What is the primary objective of **SOC 2**?

**The primary objective of SOC 2 is to provide independent assurance on service organizations' controls relevant to the five Trust Services Criteria (TSC): Security (mandatory), Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy.** Developed by the AICPA, it evaluates controls via Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) under Security, addressing risks in data handling for SaaS and cloud providers through Type I (design at a point-in-time) or Type II (operating effectiveness over 3-12 months) reports.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SOC 2**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with SOC 2, as it is a voluntary AICPA framework driven by market demands from enterprise customers.** Service organizations like SaaS providers, cloud services, data centers, and fintech firms handling customer data pursue it professionally to meet vendor risk management requirements, shorten sales cycles, and demonstrate trust in RFPs and MSAs.

Does **SOC 2** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SOC 2 requires an external audit by an independent, AICPA-accredited CPA firm to issue Type I or Type II attestation reports.** Auditors assess control design (Type I) or design plus operating effectiveness (Type II) against TSC, producing reports with opinions (unqualified preferred), management assertions, system descriptions, and test results; no formal certification exists, only these restricted reports.

How often should an assessment for **SOC 2** be performed?

**SOC 2 assessments should be performed annually for Type II reports to cover full control cycles like penetration tests and backups.** Bridge letters from management extend validity for gaps up to three months, enabling continuous assurance without full re-audits between annual engagements.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SOC 2**?

**Non-compliance with SOC 2 results in no direct legal penalties, as it is voluntary, but leads to lost enterprise deals, extended sales cycles by 3-6 months, and heightened breach liability under contracts or laws like CCPA.** Enterprises disqualify vendors lacking Type II reports in RFPs, inflating CAC by 20-50% and risking reputational damage from publicized incidents.

An **SOC 2** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SOC 2 maps efficiently to frameworks like NIST CSF, GDPR, and HIPAA via AICPA-provided spreadsheets, with Security's CC1-CC9 aligning to 70%+ of ISO 27001 controls and GDPR articles.** This reduces redundancy, enabling unified evidence chains for multi-framework compliance in SaaS environments.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SOC 2**?

**The first step to implement SOC 2 is conducting a gap analysis and readiness assessment to scope systems, select TSC (Security mandatory plus relevant optionals), and map controls to CC1-CC9.** Engage a CPA firm early ($5-10K) for prioritization of ~85 controls, using automation tools like Vanta for evidence collection.

What is the primary objective of **AS9100**?

**AS9100 establishes a quality management system (QMS) for aviation, space, and defense organizations to ensure product safety, configuration integrity, and supply chain reliability.** It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements in Clauses 4–10, emphasizing operational controls like configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit parts prevention (8.1.4), and dual-layer risk management (6.1 enterprise risks; 8.1.1 operational risks).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9100**?

**AS9100 applies to organizations that design, develop, manufacture, or service aviation, space, and defense products.** It targets manufacturers, material suppliers, design centers, and quality support organizations; major OEMs and primes require certification for supplier qualification and visibility in the IAQG OASIS database. While voluntary, it is a contractual prerequisite across the ASD supply chain.

Does **AS9100** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9100 mandates third-party certification through accredited bodies via a two-stage audit process.** Stage 1 assesses documentation and readiness; Stage 2 verifies implementation and effectiveness. Certification is maintained with annual surveillance audits and recertification every three years, focusing on objective evidence of process conformity.

How often should an assessment for **AS9100** be performed?

**AS9100 requires internal audits at planned intervals based on risk, with management reviews at least annually.** Certification involves annual surveillance audits and full recertification every three years by accredited bodies; organizations must conduct internal audits covering all processes, using competent auditors per Clause 9.2.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9100**?

**Non-compliance with AS9100 risks certification suspension, loss of supplier status, and exclusion from OEM contracts.** It leads to major nonconformities requiring root-cause corrective actions (often 60–90 days), supply chain disqualification via OASIS, potential product recalls, and heightened liability from safety failures in configuration, counterfeit parts, or product safety controls.

Can **AS9100** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9100D aligns with ISO 9001:2015’s Annex SL 10-clause structure for integrated management systems.** Its process-based QMS (Clauses 4–10) supports mapping to standards sharing this framework, enabling combined risk management, audits, and performance evaluation while retaining aerospace-specific controls.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9100**?

**The first step is performing a gap analysis against AS9100D requirements to identify compliance gaps.** Assemble a cross-functional team to map current processes to Clauses 4–10, prioritize aerospace additions (e.g., Clause 8 controls), define QMS scope per 4.3, and create an implementation plan with timelines and resources.

SOC 2 vs AS9100

Standards Comparison

SOC 2

Voluntary

2010

AICPA framework for service organizations' security controls

AS9100

Mandatory

2016

Global standard for aerospace quality management systems.

Quick Verdict

SOC 2 provides cybersecurity assurance for service organizations via Trust Services Criteria audits, while AS9100 delivers quality management for aerospace with safety and configuration controls. Companies adopt SOC 2 for data trust and sales acceleration; AS9100 for supplier approval and safety compliance.

Cybersecurity / Trust

SOC 2

AICPA System and Organization Controls 2

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Mandatory Security TSC with CC1-CC9 controls
Type II reports test operational effectiveness over time
Flexible scoping of optional Trust Services Criteria
Independent CPA audits for credible attestation
Bridge letters extend report validity interim

Quality Management

AS9100

AS9100D Quality Management Systems for Aerospace

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Configuration management for product integrity
Product safety processes across lifecycle
Counterfeit parts prevention controls
Operational risk management in Clause 8
Enhanced supplier and supply chain controls

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary attestation framework developed by the AICPA for service organizations. It evaluates controls based on Trust Services Criteria (TSC), focusing on security (mandatory) and optional areas like availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. Its risk-based approach assesses design (Type I) and operational effectiveness (Type II) over 3-12 months.

Key Components

Five **TSCSecurity (CC1-CC9 common criteria), plus four optionals.
~85 controls typically mapped, with 2-3 redundants per CC point.
Built on COSO principles; 2023 updates refine points of focus.
CPA-led audits yield reports with opinions, assertions, and test results.

Why Organizations Use It

Builds enterprise trust, shortens sales cycles, unlocks deals.
Enhances cybersecurity posture, maps to NIST, GDPR, HIPAA.
Voluntary but market-driven for SaaS/cloud providers.
Reduces breach risks, signals maturity to stakeholders.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, control deployment, readiness audit, Type II monitoring.
Tools like Vanta/Secureframe automate evidence.
Targets service orgs (SaaS, data centers); annual recertification.
Costs $30K-$80K for Type II; 6-12 months typical.

AS9100 Details

What It Is

AS9100D (AS9100:2016) is a certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation, space, and defense. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, focusing on risk-based thinking, product safety, and supply chain integrity using a process-based, PDCA approach.

Key Components

10-clause Annex SL structure covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Aerospace additions: configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit prevention (8.1.4), operational risks, human factors, enhanced supplier controls.
Built on ISO 9001; requires third-party certification via IAQG-accredited audits.

Why Organizations Use It

**Market accessOften mandated by OEMs for supplier qualification.
**Risk reductionPrevents safety incidents, defects via traceability and controls.
**Efficiency gainsImproves delivery, cuts rework, boosts competitiveness.
Builds stakeholder trust through OASIS visibility and proven QMS.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, Stage 1/2 certification.
Applies to manufacturers, designers, MROs globally; 6-18 months typical.
Involves documentation, training, audits; sustained via surveillance.

Key Differences

Aspect	SOC 2	AS9100
Scope	Trust Services Criteria: Security, Availability, Confidentiality, etc.	Quality management with aerospace additions: configuration, safety, counterfeit
Industry	Service organizations (SaaS, cloud, data processors), global	Aviation, space, defense manufacturers/suppliers, global
Nature	Voluntary CPA attestation framework	Voluntary certification standard based on ISO 9001
Testing	Type I/II audits by independent CPAs, annual	Stage 1/2 audits by accredited CBs, annual surveillance, 3-year recert
Penalties	No legal penalties, loss of market trust/certification	No legal penalties, loss of certification/market access

Scope

SOC 2

Trust Services Criteria: Security, Availability, Confidentiality, etc.

AS9100

Quality management with aerospace additions: configuration, safety, counterfeit

Industry

SOC 2

Service organizations (SaaS, cloud, data processors), global

AS9100

Aviation, space, defense manufacturers/suppliers, global

Nature

SOC 2

Voluntary CPA attestation framework

AS9100

Voluntary certification standard based on ISO 9001

Testing

SOC 2

Type I/II audits by independent CPAs, annual

AS9100

Stage 1/2 audits by accredited CBs, annual surveillance, 3-year recert

Penalties

SOC 2

No legal penalties, loss of market trust/certification

AS9100

No legal penalties, loss of certification/market access

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SOC 2 and AS9100

SOC 2 FAQ

AS9100 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption

Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris

Top 10 Reasons CMMC Level 3 Certification Unlocks Competitive Edge for Primes Handling Critical DoD Programs

Discover top 10 reasons CMMC Level 3 certification unlocks competitive edge for DoD primes. Reduced APT risks, procurement prefs, NIST 800-172 compliance via v2

NIST CSF 2.0 Supply Chain Risk Management: Complete Playbook with Profiles, Tiers, and Vendor Assessment Templates

Master NIST CSF 2.0 ID.SC supply chain risk management with vendor assessment templates, profile gap analysis, and tier strategies. Mitigate third-party threats

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 22000 vs ISO 30301

Discover ISO 22000 vs ISO 30301: Compare FSMS for food safety and MSR for records governance. Unlock HLS integration, risk strategies, and compliance gains. Optimize now!

ISO 37301 vs CMMI

Compare ISO 37301 vs CMMI: Certifiable CMS for compliance risks meets maturity model for process excellence. Leadership, risk planning, audits drive gains. Choose now!

GRI vs Basel III

Discover GRI vs Basel III: Impact-driven sustainability reporting clashes with banking capital, leverage & liquidity rules. Unlock compliance strategies & key differences now!

SOC 2

AS9100

Quick Verdict

SOC 2

Key Features

AS9100

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

AS9100 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SOC 2 FAQ

What is the primary objective of SOC 2?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SOC 2?

Does SOC 2 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SOC 2 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SOC 2?

An SOC 2 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SOC 2?

AS9100 FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9100?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9100?

Does AS9100 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9100 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9100?

Can AS9100 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9100?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption

Top 10 Reasons CMMC Level 3 Certification Unlocks Competitive Edge for Primes Handling Critical DoD Programs

NIST CSF 2.0 Supply Chain Risk Management: Complete Playbook with Profiles, Tiers, and Vendor Assessment Templates

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 22000 vs ISO 30301

ISO 37301 vs CMMI

GRI vs Basel III