What is the primary objective of **SAFe**?

**The primary objective of SAFe is to scale Lean-Agile practices across large enterprises to achieve Business Agility.** SAFe provides organization and workflow patterns integrating 10 immutable Lean-Agile principles—such as taking an economic view and organizing around value—with seven core competencies like Lean-Agile Leadership and Continuous Learning Culture. This enables alignment of strategy, execution, and operations via Agile Release Trains (ARTs) of 50-125 people delivering value in 8-12 week Program Increments (PIs).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SAFe**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with SAFe, as it is a voluntary framework for enterprise agility.** Professionally, large enterprises with hundreds of distributed teams in software development and IT operations adopt SAFe to address scaling challenges, with over 20,000 organizations and 1 million certified practitioners using its configurations from Essential SAFe to Full SAFe.

Does **SAFe** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**SAFe does not require external audits or third-party certification.** Implementation relies on internal practices like PI Planning, Inspect and Adapt workshops, and Scaled Agile certifications (e.g., SAFe Agilist, RTE) to build competencies, with success measured via metrics such as flow, velocity, and PI Objectives rather than formal audits.

How often should an assessment for **SAFe** be performed?

**SAFe assessments should be performed continuously through Inspect and Adapt workshops at the end of each 8-12 week Program Increment (PI).** Pre-implementation readiness assessments via value stream mapping and maturity models (e.g., HCL-style evaluations) occur once, followed by ongoing retrospectives, PI confidence votes, and ROAM risk analysis to drive relentless improvement.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SAFe**?

**Non-compliance with SAFe results in business risks like siloed teams, delayed value delivery, and missed agility goals, with no legal penalties.** Poor implementation leads to pitfalls such as 'SAFe washing,' dependency chaos, or 30-70% transformation failure rates, yielding slower time-to-market, lower productivity, and failure to achieve reported gains like 30-75% improvements.

Can **SAFe** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**SAFe integrates natively with frameworks like Scrum, Kanban, DevOps, and Lean but is not designed for direct mapping to other international standards.** Its Essential to Full configurations extend team-level practices (e.g., SAFe Scrum) to portfolio levels, embedding compliance via 'trust but verify' for regulated environments like GDPR or SOC 2 through ART roles and tools like Vanta.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SAFe**?

**The first step to implement SAFe is to train executives in Lean-Agile Leadership via Leading SAFe or SAFe Agilist certification.** This is followed by forming a Lean-Agile Center of Excellence (LACE), conducting value stream mapping, and launching an initial ART per the SAFe Implementation Roadmap to ensure leadership buy-in and tailored configuration selection.

What is the primary objective of **NIST 800-171**?

**NIST SP 800-171 provides recommended security requirements for protecting the confidentiality of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in nonfederal systems and organizations.** It applies to components that process, store, transmit CUI, or provide protection for such components, tailored from SP 800-53 Moderate baseline. Revision 3 (May 2024) supersedes Rev 2, organizing requirements into 17 families including new areas like Supply Chain Risk Management.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **NIST 800-171**?

**Nonfederal organizations handling CUI via federal contracts, grants, or agreements must implement NIST SP 800-171.** This includes DoD contractors and subcontractors under DFARS 252.204-7012 for covered contractor information systems processing Covered Defense Information (CDI). Applicability is contractual, not direct law, targeting systems not operated on behalf of agencies.

Does **NIST 800-171** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, NIST SP 800-171 does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** Organizations develop a System Security Plan (SSP) and Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M) for self-assessment per SP 800-171A procedures (examine/interview/test). DoD may require SPRS score submission or CMMC Level 2 certification aligning to these requirements.

How often should an assessment for **NIST 800-171** be performed?

**Organizations must perform and document security assessments at an organization-defined frequency in their SSP.** SP 800-171 (3.12.1) requires assessing security controls, with results informing the SSP and POA&M. DoD contractors typically conduct annual self-assessments for SPRS, with continuous monitoring via audit logs and risk assessments.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **NIST 800-171**?

**Non-compliance risks contract ineligibility, termination, and remediation demands under DFARS 252.204-7012.** DoD uses SPRS scores (potential -203 minimum) for procurement decisions; failures may lead to False Claims Act liability, 72-hour incident reporting obligations, and exclusion from bids. No direct fines, but business disqualification is primary.

Can **NIST 800-171** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, NIST SP 800-171 Appendix D provides explicit mappings to NIST SP 800-53 and other frameworks.** Rev 2 maps to ISO 27001; Rev 3 aligns closely with SP 800-53 Rev 5. Organizations demonstrate compliance within established programs via SSP documentation, supporting tailoring and equivalency.

What is the first step to begin implementing **NIST 800-171**?

**Define the system boundary and inventory components processing, storing, or transmitting CUI.** Per SP 800-171 guidance, create data flow maps and isolate a CUI security domain using boundary protections. Develop an initial SSP documenting scope, environment, and requirements status to guide gap analysis and POA&M.

SAFe vs NIST 800-171

Standards Comparison

SAFe

Voluntary

2023

Enterprise framework scaling Lean-Agile for Business Agility

NIST 800-171

Mandatory

2020

U.S. standard for protecting CUI in nonfederal systems.

Quick Verdict

SAFe scales Agile for enterprise software delivery and business agility, while NIST 800-171 mandates CUI protection in nonfederal systems via DFARS contracts. Companies adopt SAFe for faster time-to-market; NIST 800-171 for federal compliance and contract eligibility.

Agile Scaling

SAFe

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) 6.0

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Agile Release Trains synchronize 50-125 people across teams
Program Increments enable 8-12 week predictable value delivery
10 immutable Lean-Agile principles guide economic decision-making
Seven core competencies drive enterprise Business Agility
Scalable configurations from Essential to Full SAFe

Controlled Unclassified Information

NIST 800-171

NIST SP 800-171 Protecting CUI in Nonfederal Systems

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Protects CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems
110 requirements across 17 control families (r3)
SSP and POA&M for implementation documentation
Scoped enclave boundaries for cost efficiency
FedRAMP Moderate equivalence for cloud services

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SAFe Details

What It Is

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) 6.0 is a comprehensive framework for scaling Lean-Agile practices across enterprises. It integrates Agile, Lean, and systems thinking to achieve Business Agility, focusing on aligning strategy, execution, and operations in large-scale software and IT environments through structured workflows and roles.

Key Components

**Agile Release Trains (ARTs)50-125 people delivering value in Program Increments (PIs).
**10 Lean-Agile PrinciplesImmutable foundation like economic view and value flow.
**7 Core CompetenciesIncluding Lean-Agile Leadership, Team Agility, and Continuous Learning Culture.
**4 ConfigurationsEssential, Large Solution, Portfolio, Full SAFe. No formal certification required, but SAFe Agilist and RTE trainings support adoption.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives faster time-to-market (20-50%), productivity gains (30-75%), and quality improvements. Enables compliance in regulated industries via embedded governance. Reduces risks through alignment and flow metrics, boosting employee engagement and competitive edge in digital transformation.

Implementation Overview

Follow phased **Implementation Roadmapvalue stream mapping, leadership training, ART launches. Applies to large enterprises in software/IT; tools like Jira Align aid. Involves PI Planning, Inspect & Adapt; tailored for hybrid/distributed teams.

NIST 800-171 Details

What It Is

NIST SP 800-171 (Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations) is a U.S. federal framework providing security requirements for safeguarding Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) confidentiality. It applies to nonfederal systems processing, storing, or transmitting CUI, using a control-based approach tailored from NIST SP 800-53 Moderate baseline.

Key Components

17 families in Rev. 3 (e.g., Access Control, Audit, Supply Chain Risk Management), with ~97-110 requirements.
Core artifacts: System Security Plan (SSP) and Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M).
Built on FIPS 200; companion SP 800-171A for assessments via examine/interview/test.
Compliance via self-assessment or third-party (e.g., CMMC Level 2).

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for federal contractors via DFARS 252.204-7012.
Reduces breach risk, ensures contract eligibility, builds supply chain trust.
Enhances cybersecurity maturity, competitive edge in DoD procurement.

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping, gap analysis, controls, evidence, monitoring.
Applies to contractors handling CUI; suits all sizes with enclave scoping.
Audits via SPRS scoring; Rev. 3 current as of May 2024.

Key Differences

Aspect	SAFe	NIST 800-171
Scope	Scaling Agile for enterprise software/IT delivery	Protecting CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems
Industry	Software, IT ops, regulated sectors like finance/healthcare	Defense contractors, federal supply chain, DoD-focused
Nature	Voluntary framework with certifications	Mandatory via federal contracts like DFARS
Testing	PI Planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops, self-assessments	SPRS scoring, CMMC audits, examine/interview/test
Penalties	No legal penalties, implementation failure risks	Contract ineligibility, fines, debarment

Scope

SAFe

Scaling Agile for enterprise software/IT delivery

NIST 800-171

Protecting CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems

Industry

SAFe

Software, IT ops, regulated sectors like finance/healthcare

NIST 800-171

Defense contractors, federal supply chain, DoD-focused

Nature

SAFe

Voluntary framework with certifications

NIST 800-171

Mandatory via federal contracts like DFARS

Testing

SAFe

PI Planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops, self-assessments

NIST 800-171

SPRS scoring, CMMC audits, examine/interview/test

Penalties

SAFe

No legal penalties, implementation failure risks

NIST 800-171

Contract ineligibility, fines, debarment

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SAFe and NIST 800-171

SAFe FAQ

NIST 800-171 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization

Master NIST CSF implementation in your organization with this detailed guide. Learn core functions, key steps, best practices, and tips for cybersecurity succes

DORA Third-Party Risk Management: A Consultant’s Guide to Mapping Critical ICT Service Providers in 2026

Navigate DORA's complex third-party risk pillar. Step-by-step consultant guide to identify critical ICT providers, remediate Article 30 contracts, and build the

Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention

Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PRINCE2 vs J-SOX

Discover PRINCE2 vs J-SOX: Project governance mastery meets financial ICFR compliance. Unlock differences in principles, processes, risks & tailoring for superior control. Compare now!

FISMA vs ISO 27017

FISMA vs ISO 27017: Federal RMF & NIST controls meet cloud-specific security guidance. Uncover differences in compliance, shared responsibilities, pitfalls & strategies for agencies/CSPs. Secure data now!

ISO 45001 vs ISO 30301

Compare ISO 45001 vs ISO 30301: OH&S safety systems meet records management. Discover key differences, integration benefits, leadership roles & implementation roadmap for compliance success. Explore now!

SAFe

NIST 800-171

Quick Verdict

SAFe

Key Features

NIST 800-171

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SAFe Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

NIST 800-171 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SAFe FAQ

What is the primary objective of SAFe?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SAFe?

Does SAFe require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SAFe be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SAFe?

Can SAFe be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SAFe?

NIST 800-171 FAQ

What is the primary objective of NIST 800-171?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with NIST 800-171?

Does NIST 800-171 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for NIST 800-171 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with NIST 800-171?

Can NIST 800-171 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing NIST 800-171?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization

DORA Third-Party Risk Management: A Consultant’s Guide to Mapping Critical ICT Service Providers in 2026

Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PRINCE2 vs J-SOX

FISMA vs ISO 27017

ISO 45001 vs ISO 30301