SAMA CSF
Saudi regulatory framework for financial cybersecurity
ISO 28000
International standard for supply chain security management systems
Quick Verdict
SAMA CSF mandates cybersecurity maturity for Saudi financial institutions via self-assessments and audits, ensuring resilience against cyber threats. ISO 28000 offers voluntary certification for global supply chain security management, helping organizations reduce risks and gain market trust.
SAMA CSF
SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0
Key Features
- Six-level maturity model targeting Level 3 minimum
- Four core domains with detailed subdomains
- Principle-based risk management approach
- Mandatory for Saudi financial institutions
- Board oversight and independent CISO requirements
ISO 28000
ISO 28000:2022 Security management systems Requirements
Key Features
- Risk-based supply chain security assessment
- PDCA cycle for continual improvement
- HLS alignment for ISO integration
- Supplier and third-party governance
- Incident response and resilience plans
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
SAMA CSF Details
What It Is
SAMA Cyber Security Framework (CSF) Version 1.0 is a mandatory regulatory framework issued by the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority in May 2017. It prescribes principle-based, outcome-oriented cybersecurity controls for SAMA-regulated financial institutions, including banks, insurers, and payment providers. Its primary purpose is to ensure detection, resistance, response, and recovery from cyber threats via a risk-based approach and maturity model.
Key Components
- Four domains: Leadership & Governance, Risk Management & Compliance, Operations & Technology, Third-Party Security.
- Numerous subdomains with principles, objectives, and control considerations.
- Six-level Cyber Security Maturity Model (0-5), minimum Level 3 (structured/formalized).
- Self-assessment via questionnaire; aligns with NIST, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated compliance avoids penalties, audits, operational disruptions. Enhances resilience, reduces incident impacts, enables competitive differentiation, market access, efficiency via standardized controls. Builds stakeholder trust in Saudi's digital financial sector.
Implementation Overview
Phased program: initiation/gap analysis, risk assessment, design/roadmap, deployment, operations/monitoring, audit/improvement. Applies to all SAMA entities; requires board sponsorship, CISO, evidence for self-assessments/SAMA reviews. Iterative, multi-year for higher maturity.
ISO 28000 Details
What It Is
ISO 28000:2022 — Security and resilience — Security management systems — Requirements is an international management system standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a security management system (SMS) tailored to supply chain security. It employs a risk-based approach via the PDCA cycle and High Level Structure (HLS) for holistic protection of people, assets, and operations.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement
- Risk assessment/treatment, security policies, objectives, controls (physical, procedural, personnel)
- Supplier governance and incident response
- Certification model per ISO 28003 with audits
Why Organizations Use It
- Reduces disruptions, theft, sabotage risks
- Meets contractual/regulatory demands (e.g., C-TPAT equivalents)
- Lowers insurance costs, enables trade facilitation
- Boosts resilience, reputation, competitive bidding
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scoping, gap analysis, risk strategy, deployment, audits
- Scalable across sizes/industries (logistics, manufacturing)
- Involves mapping, training, supplier integration
- Optional third-party certification with surveillance
Key Differences
| Aspect | SAMA CSF | ISO 28000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity for financial sector info assets | Supply chain security management system |
| Industry | Saudi financial institutions only | All industries worldwide, supply chain focus |
| Nature | Mandatory regulatory framework | Voluntary international certification standard |
| Testing | Periodic self-assessments, SAMA audits | Internal audits, third-party certification |
| Penalties | Regulatory enforcement, fines, scrutiny | Loss of certification, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about SAMA CSF and ISO 28000
SAMA CSF FAQ
ISO 28000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026
Explore the shift from SOCs to AI-Native CDCs. Autonomous agents handle Tier 1 triage in 2026, empowering analysts for complex threats. Discover the future of c

Measuring CIS Controls v8.1 in the Real World: KPIs, Dashboards, and Automated Evidence for Continuous Assurance
Master CIS Controls v8.1 measurement with essential KPIs, executive-ready dashboards, and automated evidence collection for continuous assurance. Make complianc

Step-by-Step Implementation Guide to ISO 27701: Building a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) on Your ISO 27001 Foundation
Implement ISO 27701 on your ISO 27001 foundation with this actionable guide. Tackle PII controls, audit evidence, GDPR integration. Templates, checklists for 20
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
APRA CPS 234 vs ISO 27701
Compare APRA CPS 234 vs ISO 27701: Australia's cyber resilience standard vs global privacy mgmt. Unlock governance, controls, 3rd-party risks & compliance insights for finance. Read now!
ENERGY STAR vs 23 NYCRR 500
ENERGY STAR vs 23 NYCRR 500: Compare voluntary energy efficiency certification with NY's mandatory cybersecurity rules. Master compliance, cut costs & risks—unlock strategies now!
ISO 13485 vs AS9110C
Compare ISO 13485 vs AS9110C: Medical device QMS meets aerospace maintenance stds. Uncover risk mgmt, regulatory diffs & implementation tips for compliance. Boost your strategy now!