GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/SOC 2 vs AS9100
    Standards Comparison

    SOC 2 vs AS9100

    SOC 2

    Voluntary
    2010

    AICPA framework for service organizations' security controls

    VS

    AS9100

    Mandatory
    2016

    Global standard for aerospace quality management systems.

    Quick Verdict

    SOC 2 provides cybersecurity assurance for service organizations via Trust Services Criteria audits, while AS9100 delivers quality management for aerospace with safety and configuration controls. Companies adopt SOC 2 for data trust and sales acceleration; AS9100 for supplier approval and safety compliance.

    Cybersecurity / Trust

    SOC 2

    AICPA System and Organization Controls 2

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory Security TSC with CC1-CC9 controls
    • Type II reports test operational effectiveness over time
    • Flexible scoping of optional Trust Services Criteria
    • Independent CPA audits for credible attestation
    • Bridge letters extend report validity interim
    Quality Management

    AS9100

    AS9100D Quality Management Systems for Aerospace

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Configuration management for product integrity
    • Product safety processes across lifecycle
    • Counterfeit parts prevention controls
    • Operational risk management in Clause 8
    • Enhanced supplier and supply chain controls

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    SOC 2 Details

    What It Is

    SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary attestation framework developed by the AICPA for service organizations. It evaluates controls based on Trust Services Criteria (TSC), focusing on security (mandatory) and optional areas like availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. Its risk-based approach assesses design (Type I) and operational effectiveness (Type II) over 3-12 months.

    Key Components

    • Five **TSCSecurity (CC1-CC9 common criteria), plus four optionals.
    • ~85 controls typically mapped, with 2-3 redundants per CC point.
    • Built on COSO principles; 2023 updates refined points of focus.
    • CPA-led audits yield reports with opinions, assertions, and test results.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Builds enterprise trust, shortens sales cycles, unlocks deals.
    • Enhances cybersecurity posture, maps to NIST, GDPR, HIPAA.
    • Voluntary but market-driven for SaaS/cloud providers.
    • Reduces breach risks, signals maturity to stakeholders.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, control deployment, readiness audit, Type II monitoring.
    • Tools like Vanta/Secureframe automate evidence.
    • Targets service orgs (SaaS, data centers); annual recertification.
    • Costs $30K-$80K for Type II; 6-12 months typical.

    AS9100 Details

    What It Is

    AS9100D (AS9100:2016) is a certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation, space, and defense. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, focusing on risk-based thinking, product safety, and supply chain integrity using a process-based, PDCA approach.

    Key Components

    • 10-clause Annex SL structure covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
    • Aerospace additions: configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit prevention (8.1.4), operational risks, human factors, enhanced supplier controls.
    • Built on ISO 9001; requires third-party certification via IAQG-accredited audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • **Market accessOften mandated by OEMs for supplier qualification.
    • **Risk reductionPrevents safety incidents, defects via traceability and controls.
    • **Efficiency gainsImproves delivery, cuts rework, boosts competitiveness.
    • Builds stakeholder trust through OASIS visibility and proven QMS.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, Stage 1/2 certification.
    • Applies to manufacturers, designers, MROs globally; 6-18 months typical.
    • Involves documentation, training, audits; sustained via surveillance.

    Key Differences

    AspectSOC 2AS9100
    ScopeTrust Services Criteria: Security, Availability, Confidentiality, etc.Quality management with aerospace additions: configuration, safety, counterfeit
    IndustryService organizations (SaaS, cloud, data processors), globalAviation, space, defense manufacturers/suppliers, global
    NatureVoluntary CPA attestation frameworkVoluntary certification standard based on ISO 9001
    TestingType I/II audits by independent CPAs, annualStage 1/2 audits by accredited CBs, annual surveillance, 3-year recert
    PenaltiesNo legal penalties, loss of market trust/certificationNo legal penalties, loss of certification/market access

    Scope

    SOC 2
    Trust Services Criteria: Security, Availability, Confidentiality, etc.
    AS9100
    Quality management with aerospace additions: configuration, safety, counterfeit

    Industry

    SOC 2
    Service organizations (SaaS, cloud, data processors), global
    AS9100
    Aviation, space, defense manufacturers/suppliers, global

    Nature

    SOC 2
    Voluntary CPA attestation framework
    AS9100
    Voluntary certification standard based on ISO 9001

    Testing

    SOC 2
    Type I/II audits by independent CPAs, annual
    AS9100
    Stage 1/2 audits by accredited CBs, annual surveillance, 3-year recert

    Penalties

    SOC 2
    No legal penalties, loss of market trust/certification
    AS9100
    No legal penalties, loss of certification/market access

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about SOC 2 and AS9100

    SOC 2 FAQ

    AS9100 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Asset-Backed Issuers and SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Applicability, Disclosures, and Compliance Roadmap

    Asset-Backed Issuers and SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Applicability, Disclosures, and Compliance Roadmap

    How SEC cybersecurity rules apply to asset-backed issuers (ABS): Form 10-D disclosures, ABS-EE risk management, Inline XBRL tagging, exemptions. Roadmap for tru

    Cyber Essentials on a Shoestring: Filling the Microsoft 365 Security Gaps with Free and Low-Cost Tools

    Cyber Essentials on a Shoestring: Filling the Microsoft 365 Security Gaps with Free and Low-Cost Tools

    Close Cyber Essentials 2026 gaps in basic Microsoft 365 plans using free and low-cost tools. Achieve MFA, patching, and audit readiness without enterprise spend

    Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles

    Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles

    Transform NIST CSF 2.0 into quantifiable success: Define board-ready KPIs for Functions, build Profile dashboards, track Tier progression. Prove ROI amid cyber

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how SOC 2 and AS9100 compare against other standards

    Other SOC 2 Comparisons

    • SOC 2 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    • SOC 2 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • SOC 2 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • OSHA vs SOC 2
    • AEO vs SOC 2

    Other AS9100 Comparisons

    • AS9100 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • AS9100 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    • AS9100 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • IFS Food vs AS9100
    • AEO vs AS9100
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved