WCAG
Global standard for accessible web content
NIST 800-53
U.S. catalog of security and privacy controls
Quick Verdict
WCAG ensures web accessibility for disabled users via testable criteria, while NIST 800-53 provides security/privacy controls for systems. Companies adopt WCAG for legal/ethical compliance and UX; NIST for FISMA mandates, risk management.
WCAG
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2
Key Features
- POUR principles organize accessibility requirements
- Testable success criteria at A/AA/AAA levels
- Backward-compatible additive version updates
- Technology-agnostic for all web content
- Normative criteria separate from informative techniques
NIST 800-53
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Security Controls
Key Features
- 20 control families with 1,100+ security/privacy controls
- Risk-based baselines for low/moderate/high impact systems
- Integrated RMF lifecycle for selection, assessment, monitoring
- OSCAL machine-readable formats for automation
- Tailoring, overlays, and supply chain risk management
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
WCAG Details
What It Is
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 is the W3C's technology-agnostic framework for making web content accessible to people with disabilities. Its primary purpose is to provide testable success criteria under POUR principles (Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust), ensuring stable requirements for policy, procurement, and conformance claims.
Key Components
- Four POUR principles with 13 guidelines and ~90 success criteria at Levels A, AA, AAA.
- Normative success criteria separate from informative techniques, understanding docs.
- Conformance requires full pages, complete processes, accessibility-supported tech, non-interference.
- No formal certification; optional claims with detailed scope.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets legal benchmarks (ADA, Section 508, EN 301 549, EAA).
- Reduces litigation risk, improves UX/SEO, expands market reach.
- Enables procurement wins, builds stakeholder trust.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: policy, assessment, remediation, tooling/training, monitoring.
- Applies to all web publishers; scalable via design systems, CI/CD.
- Hybrid testing (automated/manual/user); ongoing for enterprises.
NIST 800-53 Details
What It Is
NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5 is the U.S. federal government's primary catalog of security and privacy controls for information systems and organizations. This framework provides standardized safeguards to protect confidentiality, integrity, availability, and privacy risks. It employs a risk-based, outcome-oriented approach integrated with the Risk Management Framework (RMF).
Key Components
- Organized into 20 control families (e.g., AC, AU, SR, PT) with over 1,100 base controls and enhancements.
- Baselines in SP 800-53B for Low, Moderate, High impact levels plus privacy baseline.
- Built on FIPS 199 categorization; supports tailoring, overlays, and OSCAL machine-readable formats.
- Compliance via RMF: select, implement, assess (SP 800-53A), authorize, monitor—no formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets FISMA/OMB A-130 mandates for federal entities/contractors; voluntary for others.
- Enhances risk management, operational resilience, supply chain security.
- Builds stakeholder trust, enables reciprocity, competitive edge in regulated sectors.
Implementation Overview
- Phased RMF process: categorize, select/tailor baselines, implement, assess, monitor.
- Applies to federal, contractors, critical infrastructure; scales by organization size.
- Requires governance, automation (OSCAL), audits; ~18-24 months typical rollout.
Key Differences
| Aspect | WCAG | NIST 800-53 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Web content accessibility for disabilities | Security/privacy controls for systems |
| Industry | All web-publishing organizations globally | Federal/contractors, critical infrastructure |
| Nature | Voluntary W3C standard, policy reference | Mandatory FISMA catalog, risk framework |
| Testing | Automated/manual/user testing, audits | RMF assessments, continuous monitoring |
| Penalties | Litigation/ADA lawsuits, no direct fines | FISMA sanctions, contract loss |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about WCAG and NIST 800-53
WCAG FAQ
NIST 800-53 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
SOC 2 for Fintech Startups: First 5 Steps to Compliance with Confidentiality Criterion Infographic
First 5 steps to SOC 2 compliance with Confidentiality for fintech SaaS. Infographic maps controls to risks like encryption & TPRM. Integrates GLBA/PCI DSS over
ISO 27701 Standalone Certification in 2025: Debunking Myths and Navigating the New Reality
Debunk myths on ISO 27701 standalone certification post-2025. Clarify viability, accreditation bodies, ISO 27001 audit differences & procurement benefits. Guide
NIST CSF 2.0 Supply Chain Risk Management: Complete Playbook with Profiles, Tiers, and Vendor Assessment Templates
Master NIST CSF 2.0 ID.SC supply chain risk management with vendor assessment templates, profile gap analysis, and tier strategies. Mitigate third-party threats
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
LGPD vs PMBOK
LGPD vs PMBOK: Compare Brazil's data law (10 principles, ANPD fines to 2% revenue) with PMI's project stds for compliance mastery. Key diffs, synergies & tips!
ISO 56002 vs ISO 30301
Compare ISO 56002 vs ISO 30301: Innovation guidance meets records requirements. HLS-aligned PDCA, leadership & audits for compliance. Integrate systems—boost efficiency now!
Basel III vs 23 NYCRR 500
Explore Basel III vs 23 NYCRR 500: Global capital, leverage, LCR/NSFR rules vs NY cybersecurity mandates on MFA, risk assessment & incident response. Master compliance strategies now!