WCAG
W3C standard for accessible web content
SAMA CSF
Saudi framework for financial sector cybersecurity compliance
Quick Verdict
WCAG ensures accessible web content globally via testable criteria for all organizations, while SAMA CSF mandates cybersecurity maturity for Saudi financial firms. Companies adopt WCAG for legal defense and inclusion; SAMA CSF for regulatory compliance and resilience.
WCAG
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2
Key Features
- Testable success criteria at A/AA/AAA conformance levels
- POUR principles organize 13 guidelines for accessibility
- Backward-compatible additive version updates preserve continuity
- Technology-agnostic applicable to all web technologies
- Strict requirements for full pages and complete processes
SAMA CSF
SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0
Key Features
- Six-level cyber security maturity model
- Four core control domains with subdomains
- Mandatory board governance and CISO role
- Risk-based principle approach with waivers
- Third-party risk management requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
WCAG Details
What It Is
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 is the W3C's technology-agnostic framework for making web content accessible to people with disabilities. Its primary purpose is to define testable requirements covering visual, auditory, motor, cognitive needs via a layered model of principles, guidelines, and success criteria.
Key Components
- **POUR principlesPerceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust.
- 13 guidelines with ~90 success criteria at A/AA/AAA levels.
- Informative techniques, failures, and understanding documents separate from normative criteria.
- Conformance model requires full pages, complete processes, accessibility-supported tech, non-interference.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets legal benchmarks (ADA, Section 508, EN 301 549, EAA).
- Reduces litigation risk amid rising lawsuits.
- Improves UX, conversion, SEO, market reach (1B+ disabled users).
- Enables procurement, builds trust, ESG benefits.
Implementation Overview
Phased program: policy, assessment, remediation via design systems/CI tools/training, hybrid testing (automated/manual/AT/user). Applies to all web-publishing orgs globally; no certification but VPAT/ACR for claims, ongoing audits essential.
SAMA CSF Details
What It Is
The Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority Cyber Security Framework (SAMA CSF), Version 1.0 (May 2017), is a mandatory regulatory framework for SAMA-regulated financial institutions in Saudi Arabia. It provides a principle-based, risk-oriented blueprint to govern cybersecurity, ensuring detection, resistance, response, and recovery from threats across information assets.
Key Components
- Four principal domains: Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, Risk Management and Compliance, Operations and Technology, Third-Party Cyber Security.
- Numerous subdomains with principles, objectives, and control considerations (114 subcontrols).
- Six-level maturity model (0: Non-existent to 5: Adaptive), targeting minimum Level 3.
- Aligned with NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS; self-assessment and SAMA audits for compliance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for banks, insurers, finance firms; non-compliance risks fines, audits, operational halts.
- Enhances resilience, reduces incidents, supports Vision 2030 digital growth.
- Builds trust, enables partnerships, optimizes efficiency via metrics and automation.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: gap analysis, risk assessment, control deployment, monitoring.
- Applies to all SAMA entities; scalable by size.
- Requires self-assessments, evidence portfolios; no external certification but SAMA review.
Key Differences
| Aspect | WCAG | SAMA CSF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Web content accessibility for disabilities | Cybersecurity across financial operations |
| Industry | All industries, global web content | Saudi financial institutions only |
| Nature | Voluntary W3C standard, policy reference | Mandatory regulatory framework |
| Testing | Automated/manual audits, user testing | Self-assessments, SAMA audits |
| Penalties | Litigation risk, no direct fines | Regulatory fines, enforcement actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about WCAG and SAMA CSF
WCAG FAQ
SAMA CSF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses
Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T
Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows
Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for
You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization
Master NIS2 implementation with our detailed guide. Learn requirements, risk assessment, supply chain security, and compliance steps for your organization. Star
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FERPA vs AS9110C
Discover FERPA vs AS9110C: Compare student privacy law with aerospace QMS standard. Unlock key differences, compliance tips & strategies for educators & aviation pros.
ISO 27018 vs ISO 56002
Compare ISO 27018 vs ISO 56002: Cloud PII privacy code (extends 27001) vs innovation IMS guidance (PDCA-led). Key diffs, benefits & integration for secure growth. Dive in!
IFS Food vs LEED
IFS Food vs LEED: Compare food safety audits with green building certification. Uncover compliance strategies, key differences & benefits for manufacturers. Optimize now!