What is the primary objective of **SAFe**?

**The primary objective of SAFe is to scale Lean-Agile practices across large enterprises to achieve Business Agility by aligning strategy, execution, and operations.** SAFe, in version 6.0, integrates 10 immutable Lean-Agile principles (e.g., take an economic view, apply systems thinking, organize around value) with seven core competencies like Lean-Agile Leadership, Agile Product Delivery, and Continuous Learning Culture. This enables predictable value delivery through Agile Release Trains (**ARTs** of 50-125 people) and Program Increments (**PIs** of 8-12 weeks), addressing challenges in software development and IT operations for over 20,000 enterprises.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SAFe**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with SAFe, as it is a voluntary framework for enterprise agility rather than a regulatory standard.** Professionally, large enterprises with hundreds of teams in software delivery or IT operations—such as those exceeding single-team Scrum limits—adopt SAFe for scaling, with 30% market share and over 1 million certified practitioners. It suits firms like Philips or NASA facing coordination chaos across **ARTs**, **Solution Trains**, or portfolios.

Does **SAFe** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**SAFe does not require external audits or third-party certification for core implementation.** Success relies on internal practices like **PI Planning**, **Inspect and Adapt** workshops, and certifications such as SAFe Agilist, RTE, or SPC via Scaled Agile Academy. Organizations self-assess maturity through value stream mapping and metrics (e.g., flow, velocity), though regulated sectors embed compliance (e.g., GDPR, SOC 2) via 'trust but verify' in **ARTs**.

How often should an assessment for **SAFe** be performed?

**SAFe assessments should be performed continuously via Inspect and Adapt workshops at the end of each 8-12 week Program Increment (PI), with maturity evaluations during initial implementation.** Pre-launch uses readiness assessments like HCL's multi-dimensional models; ongoing metrics track **PI Objectives**, ART flow, and competencies. Leading SAFe training recommends phased reviews to tailor configurations from Essential to Full SAFe.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SAFe**?

**Non-compliance with SAFe carries no legal penalties, but results in business risks like siloed teams, delayed time-to-market, and failed scaling.** Poor implementation leads to pitfalls such as 'SAFe washing' (superficial adoption), dependency chaos, or 30-70% transformation failure rates, yielding lost productivity (versus 30-75% gains) and quality defects. Enterprises revert to waterfall inefficiencies without **ART** alignment.

An **SAFe** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SAFe maps extensively to frameworks like Scrum, Kanban, LeSS, DevOps, and Disciplined Agile Delivery (DAD).** Essential SAFe builds on team-level Scrum/XP with **ARTs** extending to programs; Portfolio SAFe aligns with Lean Portfolio Management. Tools like Jira Align and Vanta facilitate integrations, enabling hybrid models while preserving SAFe's 10 principles and **PI** cadence.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SAFe**?

**The first step to implement SAFe is to conduct Leading SAFe training for executives and form a Lean-Agile Center of Excellence (LACE).** Follow the Implementation Roadmap: train via SAFe Agilist certification, perform value stream mapping, and identify **ARTs** before launch. This phased approach starts with Essential SAFe, prioritizing leadership buy-in for configurations up to Full SAFe.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 26000**?

**ISO 26000 provides voluntary international guidance on social responsibility to help organizations integrate sustainable practices into their decisions and activities.** Published in November 2010 and confirmed current in 2021, it defines social responsibility as accountability for impacts on society and the environment through transparent, ethical behavior that contributes to sustainable development, respects stakeholder expectations, complies with law, aligns with international norms, and embeds SR throughout the organization.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 26000**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 26000, as it is voluntary guidance applicable to all types regardless of size, location, or sector.** It targets private, public, and non-profit entities, including SMEs, multinationals, governments, and NGOs, encouraging contextual adoption via stakeholder engagement to address relevant core subjects like governance, human rights, and environment.

Does **ISO 26000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 26000 explicitly prohibits external audits or third-party certification, as it contains no requirements and is not a management system standard.** Clause 1 states certification claims misrepresent its purpose; organizations should self-assess, report transparently using the ISO 26000 Communication Protocol, and align with voluntary assurance for disclosures.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 26000** be performed?

**ISO 26000 recommends periodic self-assessments at appropriate intervals aligned with organizational context and stakeholder needs.** Guidance in Clause 7 emphasizes ongoing integration and review through stakeholder-informed processes, with reporting on objectives, achievements, shortfalls, and improvements typically annually or as part of management reviews.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 26000**?

**There are no direct legal consequences for non-compliance with ISO 26000, as it imposes no mandatory requirements.** Indirect risks include reputational damage, stakeholder distrust, lost market access, or misalignment with aligned frameworks like OECD Guidelines, potentially amplifying exposure to sector-specific regulations on human rights or environment.

An **ISO 26000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 26000 aligns with international frameworks through special agreements and linkage documents.** It maps to OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, UN Global Compact, GRI standards, and UN 2030 Agenda/SDGs, with IWA 26:2017 providing guidance for integration into management systems, enabling structured ESG materiality and due diligence.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 26000**?

**The first step is recognizing social responsibility and engaging stakeholders per Clause 5 to understand organizational context and impacts.** This involves mapping impacts across the seven core subjects, identifying relevant issues through dialogue, and prioritizing based on significance to inform governance and integration strategies.

SAFe vs ISO 26000

Standards Comparison

SAFe

Voluntary

2023

Framework scaling Lean-Agile practices across enterprises

ISO 26000

Voluntary

2010

International guidance standard for social responsibility

Quick Verdict

SAFe scales Agile for enterprise software delivery, enabling business agility in IT. ISO 26000 guides social responsibility across all organizations, promoting ethical governance and sustainability. Companies adopt SAFe for faster value delivery; ISO 26000 for stakeholder trust and risk mitigation.

Agile Scaling

SAFe

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe 6.0)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Coordinates 50-125 people in Agile Release Trains (ARTs)
Delivers value via 8-12 week Program Increments (PIs)
Guided by 10 immutable Lean-Agile principles
Drives Business Agility with 7 core competencies
Scales via 4 configurations: Essential to Full SAFe

Social Responsibility

ISO 26000

ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Non-certifiable guidance for all organizations
Seven core subjects for holistic SR coverage
Seven principles like accountability and transparency
Stakeholder engagement for issue prioritization
Integration with existing management systems

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SAFe Details

What It Is

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe 6.0) is a comprehensive framework for scaling Lean-Agile practices across large enterprises. It integrates Agile, Lean, and systems thinking to align strategy, execution, and operations in complex software and IT environments, focusing on Business Agility through configurable levels from Essential to Full SAFe.

Key Components

**Agile Release Trains (ARTs)50-125 cross-functional teams delivering value.
**10 immutable Lean-Agile principlesEconomic view, systems thinking, value flow.
**7 core competenciesLean-Agile Leadership, Team Agility, Continuous Learning Culture.
**Program Increments (PIs)8-12 week cadences with PI Planning and Inspect & Adapt. No formal certification required, but SAFe Academy offers role-based training like RTE.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives faster time-to-market (20-50%), productivity gains (30-75%), quality improvements. Enables compliance in regulated industries via embedded governance. Builds stakeholder trust through alignment and flow metrics; competitive edge in digital transformation.

Implementation Overview

Phased roadmap: Value stream mapping, leadership training, ART launches. Applies to large enterprises in IT/software; tools like Jira Align. Demands cultural shift, SPC coaching; 12-18 months typical for maturity.

ISO 26000 Details

What It Is

ISO 26000:2010 is the international guidance standard on social responsibility (SR). It provides a voluntary framework for all organizations to integrate SR into operations, regardless of size, sector, or location. The principles-based approach emphasizes holistic assessment of impacts via stakeholder engagement and context-specific prioritization.

Key Components

**Seven core subjectsorganizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement/development.
**Seven principlesaccountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for stakeholder interests, rule of law, international norms, human rights.
Non-certifiable; focuses on self-assessment, reporting, and integration.

Why Organizations Use It

Builds sustainability commitment and operational resilience.
Mitigates risks (reputational, supply chain, regulatory).
Enhances stakeholder trust, aligns with SDGs/OECD/GRI.
Offers competitive advantages without certification costs.

Implementation Overview

Phased: materiality assessment, stakeholder engagement, policy integration, training, reporting.
Universal applicability; no mandatory audits, but transparent communication essential.

Key Differences

Aspect	SAFe	ISO 26000
Scope	Scaling Agile for enterprise software/IT	Social responsibility across governance/human rights/environment
Industry	Software, IT operations, regulated sectors	All organizations, all sectors worldwide
Nature	Voluntary scaling framework, configurable	Non-certifiable guidance standard, voluntary
Testing	PI Planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops	Self-assessment, stakeholder engagement, no certification
Penalties	No penalties, implementation failure risks	No penalties, reputational risks only

Scope

SAFe

Scaling Agile for enterprise software/IT

ISO 26000

Social responsibility across governance/human rights/environment

Industry

SAFe

Software, IT operations, regulated sectors

ISO 26000

All organizations, all sectors worldwide

Nature

SAFe

Voluntary scaling framework, configurable

ISO 26000

Non-certifiable guidance standard, voluntary

Testing

SAFe

PI Planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops

ISO 26000

Self-assessment, stakeholder engagement, no certification

Penalties

SAFe

No penalties, implementation failure risks

ISO 26000

No penalties, reputational risks only

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SAFe and ISO 26000

SAFe FAQ

ISO 26000 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2

Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses

Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 45001 vs COPPA

Unlock ISO 45001 vs COPPA: Contrast OH&S leadership, risk planning & audits with child privacy consent rules. Essential compliance guide boosts safety & legal edge now.

TISAX vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Unlock TISAX vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11: Automotive security meets pharma data integrity. Key differences, compliance strategies & implementation guide. Secure your supply chain—compare now!

NIST CSF vs LGPD

Compare NIST CSF vs LGPD: Bridge cybersecurity risk management with Brazil's data protection law. Uncover differences, compliance strategies & best practices to secure data globally. Dive in!

SAFe

ISO 26000

Quick Verdict

SAFe

Key Features

ISO 26000

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SAFe Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 26000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SAFe FAQ

What is the primary objective of SAFe?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SAFe?

Does SAFe require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SAFe be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SAFe?

An SAFe be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SAFe?

ISO 26000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 26000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 26000?

Does ISO 26000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 26000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 26000?

An ISO 26000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 26000?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 45001 vs COPPA

TISAX vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11

NIST CSF vs LGPD