What is the primary objective of **SAFe**?

**The primary objective of SAFe is to scale Lean-Agile practices across large enterprises to achieve Business Agility through alignment, collaboration, and value delivery.** SAFe integrates 10 immutable Lean-Agile principles, such as taking an economic view and organizing around value, with seven core competencies including Lean-Agile Leadership and Continuous Learning Culture. It structures workflows via Agile Release Trains (ARTs) of 50-125 members and Program Increments (PIs) of 8-12 weeks, enabling faster time-to-market, improved quality, and employee engagement in complex software and IT environments.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SAFe**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with SAFe, as it is a voluntary framework for enterprise agility.** Professionally, large enterprises scaling Agile beyond single teams—particularly in software development, IT operations, and regulated sectors like finance or healthcare—adopt SAFe to coordinate hundreds of teams. Over 20,000 enterprises and 1 million certified professionals use its configurations from Essential SAFe for foundational ARTs to Full SAFe for portfolio governance.

Does **SAFe** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**SAFe does not require external audits or third-party certification for implementation.** Success relies on internal practices like PI Planning, Inspect and Adapt workshops, and certifications such as SAFe Agilist, RTE, or SPC through Scaled Agile's academy. Organizations self-assess maturity via roadmaps, with tools like Jira Align supporting compliance in regulated environments through 'trust but verify' embedding.

How often should an assessment for **SAFe** be performed?

**SAFe assessments should be performed continuously via Inspect and Adapt workshops at the end of each 8-12 week Program Increment (PI).** PI events include retrospectives for metrics like flow and velocity, with maturity evaluations during implementation roadmaps. Ongoing reviews via ART Syncs and portfolio governance ensure relentless improvement aligned to the seven core competencies.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SAFe**?

**Non-compliance with SAFe carries no legal penalties, but results in business risks like siloed teams, delayed value delivery, and failed agility transformations.** Poor implementation leads to critiques of hierarchy, over-customization, or 'SAFe washing,' yielding suboptimal outcomes such as extended time-to-market and low employee engagement versus reported 30-75% productivity gains in successful adoptions.

Can **SAFe** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SAFe can be mapped to other frameworks, though it integrates elements of Agile, Lean, Scrum, Kanban, and DevOps natively.** Its configurations align with Spotify models or LeSS for scaling, using artifacts like PI Objectives and Program Boards for compatibility. Tools like Atlassian Jira and Vanta facilitate mappings in DevOps pipelines and compliance contexts.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SAFe**?

**The first step to implement SAFe is to train executives in Lean-Agile Leadership via Leading SAFe certification and conduct a value stream assessment.** Follow the Implementation Roadmap: identify value streams, form a Lean-Agile Center of Excellence (LACE), and launch with Essential SAFe for an ART, ensuring leadership buy-in to drive the dual operating system.

What is the primary objective of **Australian Privacy Act**?

**The primary objective of the Australian Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) is to regulate the handling of personal information by Australian Government agencies and eligible private sector organisations to promote and protect individual privacy while facilitating transborder information flows.** This is achieved through the **13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)**, which govern collection, use, disclosure, security, and individual rights, enforced by the **Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC)**.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **Australian Privacy Act**?

**APP entities under the Australian Privacy Act include all Australian Government agencies and private sector organisations with annual turnover exceeding AU$3 million.** Compliance also extends to **small business operators (SBOs)** providing health services, trading in personal information, holding **Consumer Data Right (CDR)** accreditation, offering **Digital ID Act 2024** accredited services, or handling **tax file numbers (TFNs)**; foreign entities with an **Australian link** are captured via extraterritorial reach.

Does **Australian Privacy Act** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, the Australian Privacy Act does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** The **OAIC** conducts voluntary privacy assessments and commissioner-initiated investigations, but entities must demonstrate **reasonable steps** under **APP 11** (security) through internal governance, with enforcement via civil penalties for non-compliance.

How often should an assessment for **Australian Privacy Act** be performed?

**Assessments for Australian Privacy Act compliance should be performed continuously as part of risk management, with formal reviews at least annually or upon material changes.** **OAIC guidance** emphasizes ongoing monitoring of **APPs**, **NDB scheme** readiness (post-22 February 2018 breaches), and high-risk activities like cross-border disclosures under **APP 8**, scaling with entity size and data sensitivity.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **Australian Privacy Act**?

**Non-compliance with the Australian Privacy Act can result in civil penalties up to AU$50 million or 30% of adjusted annual turnover for serious or repeated interferences with privacy.** The **OAIC** may issue determinations, enforceable undertakings, infringement notices, or seek **Federal Court** penalties (e.g., AU$5.8 million in Australian Clinical Labs case), plus reputational damage from **NDB** notifications.

Can **Australian Privacy Act** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, the Australian Privacy Act's APPs can be mapped to other international frameworks through principles-based alignment.** **APP 8** (cross-border) and **APP 11** (security) overlap with GDPR adequacy considerations and ISO 27701 controls, enabling operational harmonization for multinational entities while retaining unique elements like the **NDB scheme**.

What is the first step to begin implementing **Australian Privacy Act**?

**The first step to implement the Australian Privacy Act is to conduct a scope assessment to determine APP entity status and map personal information flows.** Identify turnover (AU$3M threshold), SBO exceptions, data inventories, and high-risk holdings (e.g., sensitive health data), per **OAIC guidance**, to prioritize **APP 1** policy development and **APP 11** security controls.

SAFe vs Australian Privacy Act

Standards Comparison

SAFe

Voluntary

2023

Framework for scaling Lean-Agile in enterprises

Australian Privacy Act

Mandatory

1988

Australian federal law for personal information protection

Quick Verdict

SAFe scales Agile for enterprise software delivery, adopted voluntarily for faster time-to-market. Australian Privacy Act mandates personal data protection for Australian organizations, enforced by OAIC with heavy fines to safeguard privacy.

Agile Scaling

SAFe

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe 6.0)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Synchronizes 50-125 people via Agile Release Trains (ARTs)
Aligns execution through 8-12 week Program Increments (PIs)
Guides with 10 immutable Lean-Agile principles
Scales via Essential to Full configurations
Fosters Business Agility with seven core competencies

Data Privacy

Australian Privacy Act

Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)
Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) scheme
APP 11 security and retention requirements
APP 8 cross-border disclosure accountability
OAIC enforcement with high penalties

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SAFe Details

What It Is

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe® 6.0) is a comprehensive enterprise framework for scaling Lean-Agile practices across large organizations. Its primary purpose is to achieve Business Agility by aligning strategy, execution, and operations in complex software and IT environments. The approach integrates Agile, Lean, systems thinking, and DevOps for predictable value delivery.

Key Components

**Agile Release Trains (ARTs)50-125 cross-functional teams synchronized for flow.
**Program Increments (PIs)8-12 week cadences with PI Planning and Inspect & Adapt.
10 immutable Lean-Agile principles and seven core competencies (e.g., Lean-Agile Leadership, Continuous Learning Culture).
Scalable configurations: Essential, Large Solution, Portfolio, Full SAFe.
Key roles: Release Train Engineer (RTE), Product Management; no formal certification but extensive training ecosystem.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives 20-50% faster time-to-market, 30-75% productivity gains, improved quality, and employee engagement. Enables compliance in regulated industries (GDPR, SOC 2) via embedded governance. Reduces risks through alignment and flow metrics; builds competitive agility and stakeholder trust.

Implementation Overview

Follows structured **Implementation Roadmapexecutive training (SAFe Agilist), value stream mapping, phased ART launches with SPC coaching. Suited for large enterprises in software/IT/ops; tools like Jira Align, Vanta. Ongoing via metrics and retrospectives; 1M+ trained professionals worldwide.

Australian Privacy Act Details

What It Is

The Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) is Australia's primary federal privacy regulation, regulating the handling of personal information by government agencies and private sector organizations. Its principles-based approach balances privacy protection with information flows via the 13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), covering collection to destruction.

Key Components

**13 APPsGovernance, collection, use/disclosure, security (APP 11), cross-border (APP 8), and rights.
**Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) schemeMandatory notifications for serious harm breaches.
**OAIC enforcementInvestigations, audits, penalties up to AUD 50M. Compliance via risk management, no formal certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Legal mandate for APP entities (> $3M turnover, health providers).
Mitigates fines, reputational damage; enables trust, data flows.
Strategic risk management overlapping cyber, vendor governance.

Implementation Overview

Phased: discovery, policy design, controls deployment, NDB readiness. Applies economy-wide, scales by size/risk. OAIC guidance, no certification but audits expected. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	SAFe	Australian Privacy Act
Scope	Scaling Agile for enterprise software/IT delivery	Personal information handling and protection
Industry	Software, IT operations, enterprises globally	All sectors in Australia, mandatory for large orgs
Nature	Voluntary framework with certifications	Mandatory law with civil penalties
Testing	PI planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops	OAIC audits, breach assessments
Penalties	None (certification loss, business risk)	Up to AUD 50M fines or 30% turnover

Scope

SAFe

Scaling Agile for enterprise software/IT delivery

Australian Privacy Act

Personal information handling and protection

Industry

SAFe

Software, IT operations, enterprises globally

Australian Privacy Act

All sectors in Australia, mandatory for large orgs

Nature

SAFe

Voluntary framework with certifications

Australian Privacy Act

Mandatory law with civil penalties

Testing

SAFe

PI planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops

Australian Privacy Act

OAIC audits, breach assessments

Penalties

SAFe

None (certification loss, business risk)

Australian Privacy Act

Up to AUD 50M fines or 30% turnover

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SAFe and Australian Privacy Act

SAFe FAQ

Australian Privacy Act FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo

Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts

Advanced compliance tools use AI, analytics & real-time monitoring to predict regulatory shifts, cut non-compliance costs 3x, and ensure audit readiness. Stay p

ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Extending Your ISMS to PIMS in 12 Months or Less

Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS in 12 months with our phased roadmap. Templates, checklists & infographics for RoPA, DSARs & audit-ready privacy complia

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27032 vs ISO 13485

ISO 27032 vs ISO 13485: Compare cybersecurity guidelines for Internet threats with medical device QMS standards. Key differences, strategies, compliance tips. Boost resilience now!

NIST 800-53 vs ISO 13485

Compare NIST 800-53 vs ISO 13485: cyber controls & baselines meet med device QMS. Uncover differences, risk mgmt, RMF integration & compliance wins for regulated ops. Optimize now!

EN 1090 vs FedRAMP

EN 1090 vs FedRAMP: EU steel/aluminum execution standards for CE marking & Factory Production Control vs US federal cloud security baselines (Low/Mod/High). Compare for compliance now!

SAFe

Australian Privacy Act

Quick Verdict

SAFe

Key Features

Australian Privacy Act

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SAFe Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Australian Privacy Act Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SAFe FAQ

What is the primary objective of SAFe?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SAFe?

Does SAFe require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SAFe be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SAFe?

Can SAFe be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SAFe?

Australian Privacy Act FAQ

What is the primary objective of Australian Privacy Act?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with Australian Privacy Act?

Does Australian Privacy Act require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for Australian Privacy Act be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with Australian Privacy Act?

Can Australian Privacy Act be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing Australian Privacy Act?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts

ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Extending Your ISMS to PIMS in 12 Months or Less

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27032 vs ISO 13485

NIST 800-53 vs ISO 13485

EN 1090 vs FedRAMP