable risks, establish/verify safeguards ongoingly, and align to generally accepted practices (Section 19(3)). Practical governance includes periodic Personal Information Impact Assessments, especially for high-risk processing (Sections 57–59).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **POPIA**?

**Non-compliance with POPIA incurs administrative fines up to **ZAR 10 million** (Section 109), criminal penalties including up to 10 years’ imprisonment (Section 107), and civil damages (Section 99).** The Information Regulator considers factors like data nature, affected subjects, preventability, and prior offenses. Responsible Parties remain liable for Operators (Sections 20–21).

Can **POPIA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, POPIA’s principles like purpose limitation, security safeguards, and data subject rights align closely with frameworks such as GDPR.** Its eight conditions (Sections 8–25) and Section 19 security lifecycle map to ISO 27001’s continual improvement, enabling integrated compliance programs without direct transposition due to POPIA’s juristic person scope and Information Officer mandate.

What is the first step to begin implementing **POPIA**?

**The first step for POPIA implementation is appointing and registering an **Information Officer** as the head of the Responsible Party (with possible deputies).** This statutory role (POPIA manual guidance) drives compliance framework development, Personal Information Impact Assessments, training, and Regulator liaison, ensuring accountability (Section 8) from inception.

What is the primary objective of **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C's primary objective is to specify quality management system requirements for aviation maintenance organizations to ensure consistent provision of safe, compliant products and services meeting customer and regulatory requirements.** It incorporates ISO 9001:2015's Annex SL structure across Clauses 4–10, adding maintenance-specific controls like configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, product safety, traceability, and human factors to support continuing airworthiness in repair stations and MRO providers.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C applies to aviation maintenance organizations, including repair stations, MRO providers, and OEMs with autonomous maintenance operations.** It targets entities performing maintenance, repair, overhaul, or continuing airworthiness tasks on civil, private, or military aircraft, regardless of size. Compliance is often contractually required by OEMs, airlines, and regulators for OASIS listing and supply chain access, with customer/regulatory requirements overriding the standard.

Does **AS9110C** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9110C requires third-party certification through accredited bodies listed in the IAQG OASIS database.** Organizations must demonstrate full QMS implementation via Stage 1 (documentation review) and Stage 2 (on-site effectiveness audit), with the system operational for at least three months, including internal audits and management review. Surveillance audits occur annually, recertification every three years.

How often should an assessment for **AS9110C** be performed?

**Internal audits for AS9110C must be performed at planned intervals based on process risk, status, and results, covering all Clauses 4–10 at least annually.** Management reviews occur at predetermined intervals, typically aligned with business cycles, using performance data from monitoring, audits, and nonconformities. External surveillance audits are annual post-certification, with full recertification every three years.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9110C**?

**Non-compliance with AS9110C risks loss of certification, exclusion from IAQG OASIS, contract ineligibility, and regulatory sanctions like repair station certificate suspension.** It can lead to OEM/airline contract termination, safety incidents undermining airworthiness, increased liability from maintenance errors, rework costs, and market exclusion, as it fails to demonstrate controlled processes for traceability and configuration.

Can **AS9110C** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9110C aligns directly with ISO 9001:2015 via its Annex SL high-level structure and common terminology like "documented information" and "external providers."** IAQG correlation matrices facilitate mapping, enabling integrated management systems while retaining AS9110C's maintenance-specific additions like counterfeit prevention and human factors.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9110C**?

**The first step is to define the QMS scope, determine internal/external issues, and identify interested parties per Clause 4, justifying any non-applicable requirements.** Conduct a gap analysis against Clauses 4–10 using audit checklists, prioritizing aviation controls like operational planning (Clause 8) and risk-based thinking (Clauses 6.1, 8.1.1), followed by leadership commitment and a formal project plan.

POPIA vs AS9110C

Standards Comparison

POPIA

Mandatory

2013

South Africa’s regulation for personal information protection

AS9110C

Mandatory

2016

Aerospace QMS standard for aviation maintenance organizations.

Quick Verdict

POPIA mandates privacy compliance for South African organizations processing personal data, enforcing rights and security with heavy fines. AS9110C is a voluntary aerospace QMS certification ensuring safe aircraft maintenance. Companies adopt POPIA for legal compliance, AS9110C for market access and quality.

Data Privacy

POPIA

Protection of Personal Information Act, 2013 (Act 4 of 2013)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Protects personal information of juristic persons
Mandates eight conditions for lawful processing
Requires Information Officer for accountability
Enforces continuous security safeguards cycle
Imposes prior authorisation for high-risk processing

Quality Management

AS9110C

AS9110C: Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Risk-based thinking in strategic and operational planning
Configuration management and traceability controls
Counterfeit and suspect parts prevention
Human factors in root cause analysis
Maintenance release and airworthiness requirements

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

POPIA Details

What It Is

Protection of Personal Information Act, 2013 (Act 4 of 2013)—POPIA—is South Africa’s comprehensive privacy regulation. It establishes enforceable requirements for processing personal information of natural and juristic persons, overseen by the Information Regulator. Employs a principle-based approach with eight conditions for lawful processing and risk-based accountability.

Key Components

**Eight conditionsAccountability, processing limitation, purpose specification, further processing limitation, information quality, openness, security safeguards, data subject participation.
Data subject rights (Sections 23–25, 11(3)): Access, correction, objection, breach notification.
**GovernanceMandatory Information Officer, operator contracts (Sections 20–21).
No certification; compliance via Regulator enforcement, fines up to ZAR 10 million.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandated by law to avoid fines, imprisonment, civil claims. Enhances trust, data hygiene, operational efficiency. Manages risks from breaches, third-parties; GDPR-aligned benefits for multinationals.

Implementation Overview

Risk-based phases: Gap analysis, data mapping, policies, security controls, training. Applies universally—no thresholds. Involves inventories, DPIAs, vendor governance; ongoing audits, no formal certification.

AS9110C Details

What It Is

AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is an international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation maintenance organizations, such as repair stations and MRO providers. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements using Annex SL structure and risk-based thinking across Clauses 4–10.

Key Components

Core pillars: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, traceability, product safety.
Follows PDCA cycle; no fixed number of controls but requires documented information for all applicable clauses.
Certification via IAQG-accredited bodies with OASIS listing.

Why Organizations Use It

Ensures continuing airworthiness and regulatory compliance (e.g., FAA/EASA).
Mitigates safety risks, enhances customer satisfaction and on-time delivery.
Provides market access to OEMs, airlines; builds stakeholder trust.
Drives operational efficiency and continual improvement.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: gap analysis, process design, training, audits, certification.
Involves risk registers, competence programs, supplier controls.
Suited for MROs of all sizes globally; requires 3+ months operational data pre-certification.

Key Differences

Aspect	POPIA	AS9110C
Scope	Personal information processing conditions, rights, security	Aerospace MRO quality management, maintenance controls
Industry	All sectors in South Africa, universal applicability	Aviation maintenance organizations worldwide
Nature	Mandatory privacy statute with Regulator enforcement	Voluntary QMS certification standard
Testing	Continuous security measures, breach response workflows	Internal audits, certification audits every 3 years
Penalties	ZAR 10M fines, imprisonment, civil damages	Loss of certification, market exclusion

Scope

POPIA

Personal information processing conditions, rights, security

AS9110C

Aerospace MRO quality management, maintenance controls

Industry

POPIA

All sectors in South Africa, universal applicability

AS9110C

Aviation maintenance organizations worldwide

Nature

POPIA

Mandatory privacy statute with Regulator enforcement

AS9110C

Voluntary QMS certification standard

Testing

POPIA

Continuous security measures, breach response workflows

AS9110C

Internal audits, certification audits every 3 years

Penalties

POPIA

ZAR 10M fines, imprisonment, civil damages

AS9110C

Loss of certification, market exclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about POPIA and AS9110C

POPIA FAQ

AS9110C FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance

Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses

Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

EN 1090 vs ISO 27017

Compare EN 1090 vs ISO 27017: Key standards for steel/aluminum CE marking compliance vs cloud security controls. Gain insights for EU market access & ISMS integration today.

SAFe vs ISO 27017

Compare SAFe vs ISO 27017: Scale agile enterprises with SAFe frameworks or secure clouds via ISO 27017 controls. Boost compliance & agility now!

BREEAM vs FSSC 22000

Compare BREEAM vs FSSC 22000: Sustainability certification for buildings meets food safety standards. Uncover key differences, benefits & implementation strategies. Boost compliance now!

POPIA

AS9110C

Quick Verdict

POPIA

Key Features

AS9110C

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

POPIA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

AS9110C Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

POPIA FAQ

What is the primary objective of POPIA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with POPIA?

Does POPIA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for POPIA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with POPIA?

Can POPIA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing POPIA?

AS9110C FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9110C?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9110C?

Does AS9110C require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9110C be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9110C?

Can AS9110C be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9110C?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

EN 1090 vs ISO 27017

SAFe vs ISO 27017

BREEAM vs FSSC 22000