SOC 2 vs AS9100
SOC 2
AICPA framework for service organizations' security controls
AS9100
Global standard for aerospace quality management systems.
Quick Verdict
SOC 2 provides cybersecurity assurance for service organizations via Trust Services Criteria audits, while AS9100 delivers quality management for aerospace with safety and configuration controls. Companies adopt SOC 2 for data trust and sales acceleration; AS9100 for supplier approval and safety compliance.
SOC 2
AICPA System and Organization Controls 2
Key Features
- Mandatory Security TSC with CC1-CC9 controls
- Type II reports test operational effectiveness over time
- Flexible scoping of optional Trust Services Criteria
- Independent CPA audits for credible attestation
- Bridge letters extend report validity interim
AS9100
AS9100D Quality Management Systems for Aerospace
Key Features
- Configuration management for product integrity
- Product safety processes across lifecycle
- Counterfeit parts prevention controls
- Operational risk management in Clause 8
- Enhanced supplier and supply chain controls
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
SOC 2 Details
What It Is
SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary attestation framework developed by the AICPA for service organizations. It evaluates controls based on Trust Services Criteria (TSC), focusing on security (mandatory) and optional areas like availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. Its risk-based approach assesses design (Type I) and operational effectiveness (Type II) over 3-12 months.
Key Components
- Five **TSCSecurity (CC1-CC9 common criteria), plus four optionals.
- ~85 controls typically mapped, with 2-3 redundants per CC point.
- Built on COSO principles; 2023 updates refined points of focus.
- CPA-led audits yield reports with opinions, assertions, and test results.
Why Organizations Use It
- Builds enterprise trust, shortens sales cycles, unlocks deals.
- Enhances cybersecurity posture, maps to NIST, GDPR, HIPAA.
- Voluntary but market-driven for SaaS/cloud providers.
- Reduces breach risks, signals maturity to stakeholders.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, control deployment, readiness audit, Type II monitoring.
- Tools like Vanta/Secureframe automate evidence.
- Targets service orgs (SaaS, data centers); annual recertification.
- Costs $30K-$80K for Type II; 6-12 months typical.
AS9100 Details
What It Is
AS9100D (AS9100:2016) is a certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation, space, and defense. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, focusing on risk-based thinking, product safety, and supply chain integrity using a process-based, PDCA approach.
Key Components
- 10-clause Annex SL structure covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- Aerospace additions: configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit prevention (8.1.4), operational risks, human factors, enhanced supplier controls.
- Built on ISO 9001; requires third-party certification via IAQG-accredited audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- **Market accessOften mandated by OEMs for supplier qualification.
- **Risk reductionPrevents safety incidents, defects via traceability and controls.
- **Efficiency gainsImproves delivery, cuts rework, boosts competitiveness.
- Builds stakeholder trust through OASIS visibility and proven QMS.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, Stage 1/2 certification.
- Applies to manufacturers, designers, MROs globally; 6-18 months typical.
- Involves documentation, training, audits; sustained via surveillance.
Key Differences
| Aspect | SOC 2 | AS9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Trust Services Criteria: Security, Availability, Confidentiality, etc. | Quality management with aerospace additions: configuration, safety, counterfeit |
| Industry | Service organizations (SaaS, cloud, data processors), global | Aviation, space, defense manufacturers/suppliers, global |
| Nature | Voluntary CPA attestation framework | Voluntary certification standard based on ISO 9001 |
| Testing | Type I/II audits by independent CPAs, annual | Stage 1/2 audits by accredited CBs, annual surveillance, 3-year recert |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, loss of market trust/certification | No legal penalties, loss of certification/market access |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about SOC 2 and AS9100
SOC 2 FAQ
AS9100 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Asset-Backed Issuers and SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Applicability, Disclosures, and Compliance Roadmap
How SEC cybersecurity rules apply to asset-backed issuers (ABS): Form 10-D disclosures, ABS-EE risk management, Inline XBRL tagging, exemptions. Roadmap for tru

Cyber Essentials on a Shoestring: Filling the Microsoft 365 Security Gaps with Free and Low-Cost Tools
Close Cyber Essentials 2026 gaps in basic Microsoft 365 plans using free and low-cost tools. Achieve MFA, patching, and audit readiness without enterprise spend

Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles
Transform NIST CSF 2.0 into quantifiable success: Define board-ready KPIs for Functions, build Profile dashboards, track Tier progression. Prove ROI amid cyber
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Explore More Comparisons
See how SOC 2 and AS9100 compare against other standards