What is the primary objective of **SQF**?

**The primary objective of SQF is to provide a rigorous, HACCP-based food safety and quality management system that assures consistent production of safe food products across the supply chain.** Administered by the SQF Institute (SQFI), it integrates **Module 2 System Elements** (management commitment, HACCP plans, verification) with sector-specific Good Practices modules (e.g., **Module 11** for food manufacturing GMPs), enabling GFSI-benchmarked certification for over 14,000 sites in 40+ countries.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SQF**?

**SQF compliance is not legally mandated but is a professional requirement for food suppliers seeking approval from major retailers, brand owners, and foodservice providers worldwide.** It applies to organizations in food manufacturing (**Module 2 + Module 11**), storage/distribution, primary production, packaging, pet food, and supplements, based on **Food Sector Categories (FSCs)**; sites must designate a full-time, on-site **SQF Practitioner** competent in HACCP.

Does **SQF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SQF requires annual external audits by SQFI-licensed Certification Bodies (CBs) accredited to ISO/IEC 17065, culminating in third-party certification.** Initial certification, surveillance, and recertification audits (with unannounced audits every 3 years) score sites (E: 96–100, G: 86–95, C: 70–85, F: <70), grading nonconformities (minor: 1 pt, major: 5 pts, critical: 50 pts); certificates are publicly listed in the SQFI directory.

How often should an assessment for **SQF** be performed?

**SQF requires annual external certification audits, supplemented by routine internal audits and management reviews.** **Internal audits** (mandatory under 2.5.5) cover all elements at least annually; **management reviews** occur annually with monthly **SQF Practitioner** updates; validation/verification (2.5.1–2.5.2) and crisis/recall tests happen yearly, plus ongoing monitoring of PRPs like sanitation and pest control.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SQF**?

**Non-compliance with SQF results in audit failure, certification denial/suspension, and loss of GFSI-recognized status, blocking market access to retailers requiring it.** Critical nonconformities (e.g., uncontrolled hazards) trigger immediate suspension; major/minor require corrective actions within 30 days; repeated failures lead to decertification, increased buyer audits, recall risks, and commercial exclusion from supply chains.

Can **SQF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SQF maps to other GFSI-benchmarked frameworks through shared HACCP principles, management systems, and preventive controls.** Its **Module 2** elements (document control, CAPA, internal audits, traceability) align with common structures, allowing layering of **SQF Quality Code** atop existing GFSI programs; however, site-specific tailoring via FSCs ensures no direct clause-for-clause equivalence.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SQF**?

**The first step to implement SQF is to register the site in the SQFI assessment database and designate a full-time, HACCP-trained SQF Practitioner (2.1.2).** Follow with a gap assessment against **Edition 9** (effective May 2021), select applicable modules (e.g., **Module 2 + 11**), and develop the food safety policy signed by senior management.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 27017**?

**ISO 27017 provides cloud-specific implementation guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls plus 7 additional cloud-focused controls (CLD.6.3.1, CLD.8.1.5, CLD.9.5.1, CLD.9.5.2, CLD.12.1.5, CLD.12.4.5, CLD.13.1.4).** Published in 2015, it addresses shared responsibilities between **cloud service providers (CSPs)** and **cloud service customers (CSCs)**, covering multi-tenancy segregation, virtual machine hardening, asset removal/return, administrative operations, customer monitoring, and network alignment in public, private, and hybrid clouds.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 27017**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 27017, as it is a voluntary code of practice.** Professionally, **CSPs** and **CSCs** with significant cloud footprints adopt it to demonstrate due diligence, especially in regulated sectors or procurement demanding cloud security assurance; ~94% of organizations use cloud services, with 61% reporting incidents, driving its use within ISO 27001 ISMS.

Does **ISO 27017** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 27017 does not support standalone third-party certification or require external audits.** It is implemented within an **ISO 27001 ISMS**, with auditors assessing its 37+7 controls during ISO 27001 Stage 1/2 audits; certification bodies may reference ISO 27017 conformity as an extension on the ISO 27001 certificate.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 27017** be performed?

**ISO 27017 assessments occur as part of annual ISO 27001 surveillance audits and triennial re-certification.** Continuous monitoring of cloud controls (e.g., configurations, logging) is required via risk-based reviews, with full re-assessments triggered by significant changes like new services or the forthcoming 2025 revision.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 27017**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 27017 carries no direct legal penalties, as it is non-mandatory.** Indirect risks include failed ISO 27001 audits, lost procurement opportunities, regulatory scrutiny for cloud incidents (e.g., misconfigurations in 61% of cases), reputational damage, and heightened breach exposure from unaddressed multi-tenancy or shared responsibility gaps.

Can **ISO 27017** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 27017 maps directly to ISO 27001/27002 controls and aligns with frameworks like NIST SP 800-53 and CSA STAR via its 37+7 controls.** **CSPs** (70%) map it for cross-compliance; it integrates into ISMS for multi-framework coverage, including FedRAMP baselines and PCI-DSS shared models, reducing audit duplication.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 27017**?

**Conduct a cloud-specific risk assessment within your ISO 27001 ISMS scope.** Identify threats (e.g., multi-tenancy, asset lifecycle), select applicable 37 ISO 27002 + 7 CLD controls, update the Statement of Applicability, and document shared CSP/CSC responsibilities per CLD.6.3.1.

SQF vs ISO 27017

Q: How often should an assessment for **SQF** be performed?

**SQF requires annual external certification audits, supplemented by routine internal audits and management reviews.** **Internal audits** (mandatory under 2.5.5) cover all elements at least annually; **management reviews** occur annually with monthly **SQF Practitioner** updates; validation/verification (2.5.1–2.5.2) and crisis/recall tests happen yearly, plus ongoing monitoring of PRPs like sanitation and pest control.

Q: What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SQF**?

**Non-compliance with SQF results in audit failure, certification denial/suspension, and loss of GFSI-recognized status, blocking market access to retailers requiring it.** Critical nonconformities (e.g., uncontrolled hazards) trigger immediate suspension; major/minor require corrective actions within 30 days; repeated failures lead to decertification, increased buyer audits, recall risks, and commercial exclusion from supply chains.

Q: Can **SQF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SQF maps to other GFSI-benchmarked frameworks through shared HACCP principles, management systems, and preventive controls.** Its **Module 2** elements (document control, CAPA, internal audits, traceability) align with common structures, allowing layering of **SQF Quality Code** atop existing GFSI programs; however, site-specific tailoring via FSCs ensures no direct clause-for-clause equivalence.

Q: What is the first step to begin implementing **SQF**?

**The first step to implement SQF is to register the site in the SQFI assessment database and designate a full-time, HACCP-trained SQF Practitioner (2.1.2).** Follow with a gap assessment against **Edition 9** (effective May 2021), select applicable modules (e.g., **Module 2 + 11**), and develop the food safety policy signed by senior management.

Q: What is the primary objective of **ISO 27017**?

**ISO 27017 provides cloud-specific implementation guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls plus 7 additional cloud-focused controls (CLD.6.3.1, CLD.8.1.5, CLD.9.5.1, CLD.9.5.2, CLD.12.1.5, CLD.12.4.5, CLD.13.1.4).** Published in 2015, it addresses shared responsibilities between **cloud service providers (CSPs)** and **cloud service customers (CSCs)**, covering multi-tenancy segregation, virtual machine hardening, asset removal/return, administrative operations, customer monitoring, and network alignment in public, private, and hybrid clouds.

Q: Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 27017**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 27017, as it is a voluntary code of practice.** Professionally, **CSPs** and **CSCs** with significant cloud footprints adopt it to demonstrate due diligence, especially in regulated sectors or procurement demanding cloud security assurance; ~94% of organizations use cloud services, with 61% reporting incidents, driving its use within ISO 27001 ISMS.

Q: Does **ISO 27017** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 27017 does not support standalone third-party certification or require external audits.** It is implemented within an **ISO 27001 ISMS**, with auditors assessing its 37+7 controls during ISO 27001 Stage 1/2 audits; certification bodies may reference ISO 27017 conformity as an extension on the ISO 27001 certificate.

Standards Comparison

SQF

Voluntary

2023

GFSI-benchmarked HACCP-based food safety certification program

ISO 27017

Voluntary

2015

International code of practice for cloud security controls

Quick Verdict

SQF ensures food safety certification for supply chains, while ISO 27017 provides cloud security guidance within ISO 27001. Food companies adopt SQF for GFSI recognition and market access; cloud users leverage ISO 27017 for shared responsibility clarity.

Agile Scaling

SQF

Safe Quality Food (SQF) Code Edition 9

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Modular architecture pairing universal Module 2 with sector GMPs
Mandatory full-time on-site HACCP-trained SQF Practitioner
HACCP-based Food Safety Plan with validation and verification
GFSI-benchmarked certification with graded nonconformity scoring
Senior management commitment via signed policy and reviews

Cloud Security

ISO 27017

ISO/IEC 27017:2015 Code of practice for cloud controls

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Adds 7 cloud-specific CLD security controls
Clarifies shared responsibilities between CSPs and CSCs
Provides guidance for multi-tenancy segregation
Addresses virtual machine configuration and hardening
Enables customer monitoring of cloud activities

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SQF Details

What It Is

Safe Quality Food (SQF) Code Edition 9 is a GFSI-benchmarked certification program and HACCP-based management system for food safety and quality. It applies across the supply chain from farm to fork, using a risk-based approach with modular structure: universal Module 2 (system elements) paired with sector-specific Good Practices (e.g., Module 11 for manufacturing GMPs).

Key Components

Management commitment, document control, HACCP Food Safety Plan, verification/validation, internal audits, traceability, recall/crisis management, food defense/fraud, allergens, training.
Over 100 auditable clauses in modules.
Built on Codex/NACMCF HACCP principles.
Third-party certification via licensed bodies with annual audits and scoring (E/G/C/F grades).

Why Organizations Use It

Provides market access to retailers, reduces audit duplication, aligns with FSMA/EU regs, minimizes recalls, builds food safety culture. Enhances supplier approval, operational efficiency, resilience.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, designate SQF Practitioner, document/implement PRPs/HACCP, internal audits, certification audit. For food manufacturers/distributors; 6-12 months typical; requires ongoing surveillance.

ISO 27017 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 27017:2015 is a code of practice for information security controls tailored to cloud services, extending ISO/IEC 27002. It addresses cloud-specific risks like shared responsibilities and multi-tenancy across IaaS, PaaS, SaaS. Its risk-based methodology integrates with ISO 27001 ISMS for practical implementation.

Key Components

Additional guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls + 7 CLD cloud-specific controls
Covers domains: access control, operations security, asset management, supplier relationships
Core principles: shared CSP/CSC responsibilities, virtualization segregation
Assessed via ISO 27001 certification, no standalone cert

Why Organizations Use It

Demonstrates cloud security maturity to customers/regulators
Aligns with GDPR/CCPA, reduces misconfiguration risks
Clarifies shared responsibilities, lowers incidents
Boosts procurement success, competitive differentiation
Builds stakeholder trust through auditable controls

Implementation Overview

Extend ISO 27001 via risk assessment, control mapping, SoA updates
Activities: configure logging/VM hardening, document SLAs
Suits CSPs/CSCs globally, all sizes
Joint audits typically 9-12 months (184 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	SQF	ISO 27017
Scope	Food safety management across supply chain	Cloud-specific information security controls
Industry	Food manufacturing, storage, distribution globally	Cloud service providers and customers worldwide
Nature	GFSI-benchmarked voluntary certification	Guidance code extending ISO 27001/27002
Testing	Annual third-party audits, unannounced checks	Integrated into ISO 27001 audits, no standalone
Penalties	Certification loss, market access denial	No direct penalties, audit nonconformities

Scope

SQF

Food safety management across supply chain

ISO 27017

Cloud-specific information security controls

Industry

SQF

Food manufacturing, storage, distribution globally

ISO 27017

Cloud service providers and customers worldwide

Nature

SQF

GFSI-benchmarked voluntary certification

ISO 27017

Guidance code extending ISO 27001/27002

Testing

SQF

Annual third-party audits, unannounced checks

ISO 27017

Integrated into ISO 27001 audits, no standalone

Penalties

SQF

Certification loss, market access denial

ISO 27017

No direct penalties, audit nonconformities

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SQF and ISO 27017

SQF FAQ

ISO 27017 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department

Discover 5 ways modern compliance software boosts HR, IT, finance & more: automate risks, enhance efficiency, ensure data integrity, stay audit-ready. Elevate y

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

Six Sigma vs ISO 13485

Uncover Six Sigma vs ISO 13485: DMAIC's data-driven edge meets medical device QMS rigor. Key differences, synergies & strategies for compliance, efficiency. Optimize now!

BRC vs Australian Privacy Act

Compare BRCGS Food Safety vs Australian Privacy Act: key differences in compliance, risk management, and implementation for food manufacturers. Align standards for audit success now!

POPIA vs GLBA

Discover POPIA vs GLBA: South Africa's GDPR-aligned privacy law meets US financial safeguards. Unpack scope, rights, enforcement diffs. Boost global compliance now!

SQF

ISO 27017

Quick Verdict

SQF

Key Features

ISO 27017

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SQF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 27017 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SQF FAQ

What is the primary objective of SQF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SQF?

Does SQF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SQF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SQF?

Can SQF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SQF?

ISO 27017 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 27017?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 27017?

Does ISO 27017 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 27017 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 27017?

Can ISO 27017 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 27017?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

Six Sigma vs ISO 13485

BRC vs Australian Privacy Act

POPIA vs GLBA