What is the primary objective of **SOC 2**?

**The primary objective of SOC 2 is to provide independent attestation that a service organization's controls meet the Trust Services Criteria (TSC) for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.** Developed by the AICPA, SOC 2 evaluates systems handling customer data, with **Security (CC1-CC9)** mandatory. Type 2 reports assess design and operating effectiveness over 3-12 months, delivering assurance to stakeholders via CPA audits.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SOC 2**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with SOC 2, as it is a voluntary AICPA framework; however, service organizations like SaaS, cloud, and data processors face professional mandates from enterprise clients.** Targeted at providers storing, processing, or transmitting customer data, it's essential for vendor risk assessments, RFPs, and MSAs where 70-80% of deals demand Type 2 reports.

Oes **SOC 2** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SOC 2 requires an external audit by an independent AICPA-accredited CPA firm to issue Type 1 or Type 2 reports.** Type 1 verifies control design at a point in time; Type 2 tests operating effectiveness over a period, including evidence sampling like logs and penetration tests. No formal certification exists—reports provide the attestation.

How often should an assessment for **SOC 2** be performed?

**SOC 2 Type 2 assessments should be performed annually to capture a full monitoring period of 3-12 months.** Bridge letters from management extend validity up to 3 months between audits, confirming no material changes. Continuous monitoring ensures ongoing evidence for recertification.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SOC 2**?

**Non-compliance with client-mandated SOC 2 results in deal disqualification, extended sales cycles (3-6 months), and heightened breach liability exceeding $1M per incident.** No AICPA fines apply, but operational risks include lost revenue, reputational damage, and custom contract clauses inflating CAC by 20-50%.

An **SOC 2** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SOC 2 maps effectively to frameworks like ISO 27001 (80% control overlap), NIST CSF, and others via AICPA spreadsheets.** Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) align with ISO Annex A and NIST categories, enabling multi-compliance efficiency without dual audits, particularly for Security controls.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SOC 2**?

**The first step to implement SOC 2 is a scoping exercise and gap analysis against the Trust Services Criteria, engaging a CPA for readiness assessment.** Define in-scope systems, data flows, and TSC (Security mandatory), inventory assets, and prioritize 50-100 controls like IAM and logging using tools like Vanta.

What is the primary objective of **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C's primary objective is to define quality management system requirements for aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) organizations to ensure consistent conformity of products and services to customer and regulatory requirements.** It builds on ISO 9001:2015 using the High Level Structure (HLS), embedding aerospace-specific controls for configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, maintenance release, and risk-based thinking (RBT) across Clauses 4–10 to support continuing airworthiness and supply-chain readiness via IAQG OASIS listing.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C applies to MRO organizations providing maintenance, repair, overhaul, or continuing airworthiness services for commercial, private, and military aircraft.** Target entities include independent repair stations, airline maintenance departments, component overhaul facilities, and OEM MRO divisions; compliance is professionally required by customers, OEMs, and regulators (e.g., FAA/EASA Part-145 alignments) for contract eligibility and OASIS approval, with no employee/revenue thresholds specified.

Does **AS9110C** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9110C requires third-party certification through accredited registrars following a two-stage external audit process.** Stage 1 reviews documentation and readiness; Stage 2 verifies effective QMS implementation via on-site evidence of operational cycles, internal audits, and management review (with at least three months of data). Certification is listed on IAQG OASIS, with surveillance audits annually and recertification every three years.

How often should an assessment for **AS9110C** be performed?

**Internal audits for AS9110C must be performed at planned intervals based on process risk, with critical maintenance processes (e.g., configuration control, release-to-service) audited more frequently.** Management reviews occur regularly, tied to business cycles with sufficient data; full internal audit cycles and one management review (after 3+ months of QMS operation) are prerequisites before external certification, followed by annual surveillance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9110C**?

**Non-compliance with AS9110C risks regulatory sanctions, contract loss, and operational shutdowns in safety-critical MRO environments.** Consequences include FAA/EASA Part-145 certificate suspension, fines up to $100k/day, liquidated damages from airline contracts, litigation from airworthiness failures, and exclusion from OEM bids/OASIS, potentially causing multimillion-dollar revenue losses and reputational damage.

An **AS9110C** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9110C uses ISO 9001:2015's HLS (Annex SL) for seamless mapping to aligned frameworks via shared Clauses 4–10 structure.** IAQG provides correlation matrices linking AS9110C to regulatory requirements (e.g., EASA/FAA Part-145), enabling integrated QMS without duplication while prioritizing statutory/regulatory overrides.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9110C**?

**The first step for AS9110C implementation is a disciplined gap analysis mapping existing processes to all clauses using IAQG checklists.** Conduct evidence-based review (desk audit plus process observations), prioritize high-risk gaps (e.g., counterfeit prevention, RBT per Clauses 6.1/8.1.1), define QMS scope with regulatory mapping, and produce a phased SOW with executive sponsorship.

SOC 2 vs AS9110C

Standards Comparison

SOC 2

Voluntary

2010

AICPA framework for service organizations' security controls

AS9110C

Mandatory

2016

Aerospace QMS standard for aircraft maintenance, repair, overhaul

Quick Verdict

SOC 2 provides voluntary trust services audits for tech service data security, while AS9110C mandates QMS certification for aerospace MRO airworthiness. Tech firms adopt SOC 2 for enterprise sales; aviation orgs pursue AS9110C for regulatory compliance and contracts.

Cybersecurity / Trust

SOC 2

System and Organization Controls 2

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Trust Services Criteria with mandatory Security
Type 2 audits verify operating effectiveness over time
Independent CPA firm attestation reports
Flexible scoping for relevant criteria
Tailored for service organizations' data controls

Quality Management

AS9110C

AS9110C Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Risk-based thinking integrated into planning and operations
Counterfeit parts prevention and detection controls
Configuration management and traceability requirements
Maintenance release and airworthiness verification
Human factors training and competence matrices

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). It provides independent assurance on service organizations' controls related to customer data via **Trust Services Criteria (TSC)Security (mandatory), Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy. The approach is control-based and risk-oriented, emphasizing design and operational effectiveness.

Key Components

Five TSC, with Security (CC1-CC9 Common Criteria) required; others optional based on services.
Typically 50-100 controls across policies, technical measures, and monitoring.
Built on COSO principles for control environments.
Type 1 (point-in-time design) and Type 2 (operating effectiveness over 3-12 months) CPA-attested reports.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives enterprise sales by streamlining due diligence and RFPs.
Mitigates breach risks, enhances resilience amid client mandates.
Builds trust with stakeholders, investors; competitive moat for SaaS/cloud firms.
Voluntary yet market-driven, overlaps with ISO 27001, NIST, GDPR.

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping/gap analysis, control deployment, 3+ month monitoring, CPA audit.
Suits SaaS, fintech, any size; tools like Vanta automate.
Annual Type 2 recertification with bridge letters for continuity.

AS9110C Details

What It Is

AS9110C is the international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) organizations. It extends ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements, focusing on safety-critical processes like configuration management and airworthiness. It employs a risk-based thinking (RBT) approach via the High Level Structure (HLS) and PDCA cycle.

Key Components

Core clauses (4-10) covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Aviation additions: counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, traceability, release controls.
Built on ISO 9001 with ~30 supplemental MRO requirements.
Certification via accredited registrars with internal audits and management reviews.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets airline/OEM contracts and regulatory alignments (FAA/EASA Part-145).
Mitigates safety risks, reduces rework, ensures traceability.
Boosts market access, customer trust, operational efficiency (5-12% cost savings).

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, pilot, rollout, certification.
Applies to MROs globally; 6-12 months typical.
Requires training, eQMS, audits; operational evidence mandatory pre-certification.

Key Differences

Aspect	SOC 2	AS9110C
Scope	Trust Services Criteria: security, availability, confidentiality, privacy, processing integrity	Aerospace MRO QMS: maintenance processes, configuration, counterfeit prevention, airworthiness
Industry	SaaS, cloud, tech service organizations worldwide	Aviation maintenance, repair, overhaul organizations globally
Nature	Voluntary AICPA audit framework	Certification standard based on ISO 9001:2015
Testing	Type 1/2 CPA audits over 3-12 months	Internal audits, management reviews, registrar Stage 1/2 certification
Penalties	Market exclusion, lost deals, no legal fines	Regulatory sanctions, contract loss, certification revocation

Scope

SOC 2

Trust Services Criteria: security, availability, confidentiality, privacy, processing integrity

AS9110C

Aerospace MRO QMS: maintenance processes, configuration, counterfeit prevention, airworthiness

Industry

SOC 2

SaaS, cloud, tech service organizations worldwide

AS9110C

Aviation maintenance, repair, overhaul organizations globally

Nature

SOC 2

Voluntary AICPA audit framework

AS9110C

Certification standard based on ISO 9001:2015

Testing

SOC 2

Type 1/2 CPA audits over 3-12 months

AS9110C

Internal audits, management reviews, registrar Stage 1/2 certification

Penalties

SOC 2

Market exclusion, lost deals, no legal fines

AS9110C

Regulatory sanctions, contract loss, certification revocation

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SOC 2 and AS9110C

SOC 2 FAQ

AS9110C FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The SOC Maturity Roadmap: A 5-Step Blueprint for Scaling from Ad-Hoc to Optimized Operations

Unlock SOC excellence with our 5-step maturity roadmap. Compare SOC-CMM, NIST CSF, and CMMC frameworks to scale from ad-hoc to automated operations. Start your

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity

Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier

CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers

Calculate realistic CMMC costs for Levels 1-3: self-assessments, C3PAO fees, tooling, remediation & ROI. Interactive tool for small DIB suppliers. Get benchmark

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CMMC vs WELL

CMMC vs WELL: Compare DoD cybersecurity (NIST 800-171/172 levels) with health standards (10 concepts, preconditions). Implementation, costs, pitfalls—choose wisely for compliance edge.

ISO 31000 vs SQF

Compare ISO 31000 vs SQF: Risk guidelines meet food safety certification. Discover principles, frameworks & implementation for compliance, resilience. Choose wisely now.

DORA vs K-PIPA

Dive into DORA vs K-PIPA: EU finance resilience vs Korea's data privacy powerhouse. Compare scopes, penalties, testing & breaches. Master global compliance now.

SOC 2

AS9110C

Quick Verdict

SOC 2

Key Features

AS9110C

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

AS9110C Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SOC 2 FAQ

What is the primary objective of SOC 2?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SOC 2?

Oes SOC 2 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SOC 2 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SOC 2?

An SOC 2 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SOC 2?

AS9110C FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9110C?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9110C?

Does AS9110C require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9110C be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9110C?

An AS9110C be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9110C?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The SOC Maturity Roadmap: A 5-Step Blueprint for Scaling from Ad-Hoc to Optimized Operations

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity

CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CMMC vs WELL

ISO 31000 vs SQF

DORA vs K-PIPA