What is the primary objective of **SOC 2**?

**The primary objective of SOC 2 is to provide independent attestation that a service organization's controls meet the Trust Services Criteria (TSC) for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.** Developed by the AICPA, SOC 2 evaluates systems handling customer data, with Security (CC1-CC9) as the mandatory common criteria. Type 2 reports assess design and operating effectiveness over 3-12 months, delivering assurance to stakeholders like enterprise clients.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SOC 2**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with SOC 2, as it is a voluntary AICPA framework, but service organizations are professionally compelled by enterprise customer demands.** It targets SaaS, cloud, fintech, and data processors storing, processing, or transmitting customer data. Enterprises mandate Type 2 reports in RFPs and MSAs, disqualifying non-compliant vendors and extending sales cycles by 3-6 months.

Does **SOC 2** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SOC 2 requires an external audit by an independent AICPA-accredited CPA firm to issue Type 1 or Type 2 attestation reports.** Type 1 verifies control design at a point in time; Type 2 tests operating effectiveness over a period via sampling, evidence review, and tests like penetration testing. No formal certification exists—reports provide the assurance.

How often should an assessment for **SOC 2** be performed?

**SOC 2 Type 2 assessments should be performed annually to capture a full review period and maintain trust.** The audit covers 3-12 months of operations, with bridge letters extending validity up to 3 months. Continuous monitoring ensures evidence for recertification, aligning with enterprise VRM cycles.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SOC 2**?

**Non-compliance with client-mandated SOC 2 results in deal disqualification, extended sales cycles, and heightened breach liability, though no direct AICPA fines apply.** Enterprises reject vendors without Type 2 reports, inflating CAC by 20-50%; breaches without controls trigger SLA penalties exceeding $1M, litigation, and reputational damage delaying funding.

An **SOC 2** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SOC 2 controls map extensively to frameworks like ISO 27001 (80% overlap), NIST CSF, and others via AICPA spreadsheets.** Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) align with ISO Annex A controls, enabling shared evidence for multi-compliance without dual audits. This reduces redundancy for global SaaS providers pursuing hybrid programs.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SOC 2**?

**The first step to implement SOC 2 is a scoping exercise and gap analysis against the Trust Services Criteria.** Define in-scope systems, data flows, and TSC (starting with mandatory Security), then engage a CPA for readiness assessment ($5-10K). Inventory assets and map 50-100 controls using tools like Vanta for prioritized remediation.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 26000**?

**ISO 26000 provides international guidance on social responsibility to help organizations integrate sustainable practices into their operations.** Published in November 2010 and confirmed current in 2021, it defines social responsibility as accountability for impacts on society and the environment through transparent, ethical behavior that contributes to sustainable development, respects stakeholder expectations, complies with law, aligns with international norms, and embeds SR throughout the organization.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 26000**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 26000, as it is voluntary guidance applicable to all types regardless of size, location, or sector.** It targets private, public, and non-profit entities—including SMEs, multinationals, hospitals, schools, and charities—to assess and address SR impacts via its seven principles and core subjects through contextual stakeholder engagement.

Oes **ISO 26000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 26000 explicitly prohibits external audits or third-party certification.** Clause 1 states it is not a management system standard, contains no requirements, and any certification claims constitute misrepresentation or misuse; organizations should self-assess, report transparently using the ISO 26000 Communication Protocol, and align with external reporting frameworks for credibility.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 26000** be performed?

**ISO 26000 recommends periodic self-assessments at appropriate intervals aligned with organizational context and stakeholder needs.** It emphasizes ongoing stakeholder engagement (Clause 5) and integration (Clause 7), with reporting on objectives, achievements, shortfalls, and improvements; frequency depends on materiality, risks, and changes, typically annually or tied to management reviews.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 26000**?

**There are no direct legal consequences for non-compliance with ISO 26000, as it imposes no enforceable requirements.** Indirect risks include reputational damage, stakeholder distrust, lost market access, or misalignment with international norms (e.g., human rights due diligence), potentially amplifying exposure to sector-specific regulations or investor scrutiny without SR integration.

An **ISO 26000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 26000 aligns with international frameworks including OECD Guidelines, UN Global Compact, GRI, and UN SDGs.** ISO provides linkage documents (e.g., ISO-OECD, ISO-SDGs) and IWA 26:2017 for integration into management systems; it complements these by offering principles-based SR guidance on core subjects like human rights and environment.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 26000**?

**The first step is recognizing social responsibility and engaging stakeholders per Clause 5.** Organizations must understand their impacts, identify relevant issues across the seven core subjects, map stakeholders, and prioritize through dialogue to determine significance, forming the basis for integration throughout governance and operations.

SOC 2 vs ISO 26000

Standards Comparison

SOC 2

Voluntary

2010

Voluntary framework auditing service organizations' security controls

ISO 26000

Voluntary

2010

International guidance standard for social responsibility.

Quick Verdict

SOC 2 provides audited controls for data security in tech services, while ISO 26000 offers non-certifiable guidance on broad social responsibility. Tech firms adopt SOC 2 for enterprise trust; all organizations use ISO 26000 for ethical governance and sustainability.

Cybersecurity / Trust

SOC 2

System and Organization Controls 2

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Type 2 reports test operating effectiveness over time
Mandatory Security criterion plus four optional TSCs
Independent CPA firm attestation for trust assurance
Flexible scoping for service organizations' data handling
Principles-based controls mapped to NIST and ISO

Social Responsibility

ISO 26000

ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Seven core subjects spanning governance to community development
Seven principles underpinning ethical decision-making
Non-certifiable guidance applicable to all organizations
Stakeholder engagement for issue prioritization
Integration with management systems like ISO 14001

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary audit framework developed by the AICPA to evaluate service organizations' controls over customer data. It uses Trust Services Criteria (TSC)—a principles-based, risk-focused approach assessing design (Type 1) and operating effectiveness (Type 2) for security and operations.

Key Components

Five TSC: Security (mandatory, CC1-CC9 common criteria), Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy.
50-100 controls mapped to criteria, with redundancy (2-3 per point).
Built on COSO principles; CPA attestation model with unqualified opinions ideal.

Why Organizations Use It

Accelerates enterprise sales, reduces due diligence friction by 80-90%.
Mitigates breach risks, builds stakeholder trust for SaaS/cloud providers.
Voluntary but market-mandated; competitive moat unlocking higher ACV deals.
Overlaps with ISO 27001, NIST, GDPR for efficiency.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis (2-4 weeks), control deployment (4-8 weeks), 3-12 month monitoring, CPA audit. Targets SaaS/fintech (10-500+ employees); automation tools like Vanta cut efforts 70%. Annual Type 2 recertification required.

ISO 26000 Details

What It Is

ISO 26000:2010 is an international guidance standard on social responsibility, providing a voluntary framework for organizations to address impacts on society and environment. Its primary purpose is to promote sustainable development through transparent, ethical behavior. The approach is principles-based and holistic, emphasizing context-specific application via stakeholder engagement.

Key Components

**Seven principlesAccountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for stakeholder interests, rule of law, international norms, human rights.
**Seven core subjectsOrganizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement.
No fixed controls; guidance for integration. Non-certifiable—focuses on self-assessment and reporting.

Why Organizations Use It

Enhances risk management, resilience, and ESG alignment.
Builds stakeholder trust, supports SDG compliance, improves reputation.
Drives efficiency, talent retention, market access without certification burdens.

Implementation Overview

Phased: materiality assessment, stakeholder engagement, policy integration, training, reporting.
Applies to all sizes, sectors, geographies. No audits required; uses PDCA cycles and tools like ISO Communication Protocol.

Key Differences

Aspect	SOC 2	ISO 26000
Scope	Security, availability, confidentiality, privacy, processing integrity	Governance, human rights, labor, environment, fair practices, consumers, community
Industry	SaaS, cloud, tech service organizations globally	All organizations, sectors, sizes worldwide
Nature	Voluntary AICPA audit standard, Type 1/2 reports	Voluntary non-certifiable guidance standard
Testing	CPA audits, Type 2 operating effectiveness over 3-12 months	Self-assessment, no formal audits or certification
Penalties	No legal penalties, lost business and trust	No penalties, reputational and market risks only

Scope

SOC 2

Security, availability, confidentiality, privacy, processing integrity

ISO 26000

Governance, human rights, labor, environment, fair practices, consumers, community

Industry

SOC 2

SaaS, cloud, tech service organizations globally

ISO 26000

All organizations, sectors, sizes worldwide

Nature

SOC 2

Voluntary AICPA audit standard, Type 1/2 reports

ISO 26000

Voluntary non-certifiable guidance standard

Testing

SOC 2

CPA audits, Type 2 operating effectiveness over 3-12 months

ISO 26000

Self-assessment, no formal audits or certification

Penalties

SOC 2

No legal penalties, lost business and trust

ISO 26000

No penalties, reputational and market risks only

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SOC 2 and ISO 26000

SOC 2 FAQ

ISO 26000 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages

Uncover top 5 unseen complexities modern compliance software manages effortlessly—from sensitive data mapping to real-time regulatory shifts. Automate audits, i

Top 5 Audit Survival Secrets for Your First SOC 2 Type 2: What Auditors Really Check (and How to Pass)

Master your first SOC 2 Type 2 audit with proven strategies: 40-sample testing, vendor gaps, CPA walkthroughs. Get checklists, scripts & tips from SignWell to s

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 31000 vs ISO 19600

Compare ISO 31000 vs ISO 19600: Risk guidelines vs compliance systems. Uncover principles, frameworks & processes to integrate risk mgmt & boost resilience. Explore now!

WCAG vs WELL

Discover WCAG vs WELL: Web accessibility standard (POUR, AA conformance) meets building health cert (Air, Light, Mind). Compare for compliance wins. Dive in now!

Six Sigma vs CCPA

Six Sigma vs CCPA: Compare process excellence methodology with CA privacy law. Key differences, compliance strategies, implementation tips for business success. Dive in!

SOC 2

ISO 26000

Quick Verdict

SOC 2

Key Features

ISO 26000

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 26000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SOC 2 FAQ

What is the primary objective of SOC 2?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SOC 2?

Does SOC 2 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SOC 2 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SOC 2?

An SOC 2 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SOC 2?

ISO 26000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 26000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 26000?

Oes ISO 26000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 26000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 26000?

An ISO 26000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 26000?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages

Top 5 Audit Survival Secrets for Your First SOC 2 Type 2: What Auditors Really Check (and How to Pass)

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 31000 vs ISO 19600

WCAG vs WELL

Six Sigma vs CCPA