SOC 2
AICPA framework for Trust Services Criteria compliance
EN 1090
EU standard for steel and aluminium structural execution
Quick Verdict
SOC 2 provides voluntary trust assurance for tech service data security globally, while EN 1090 mandates CE marking for structural steel/aluminium components in EU construction. Tech firms adopt SOC 2 for enterprise sales; fabricators need EN 1090 for legal market access.
SOC 2
System and Organization Controls 2
EN 1090
EN 1090 Execution of steel and aluminium structures
Key Features
- Risk-based Execution Classes EXC1-EXC4
- Factory Production Control FPC certification
- CE marking and DoP requirements
- Welding quality via ISO 3834
- Material traceability and NDT inspection
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
SOC 2 Details
What It Is
SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary audit framework developed by the AICPA to evaluate service organizations' controls over customer data. It uses Trust Services Criteria (TSC)—a principles-based, risk-focused approach assessing security and operations.
Key Components
- Five TSC: Security (mandatory, CC1-CC9), Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy (optional).
- 50-100 controls mapped to criteria, with redundancy (2-3 per point).
- Built on COSO principles; Type 1 (design) and Type 2 (operating effectiveness) reports by CPA auditors.
Why Organizations Use It
- Accelerates enterprise sales, unlocks markets like SaaS/cloud.
- Builds stakeholder trust, reduces breach risks/liability.
- Competitive moat via 15-30% faster close rates, ROI in 3-6 months.
- Overlaps with ISO 27001 (80%), HIPAA, GDPR for efficiency.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis (2-4 weeks), deployment (4-8 weeks), monitoring (3-12 months), audit (1-2 months).
- Targets SaaS/fintech (10-500+ employees); automation (Vanta) cuts effort 70%.
- Annual Type 2 recertification with bridge letters. (178 words)
EN 1090 Details
What It Is
EN 1090 is a harmonized European standard family (EN 1090-1, -2, -3) for the execution and conformity assessment of structural steel and aluminium components under the Construction Products Regulation (CPR). Its primary purpose is ensuring safe fabrication, assembly, and market placement via CE marking. It employs a risk-based approach through Execution Classes (EXC1–EXC4).
Key Components
- **EN 1090-1Conformity assessment, Factory Production Control (FPC), Declaration of Performance (DoP).
- **EN 1090-2/-3Technical rules for steel/aluminium (welding, tolerances, corrosion protection, inspection).
- Core principles: traceability, welding quality (ISO 3834), NDT scaled by EXC.
- Certification model: Notified Body audits FPC with ongoing surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for EU market access with CE marking.
- Reduces liability, rework; enables high-risk projects.
- Builds trust via certified quality and traceability.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, FPC build, personnel training, NB certification. Applies to fabricators in construction; 6-12 months typical for medium firms.
Key Differences
| Aspect | SOC 2 | EN 1090 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Data security, availability, privacy for service orgs | Structural steel/aluminium fabrication and conformity |
| Industry | SaaS, cloud, tech services globally | Construction, manufacturing in EU/EEA |
| Nature | Voluntary AICPA audit framework | Mandatory harmonized standard under CPR |
| Testing | Type 2 audits over 3-12 months by CPA | FPC certification, surveillance by Notified Body |
| Penalties | Lost business, no legal fines | Market exclusion, fines, legal liability |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about SOC 2 and EN 1090
SOC 2 FAQ
EN 1090 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts
Advanced compliance tools use AI, analytics & real-time monitoring to predict regulatory shifts, cut non-compliance costs 3x, and ensure audit readiness. Stay p
ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide for Extending Your ISO 27001 ISMS to PIMS
Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS with this step-by-step roadmap. Master role-specific controls, avoid pitfalls, meet certification evidence needs for pri
The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability
Gain unprecedented organizational visibility with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time alerts, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 adherence, reduce risks, and
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
C-TPAT vs ISO 27017
Compare C-TPAT vs ISO 27017: Supply chain security vs cloud controls. Discover key differences, benefits & which fits your compliance needs. Optimize risk now!
EMAS vs ISO 56002
Unlock EMAS vs ISO 56002: EU's verified eco-management powerhouse meets innovation system guidance. Compare compliance, performance gains & strategy. Choose your edge now!
Australian Privacy Act vs NERC CIP
Discover Australian Privacy Act vs NERC CIP: principles-based privacy vs grid cyber standards. Compare compliance, enforcement & strategies for resilient ops. Act now!